- ICH GCP
- Yhdysvaltain kliinisten tutkimusten rekisteri
- Kliininen tutkimus NCT07605585
Sensory Neurography and S2PD, a Test-Retest Study
Sensory Neurography and S2PD: A Test-Retest Study in Ten Healthy Individuals to Assess Method Reliability
Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus
Tila
Interventio / Hoito
Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus
A neurophysiological examination can objectively measure remaining function in an injured digital nerve. Using this method, axons that are still able to conduct an action potential are assessed.
The response can be measured as the amplitude (the summed action potentials from the nerve's axons) and as the area (the amount of functioning axons). The area is a somewhat more precise measurement method, as it includes all axons, both those with low and high conduction velocities. Amplitude measurements may give falsely low values if nerves with poorer degrees of myelination are included in the measurement. Amplitude is measured in µV (microvolt) and area in µV/ms (microvolt per millisecond).
The method currently used to assess discriminative sensation is the S2PD-test. In this test two pins are pressed perpendicular and longitudinally on each side of the fingertip. The pins can consist of an unfolded paper clip or a factory-made discriminator. The distance between the two pins, where it is possible to discriminate between one or two pins, is the S2PD. The test is influenced by many external factors, such as the clinician's level of experience, the patient's desire to give the correct answer, language barriers, and similar issues. Furthermore, this examination method does not clarify what is actually being measured beyond the patient's subjective discriminative sensation.
If neurophysiological assessment is used as a complement to S2PD and can provide an objective measurement tool with high reliability and reproducibility, it could become an important addition to the clinical arsenal for follow-up after nerve injury. Such knowledge would make it easier to clinically evaluate, understand, and monitor the healing process of the injured nerve. It would also facilitate the assessment and systematic follow-up of treatment outcomes.
The participants will be examined at the Hand Surgery Clinic at South General Hospital at two separate occasions separated. Each visit is estimated to last approximately 60 minutes. It will include assessment using S2PD and neurophysiological examination of the radial side of the second and fourth fingers on both hands.
Finger temperature will be measured using an infrared thermometer (Testo 826-T2), and, if necessary, the fingers will be warmed (using a water bath, heating pad or something similar) to a target temperature of a minimum of 32 °C. The hands will then be gently abraded using a preparation gel (NuPrep). Conductive gel (Ten20) will be applied to the electrodes.
A recording electrode will be placed volarly over the wrist, a ground electrode in the palm, and the stimulating electrode on the radial side of the finger (digits II and IV). Electrical stimulation will be delivered in an orthodromic direction, from the finger toward the wrist. The stimulus intensity will be gradually increased until no further increase in amplitude is observed/amplitude is stable. At the first visit, the examination begins with S2PD followed by sensory neurography. At the second visit, the order of the assessments is reversed to minimize potential crossover effects.
Opintotyyppi
Ilmoittautuminen (Todellinen)
Vaihe
- Ei sovellettavissa
Yhteystiedot ja paikat
Opiskelupaikat
-
-
-
Stockholm, Ruotsi
- Department of Hand Surgery, Södersjukhuset Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
-
-
Osallistumiskriteerit
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Opintokelpoiset iät
- Aikuinen
Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia
Kuvaus
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >20
- Age <60
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neurologic disease
- Dementia
- Cognitive disability
- Severe psychiatric disorder (not be able to participate)
- Ongoing drug abuse
- Not understanding swedish language
- History of carpal tunnel syndrome
- Negative experience of electric stimulation
Opintosuunnitelma
Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?
Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat
- Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Laitteen toteutettavuus
- Jako: Ei satunnaistettu
- Inventiomalli: Crossover-tehtävä
- Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)
Aseet ja interventiot
Osallistujaryhmä / Arm |
Interventio / Hoito |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: S2PD and sensory neurography
Radial digital nerve of second and fourth finger on both hands, are first examined with S2PD, secondly with Sensory neurography.
|
see section "study description"
see section "study description"
|
|
Active Comparator: Sensory neurography and S2PD
Radial digital nerve of second and fourth finger on both hands, are first examined with Sensory neurography, secondly with S2PD
|
see section "study description"
see section "study description"
|
Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Reliability of method: Sensory neurography measurements (AREA) performed on two separate occasions.
Aikaikkuna: Measures will be assessed at baseline and 2 weeks.
|
ICC (Intraclass correlation coefficient) will be used to assess correlation between measurements at baseline and 2 weeks
|
Measures will be assessed at baseline and 2 weeks.
|
Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of agreement AREA
Aikaikkuna: Measurements will be performed at baseline and at 2 weeks.
|
The Bland-Altman method will be used to assess whether the measurement method demonstrates sufficient agreement to be considered reliable.
The predefined limit for acceptable differences between measurements is 50%.
|
Measurements will be performed at baseline and at 2 weeks.
|
|
Reliability of method: Sensory neurography measurements (SNAP) performed on two separate occasions
Aikaikkuna: Measures will be assessed at baseline and 2 weeks.
|
ICC (Intraclass correlation coefficient) will be used to assess whether the measurement method demonstrates sufficient correlation to be considered reliable.
|
Measures will be assessed at baseline and 2 weeks.
|
|
Assessment of agreement SNAP
Aikaikkuna: Measurements at baseline and 2 weeks
|
The Bland-Altman method will be used to assess whether the measurement method demonstrates sufficient agreement to be considered reliable.
The predefined limit for acceptable differences between measurements is 50%.
|
Measurements at baseline and 2 weeks
|
Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat
Sponsori
Tutkijat
- Päätutkija: Cecilia Mellstrand Navarrro, Associate professor, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
Julkaisuja ja hyödyllisiä linkkejä
Yleiset julkaisut
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60. doi: 10.1177/096228029900800204.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1085-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91748-9.
- Pan D, Patel AU, Patterson JM, Johnson AR, Gordon T, Mackinnon SE. Surgeons, physiatrists and neurologists speaking "EDX and nerve surgery": A paradigm shift for nerve injured patients. JPRAS Open. 2025 Nov 12;47:3-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2025.11.004. eCollection 2025.
Opintojen ennätyspäivät
Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät
Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)
Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)
Opintojen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)
Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)
Tutkimustietojen päivitykset
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Lisää tietoa
Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
- 2024-08365-02
Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)
Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?
IPD-suunnitelman kuvaus
IPD-jaon aikakehys
IPD-jaon käyttöoikeuskriteerit
IPD-jakamista tukeva tietotyyppi
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- MAHLA
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta
Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .