Interventional AI-Human Collaboration for Steatotic Liver Disease Screening
AI-Driven Opportunistic Screening and Risk-Adapted Management of Steatotic Liver Disease
調査の概要
状態
詳細な説明
The AIG-SLD Screening Project is a single-arm, open-label, prospective interventional study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a MAOSS-guided identification and AI-human collaboration recall strategy for detecting individuals at intermediate or high risk of steatotic liver disease (SLD) and for assessing intervention outcomes. The trail will prospectively and consecutively enroll around 8000 eligible adults aged ≥18 years who undergo routine chest or abdominal non-contrast CT (NCCT) with adequate hepatic coverage .
The AI system i.e. MAOSS will be embedded within the standard clinical workflow to evaluate the real-world performance and the impact of AIG-SLD screening. All eligible NCCT scans will be evaluated through two parallel streams:
- Standard of Care (SoC) workflow: Radiologists perform independent assessments, first-line radiologists review followed by a senior radiologist finalizing the report.
- AIG workflow: The MAOSS system simultaneously analyzes the identical imaging data in real-time.
The system screens patients with clinically suspected SLD by flagging those with a MAOSS score ≥1.6 and a FIBRO Score ≥1.7 for recall. These algorithmic flags will be compared against radiologists' determinations of clinically significant SLD. Management pathways are defined as follows: (1) Concordant cases: If the Standard of Care (SoC) and the AIG pathway agree (both recommending recall or both recommending no recall), the agreed-upon decision will be executed. (2) Discordant cases: If the SoC and AIG pathways disagree, patients will be recalled for primary hepatology care to ensure safety.
Primary hepatology care begins with the collection of questionnaires regarding medical history, lifestyle, alcohol consumption, and metabolic risks (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, obesity, metabolic syndrome, significant alcohol consumption, or viral hepatitis) followed by further serum laboratory tests and Transient Elastography (e.g., FibroScan). Recalled patients will be managed according to the MAOSS pathway starting with FIB-4 stratification (<1.3, 1.3-2.67, >2.67), followed by FAST stratification (<0.35, ≥0.35) as needed. Intermediate-to-high-risk patients will proceed to escalated care involving MRE, MRI-PDFF, or liver biopsy. Management is then determined by MRE-derived Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM): patients with LSM < 3.5 kPa will receive lifestyle interventions and annual reassessment; those with LSM 3.5-5.0 kPa (F2-F3) will receive pharmacological or therapeutic interventions; and those with LSM ≥ 5.0 kPa (F4) will undergo cirrhosis-based management. Patients in the latter two groups will be reassessed every six months to monitor changes in steatosis and fibrosis.
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
Liaoning
-
Shenyang、Liaoning、中国、110004
- Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged ≥18 years undergoing routine non-contrast or contrast-enhanced chest or abdominal CT examination.
- CT images with adequate hepatic coverage and sufficient image quality for MAOSS analysis.
- Willing to undergo the recall evaluation and either: having a FIB-4 result within the past 1 month, or willing to complete blood testing (ALT, AST, platelet count) required for FIB-4 calculation and undergo FibroScan or MRE assessment.
- Willing to participate in the study and able to provide written informed consent at the time of recall.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known malignant liver tumors (e.g., HCC, cholangiocarcinoma) or a history of liver transplantation or major hepatic resection.
- Known cirrhosis based on noninvasive fibrosis assessment tests, liver biopsy or complications of decompensated disease, or with a documented history of cirrhosis identified by clinical notes will be excluded.
- Biliary obstruction, acute cholangitis, or other conditions that may interfere with interpretation of liver biochemistry or fibrosis risk assessment.
- CT images with severe artifacts or incomplete liver coverage preventing reliable MAOSS analysis.
- Severe acute systemic illness (e.g., sepsis, shock, acute heart failure), or pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Unwilling or unable to complete recall procedures, including required blood tests, FibroScan, or MRE when indicated, or unable to comply with study follow-up.
- Severe comorbidity with an expected survival of less than 1 year (e.g., terminal malignancy).
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:ふるい分け
- 割り当て:なし
- 介入モデル:単一グループの割り当て
- マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
実験的:AI-human collaboration for SLD screening
In the prospective analysis phase, all eligible NCCT scans will be evaluated through two parallel streams: 1.
Standard of Care (SoC) workflow: Radiologists perform independent assessments as per standard clinical procedures (e.g., first-line radiologists' reviews followed by senior radiologist finalizing the report).
2. AIG workflow: The MAOSS system simultaneously analyzes the identical imaging data in real-time.
|
The system screens patients with clinically suspected SLD by flagging those with a MAOSS score ≥1.6 and a FIBRO Score ≥1.7 for recall.
These algorithmic flags will be compared against radiologists' determinations of clinically significant SLD.
Management pathways are defined as follows: (1) Concordant cases: If the Standard of Care (SoC) and the AIG pathway agree (both recommending recall or both recommending no recall), the agreed-upon decision will be executed.
(2) Discordant cases: If the SoC and AIG pathways disagree, patients will be recalled for primary hepatology care to ensure safety and avoid potential missed diagnosis.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Effective referral yield for escalated hepatology care
時間枠:6 months
|
Effective referral yield: the proportion of patients referred for escalated hepatology care confirmed with clinically significant (or above) fibrosis by MRE/liver biposy.
A non-inferiority test (and estimates of the associated absolute and relative differences) will be performed for effective referral yield between SoC and AIG workflow.
|
6 months
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Real-World Screening Specificity
時間枠:Duration of the study (12 months)
|
A critical safety endpoint is to determine if AIG-SLD care pathway maintains a high specificity to prevent false referral, thereby avoiding unnecessary interventions.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Real-World Screening Sensitivity
時間枠:Duration of the study (12 months)
|
A critical efficacy endpoint is to determine if AIG-SLD care pathway is sufficiently sensitive to identify patients who actually need interventions.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Real-World Screening Negative predictive value
時間枠:Duration of the study (12 months)
|
This evaluates the AIG-SLD care pathway's ability to correctly exclude low-risk patients who actually do not need interventions.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Intervention Success (Fibrosis Reversion)
時間枠:Duration of the study (12 months)
|
The proportion of patients referred for escalated care achieves fibrosis stage reversion.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Intervention Success (Steatosis Reversion)
時間枠:Duration of the study (12 months)
|
The proportion of patients referred for escalated care achieves steatosis stage Reversion.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Quantitative Liver Stiffness Trends
時間枠:Duration of the study (12 months)
|
The overall longitudinal changes in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) values for all patients referred to escalated care.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Quantitative Liver Steatosis Trends
時間枠:Duration of the study (12 months)
|
The overall longitudinal changes in Liver Fat Content (CAP/PDFF) values for all patients referred to escalated care.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Intervention Patient Adherence
時間枠:Duration of the study (12 months)
|
The overall intervention adherence rate for all patients referred to escalated care.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
出版物と役立つリンク
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (実際)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
その他の研究ID番号
- SH-CMU-SLD-Intervention
個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画
個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?
IPD 共有サポート情報タイプ
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書
米国FDA規制医薬品の研究
米国FDA規制機器製品の研究
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。