Sensory Neurography and S2PD, a Test-Retest Study
Sensory Neurography and S2PD: A Test-Retest Study in Ten Healthy Individuals to Assess Method Reliability
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
A neurophysiological examination can objectively measure remaining function in an injured digital nerve. Using this method, axons that are still able to conduct an action potential are assessed.
The response can be measured as the amplitude (the summed action potentials from the nerve's axons) and as the area (the amount of functioning axons). The area is a somewhat more precise measurement method, as it includes all axons, both those with low and high conduction velocities. Amplitude measurements may give falsely low values if nerves with poorer degrees of myelination are included in the measurement. Amplitude is measured in µV (microvolt) and area in µV/ms (microvolt per millisecond).
The method currently used to assess discriminative sensation is the S2PD-test. In this test two pins are pressed perpendicular and longitudinally on each side of the fingertip. The pins can consist of an unfolded paper clip or a factory-made discriminator. The distance between the two pins, where it is possible to discriminate between one or two pins, is the S2PD. The test is influenced by many external factors, such as the clinician's level of experience, the patient's desire to give the correct answer, language barriers, and similar issues. Furthermore, this examination method does not clarify what is actually being measured beyond the patient's subjective discriminative sensation.
If neurophysiological assessment is used as a complement to S2PD and can provide an objective measurement tool with high reliability and reproducibility, it could become an important addition to the clinical arsenal for follow-up after nerve injury. Such knowledge would make it easier to clinically evaluate, understand, and monitor the healing process of the injured nerve. It would also facilitate the assessment and systematic follow-up of treatment outcomes.
The participants will be examined at the Hand Surgery Clinic at South General Hospital at two separate occasions separated. Each visit is estimated to last approximately 60 minutes. It will include assessment using S2PD and neurophysiological examination of the radial side of the second and fourth fingers on both hands.
Finger temperature will be measured using an infrared thermometer (Testo 826-T2), and, if necessary, the fingers will be warmed (using a water bath, heating pad or something similar) to a target temperature of a minimum of 32 °C. The hands will then be gently abraded using a preparation gel (NuPrep). Conductive gel (Ten20) will be applied to the electrodes.
A recording electrode will be placed volarly over the wrist, a ground electrode in the palm, and the stimulating electrode on the radial side of the finger (digits II and IV). Electrical stimulation will be delivered in an orthodromic direction, from the finger toward the wrist. The stimulus intensity will be gradually increased until no further increase in amplitude is observed/amplitude is stable. At the first visit, the examination begins with S2PD followed by sensory neurography. At the second visit, the order of the assessments is reversed to minimize potential crossover effects.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
-
Stockholm、スウェーデン
- Department of Hand Surgery, Södersjukhuset Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >20
- Age <60
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neurologic disease
- Dementia
- Cognitive disability
- Severe psychiatric disorder (not be able to participate)
- Ongoing drug abuse
- Not understanding swedish language
- History of carpal tunnel syndrome
- Negative experience of electric stimulation
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:デバイスの実現可能性
- 割り当て:非ランダム化
- 介入モデル:クロスオーバー割り当て
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:S2PD and sensory neurography
Radial digital nerve of second and fourth finger on both hands, are first examined with S2PD, secondly with Sensory neurography.
|
see section "study description"
see section "study description"
|
|
アクティブコンパレータ:Sensory neurography and S2PD
Radial digital nerve of second and fourth finger on both hands, are first examined with Sensory neurography, secondly with S2PD
|
see section "study description"
see section "study description"
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Reliability of method: Sensory neurography measurements (AREA) performed on two separate occasions.
時間枠:Measures will be assessed at baseline and 2 weeks.
|
ICC (Intraclass correlation coefficient) will be used to assess correlation between measurements at baseline and 2 weeks
|
Measures will be assessed at baseline and 2 weeks.
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of agreement AREA
時間枠:Measurements will be performed at baseline and at 2 weeks.
|
The Bland-Altman method will be used to assess whether the measurement method demonstrates sufficient agreement to be considered reliable.
The predefined limit for acceptable differences between measurements is 50%.
|
Measurements will be performed at baseline and at 2 weeks.
|
|
Reliability of method: Sensory neurography measurements (SNAP) performed on two separate occasions
時間枠:Measures will be assessed at baseline and 2 weeks.
|
ICC (Intraclass correlation coefficient) will be used to assess whether the measurement method demonstrates sufficient correlation to be considered reliable.
|
Measures will be assessed at baseline and 2 weeks.
|
|
Assessment of agreement SNAP
時間枠:Measurements at baseline and 2 weeks
|
The Bland-Altman method will be used to assess whether the measurement method demonstrates sufficient agreement to be considered reliable.
The predefined limit for acceptable differences between measurements is 50%.
|
Measurements at baseline and 2 weeks
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Cecilia Mellstrand Navarrro, Associate professor、Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1085-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91748-9.
- Pan D, Patel AU, Patterson JM, Johnson AR, Gordon T, Mackinnon SE. Surgeons, physiatrists and neurologists speaking "EDX and nerve surgery": A paradigm shift for nerve injured patients. JPRAS Open. 2025 Nov 12;47:3-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.11.004. eCollection 2025.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- 2024-08365-02
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD プランの説明
IPD 共有時間枠
IPD 共有アクセス基準
IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。