- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07588958
Genicular Nerve Versus Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Analgesia
Genicular Nerve Versus Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
Severe postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA ) has been shown to negatively affect early mobilization, physical rehabilitation, time to discharge, and overall post-operative recovery.Therefore, reducing postoperative pain and early mobilization has become critical in reducing early mortality, preventing future chronic pain, and limiting the use of opioids The adductor canal block (ACB) has been found to be an excellent alternative to the FNB, providing adequate analgesia to the anterior knee compartment while enabling an improved postoperative range of motion by sparing motor branches to the quadriceps muscles . However, patients do not achieve adequate posterior knee analgesia as ACB pain relief is primarily limited to the anterior capsule of the knee.
Genicular nerve block (GNB) and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFGN) were originally introduced by Choi et al. as a therapeutic alternative for chronic knee OA and were quickly adopted for use in patients undergoing TKA due to the significant pain reduction and functional improvement observed in these patients . GNBs target five main innervating branches of the knee, including the superomedial, inferomedial, superolateral, inferolateral genicular nerves, and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Descripción detallada
Chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA), an epidemic among aging populations, is a leading source of chronic pain in the United States and other developed countries . The rise in prevalence of knee OA is a direct result of factors including longer life expectancy and increased body mass index (BMI). It has been reported that at least 19% of American adults aged 45 years and older are affected . Severe postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA ) has been shown to negatively affect early mobilization, physical rehabilitation, time to discharge, and overall post-op recovery
.Therefore, reducing postoperative pain and early mobilization has become critical in reducing early mortality, preventing future chronic pain, and limiting the use of opioids . Balancing pain control with patient ambulation often proves to be a challenge due to both the motor blocking effects of many proximal nerve blocks and the often inadequate analgesia associated with more superficial periarticular injections . Therefore, numerous modalities of analgesic treatment combining different methods of nerve blockade for effective postoperative analgesia and faster functional recovery have been discussed . However, the superior technique is yet to be
determined. Successful postoperative analgesia for TKA requires careful consideration of knee innervation, with an emphasis placed on branches of the femoral nerve innervating the anterior and medical aspects of the knee and branches of the sciatic nerve innervating the posterior aspects of the knee capsule . In the context of nerve blockade, femoral nerve block (FNB) has traditionally been a critical component in the multimodal management of pain in TKA patients due to the high analgesic efficacy and the minimal risks associated. However, FNB is associated with decreased quadriceps motor strength leading to limited physical therapy (PT) participation, delayed ambulation, and discharge . The adductor canal block (ACB) has been found to be an excellent alternative to the FNB, providing adequate analgesia to the anterior knee compartment while enabling an improved postoperative range of motion by sparing motor branches to the quadriceps muscles . However, patients do not achieve adequate posterior knee analgesia as ACB pain relief is primarily limited to the anterior capsule of the knee.
Genicular nerve block (GNB) and radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFGN) were originally introduced by Choi et al. as a therapeutic alternative for chronic knee OA and were quickly adopted for use in patients undergoing TKA due to the significant pain reduction and functional improvement observed in these patients . GNBs target five main innervating branches of the knee, including the superomedial, inferomedial, superolateral, inferolateral genicular nerves, and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve. Several bony landmarks surrounding these nerves aid in proper needle placement under fluoroscopic guidance . The GNB has a motor-sparing effect that is desirable for early ambulation postoperatively, better PT, and earlier discharge .
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Alsharqia
-
Zagazig, Alsharqia, Egipto, 4115
- Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient acceptance.
- Sex: both; male and female.
- Age: over 65 years old.
- American society of anesthesiologists (ASA): II .
- Body mass index (BMI) less than 35 kg/m2.
- Operation : elective unilateral TKA.
- Duration of surgery : 2-3 hours.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of allergy to local anesthetics (lidocaine or bupivicaine).
- Coexisting hematologic disorders or malnourished patient.
- Pre-existing major organ dysfunction including hepatic or renal failure, and left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
- Peripheral neuropathy.
- Patients with a diagnosis of cognitive impairment or significant psychiatric illness.
- Skin infection at site of block.
- Contraindication to spinal anesthesia as coagulopathy and infection at site of injection.
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Prevención
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Doble
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Otro: control group
Receive spinal anesthesia
|
spinal anesthesia will be given (under complete aseptic conditions) at the level of L3/4 while the patient in the sitting position using a spinal needle 25 G x 3.5 inches with injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 3ml plus fentanyl 25 microgram .
|
|
Comparador activo: Genicular nerve block group
Receive Genicular Nerve Block
|
For the superomedial genicular nerve, a linear transducer will be placed along the longitudinal plane of the femur to visualize vastus medialis, the distal femur, and the genicular artery. Using an in-plane technique, a 10-cm echogenic 21-gauge needle will be advanced in the cephalad to the caudad direction until the needle contacted femoral shaft, just cephalad to the genicular artery, and 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected to spread along the femoral periosteum. This same technique, using 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, will be used in a mirror image on the lateral epicondyle to block the superolateral genicular nerve. To target the inferomedial genicular nerve, a linear transducer will be placed in the sagittal plane on the anterior medial tibia. |
|
Comparador activo: Adductor canal block group
Receive Adductor canal block
|
The transducer will be placed anteromedially midway between inguinal crease and medial condyle to identify sartorius muscle.
Probe will be positioned perpendicular to the femoral artery and using in-plane technique with needle directed from lateral to medial to deposit local anesthetic under sartorius and around the femoral artery.
15ml bupivacaine 0.25% will be injected
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
changes of pain assessment
Periodo de tiempo: time frame ( at PACU, 2 hours (h ) , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16 , 24 hours postoperatively )
|
visual analogue scale
|
time frame ( at PACU, 2 hours (h ) , 4 , 8 , 12 , 16 , 24 hours postoperatively )
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Modified Bromage scale
Periodo de tiempo: at PACU, 3 hours and 6 hours postoperatively
|
no motor nerveblock in the lower extremity = 0 point; the affected limb cannot lift the leg = 1 point; failure to bend the knee of the affected limb = 2 points; and failure to bend the ankle = 3points
|
at PACU, 3 hours and 6 hours postoperatively
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Soha Saad mohamed Hassouna, PHD, Faculty of Medicine - Zagazig University
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
- Químicos orgánicos
- Compuestos heterocíclicos, 1 anillo
- Compuestos heterocíclicos
- Aniluros
- Amidas
- Compuestos anilina
- Amina
- Piperidinas
- Factores socioeconómicos
- Características de la población
- Anestesia y analgesia
- Demografía
- Anestesia, conducción
- Anestesia
- Características familiares
- Estado civil
- Bupivacaína
- Fentanilo
- Anestesia, espinal
- Soltero
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 10793-14/5-2023
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD
Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD
Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
- SAVIA
- CIF
- RSC
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .