Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Genicular Nerve Versus Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Analgesia

14 mai 2026 mis à jour par: Soha Saad Eldin Mohamed Hassouna, Zagazig University

Genicular Nerve Versus Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Severe postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA ) has been shown to negatively affect early mobilization, physical rehabilitation, time to discharge, and overall post-operative recovery.Therefore, reducing postoperative pain and early mobilization has become critical in reducing early mortality, preventing future chronic pain, and limiting the use of opioids The adductor canal block (ACB) has been found to be an excellent alternative to the FNB, providing adequate analgesia to the anterior knee compartment while enabling an improved postoperative range of motion by sparing motor branches to the quadriceps muscles . However, patients do not achieve adequate posterior knee analgesia as ACB pain relief is primarily limited to the anterior capsule of the knee.

Genicular nerve block (GNB) and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFGN) were originally introduced by Choi et al. as a therapeutic alternative for chronic knee OA and were quickly adopted for use in patients undergoing TKA due to the significant pain reduction and functional improvement observed in these patients . GNBs target five main innervating branches of the knee, including the superomedial, inferomedial, superolateral, inferolateral genicular nerves, and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA), an epidemic among aging populations, is a leading source of chronic pain in the United States and other developed countries . The rise in prevalence of knee OA is a direct result of factors including longer life expectancy and increased body mass index (BMI). It has been reported that at least 19% of American adults aged 45 years and older are affected . Severe postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA ) has been shown to negatively affect early mobilization, physical rehabilitation, time to discharge, and overall post-op recovery

.Therefore, reducing postoperative pain and early mobilization has become critical in reducing early mortality, preventing future chronic pain, and limiting the use of opioids . Balancing pain control with patient ambulation often proves to be a challenge due to both the motor blocking effects of many proximal nerve blocks and the often inadequate analgesia associated with more superficial periarticular injections . Therefore, numerous modalities of analgesic treatment combining different methods of nerve blockade for effective postoperative analgesia and faster functional recovery have been discussed . However, the superior technique is yet to be

determined. Successful postoperative analgesia for TKA requires careful consideration of knee innervation, with an emphasis placed on branches of the femoral nerve innervating the anterior and medical aspects of the knee and branches of the sciatic nerve innervating the posterior aspects of the knee capsule . In the context of nerve blockade, femoral nerve block (FNB) has traditionally been a critical component in the multimodal management of pain in TKA patients due to the high analgesic efficacy and the minimal risks associated. However, FNB is associated with decreased quadriceps motor strength leading to limited physical therapy (PT) participation, delayed ambulation, and discharge . The adductor canal block (ACB) has been found to be an excellent alternative to the FNB, providing adequate analgesia to the anterior knee compartment while enabling an improved postoperative range of motion by sparing motor branches to the quadriceps muscles . However, patients do not achieve adequate posterior knee analgesia as ACB pain relief is primarily limited to the anterior capsule of the knee.

Genicular nerve block (GNB) and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFGN) were originally introduced by Choi et al. as a therapeutic alternative for chronic knee OA and were quickly adopted for use in patients undergoing TKA due to the significant pain reduction and functional improvement observed in these patients . GNBs target five main innervating branches of the knee, including the superomedial, inferomedial, superolateral, inferolateral genicular nerves, and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve. Several bony landmarks surrounding these nerves aid in proper needle placement under fluoroscopic guidance . The GNB has a motor-sparing effect that is desirable for early ambulation postoperatively, better PT, and earlier discharge .

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

42

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Alsharqia
      • Zagazig, Alsharqia, Egypte, 4115
        • Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient acceptance.
  • Sex: both; male and female.
  • Age: over 65 years old.
  • American society of anesthesiologists (ASA): II .
  • Body mass index (BMI) less than 35 kg/m2.
  • Operation : elective unilateral TKA.
  • Duration of surgery : 2-3 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of allergy to local anesthetics (lidocaine or bupivicaine).
  • Coexisting hematologic disorders or malnourished patient.
  • Pre-existing major organ dysfunction including hepatic or renal failure, and left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  • Peripheral neuropathy.
  • Patients with a diagnosis of cognitive impairment or significant psychiatric illness.
  • Skin infection at site of block.
  • Contraindication to spinal anesthesia as coagulopathy and infection at site of injection.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: La prévention
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Double

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Autre: control group
Receive spinal anesthesia
spinal anesthesia will be given (under complete aseptic conditions) at the level of L3/4 while the patient in the sitting position using a spinal needle 25 G x 3.5 inches with injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 3ml plus fentanyl 25 microgram .
Comparateur actif: Genicular nerve block group
Receive Genicular Nerve Block

For the superomedial genicular nerve, a linear transducer will be placed along the longitudinal plane of the femur to visualize vastus medialis, the distal femur, and the genicular artery. Using an in-plane technique, a 10-cm echogenic 21-gauge needle will be advanced in the cephalad to the caudad direction until the needle contacted femoral shaft, just cephalad to the genicular artery, and 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected to spread along the femoral periosteum. This same technique, using 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, will be used in a mirror image on the lateral epicondyle to block the superolateral genicular nerve.

To target the inferomedial genicular nerve, a linear transducer will be placed in the sagittal plane on the anterior medial tibia.

Comparateur actif: Adductor canal block group
Receive Adductor canal block
The transducer will be placed anteromedially midway between inguinal crease and medial condyle to identify sartorius muscle. Probe will be positioned perpendicular to the femoral artery and using in-plane technique with needle directed from lateral to medial to deposit local anesthetic under sartorius and around the femoral artery. 15ml bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
changes of pain assessment
Délai: time frame ( at PACU, 2 hours (h ) , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16 , 24 hours postoperatively )
visual analogue scale
time frame ( at PACU, 2 hours (h ) , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16 , 24 hours postoperatively )

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Modified Bromage scale
Délai: at PACU, 3 hours and 6 hours postoperatively
no motor nerveblock in the lower extremity = 0 point; the affected limb cannot lift the leg = 1 point; failure to bend the knee of the affected limb = 2 points; and failure to bend the ankle = 3points
at PACU, 3 hours and 6 hours postoperatively

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Soha Saad mohamed Hassouna, PHD, Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

1 octobre 2023

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

6 mai 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

19 juin 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

9 mai 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 mai 2026

Première publication (Réel)

15 mai 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

15 mai 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

14 mai 2026

Dernière vérification

1 mai 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

OUI

Description du régime IPD

Planned after completion of the study and publications

Délai de partage IPD

Planned after completion of the study and publications

Critères d'accès au partage IPD

Contact with principal investigator

Type d'informations de prise en charge du partage d'IPD

  • PROTOCOLE D'ÉTUDE
  • SÈVE
  • CIF
  • RSE

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner