- ICH GCP
- 미국 임상 시험 레지스트리
- 임상시험 NCT07613827
Interventional AI-Human Collaboration for Steatotic Liver Disease Screening
AI-Driven Opportunistic Screening and Risk-Adapted Management of Steatotic Liver Disease
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
The AIG-SLD Screening Project is a single-arm, open-label, prospective interventional study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a MAOSS-guided identification and AI-human collaboration recall strategy for detecting individuals at intermediate or high risk of steatotic liver disease (SLD) and for assessing intervention outcomes. The trail will prospectively and consecutively enroll around 8000 eligible adults aged ≥18 years who undergo routine chest or abdominal non-contrast CT (NCCT) with adequate hepatic coverage .
The AI system i.e. MAOSS will be embedded within the standard clinical workflow to evaluate the real-world performance and the impact of AIG-SLD screening. All eligible NCCT scans will be evaluated through two parallel streams:
- Standard of Care (SoC) workflow: Radiologists perform independent assessments, first-line radiologists review followed by a senior radiologist finalizing the report.
- AIG workflow: The MAOSS system simultaneously analyzes the identical imaging data in real-time.
The system screens patients with clinically suspected SLD by flagging those with a MAOSS score ≥1.6 and a FIBRO Score ≥1.7 for recall. These algorithmic flags will be compared against radiologists' determinations of clinically significant SLD. Management pathways are defined as follows: (1) Concordant cases: If the Standard of Care (SoC) and the AIG pathway agree (both recommending recall or both recommending no recall), the agreed-upon decision will be executed. (2) Discordant cases: If the SoC and AIG pathways disagree, patients will be recalled for primary hepatology care to ensure safety.
Primary hepatology care begins with the collection of questionnaires regarding medical history, lifestyle, alcohol consumption, and metabolic risks (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, obesity, metabolic syndrome, significant alcohol consumption, or viral hepatitis) followed by further serum laboratory tests and Transient Elastography (e.g., FibroScan). Recalled patients will be managed according to the MAOSS pathway starting with FIB-4 stratification (<1.3, 1.3-2.67, >2.67), followed by FAST stratification (<0.35, ≥0.35) as needed. Intermediate-to-high-risk patients will proceed to escalated care involving MRE, MRI-PDFF, or liver biopsy. Management is then determined by MRE-derived Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM): patients with LSM < 3.5 kPa will receive lifestyle interventions and annual reassessment; those with LSM 3.5-5.0 kPa (F2-F3) will receive pharmacological or therapeutic interventions; and those with LSM ≥ 5.0 kPa (F4) will undergo cirrhosis-based management. Patients in the latter two groups will be reassessed every six months to monitor changes in steatosis and fibrosis.
연구 유형
등록 (추정된)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Liaoning
-
Shenyang, Liaoning, 중국, 110004
- Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
- 성인
- 고령자
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged ≥18 years undergoing routine non-contrast or contrast-enhanced chest or abdominal CT examination.
- CT images with adequate hepatic coverage and sufficient image quality for MAOSS analysis.
- Willing to undergo the recall evaluation and either: having a FIB-4 result within the past 1 month, or willing to complete blood testing (ALT, AST, platelet count) required for FIB-4 calculation and undergo FibroScan or MRE assessment.
- Willing to participate in the study and able to provide written informed consent at the time of recall.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known malignant liver tumors (e.g., HCC, cholangiocarcinoma) or a history of liver transplantation or major hepatic resection.
- Known cirrhosis based on noninvasive fibrosis assessment tests, liver biopsy or complications of decompensated disease, or with a documented history of cirrhosis identified by clinical notes will be excluded.
- Biliary obstruction, acute cholangitis, or other conditions that may interfere with interpretation of liver biochemistry or fibrosis risk assessment.
- CT images with severe artifacts or incomplete liver coverage preventing reliable MAOSS analysis.
- Severe acute systemic illness (e.g., sepsis, shock, acute heart failure), or pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Unwilling or unable to complete recall procedures, including required blood tests, FibroScan, or MRE when indicated, or unable to comply with study follow-up.
- Severe comorbidity with an expected survival of less than 1 year (e.g., terminal malignancy).
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 상영
- 할당: 해당 없음
- 중재 모델: 단일 그룹 할당
- 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: AI-human collaboration for SLD screening
In the prospective analysis phase, all eligible NCCT scans will be evaluated through two parallel streams: 1.
Standard of Care (SoC) workflow: Radiologists perform independent assessments as per standard clinical procedures (e.g., first-line radiologists' reviews followed by senior radiologist finalizing the report).
2. AIG workflow: The MAOSS system simultaneously analyzes the identical imaging data in real-time.
|
The system screens patients with clinically suspected SLD by flagging those with a MAOSS score ≥1.6 and a FIBRO Score ≥1.7 for recall.
These algorithmic flags will be compared against radiologists' determinations of clinically significant SLD.
Management pathways are defined as follows: (1) Concordant cases: If the Standard of Care (SoC) and the AIG pathway agree (both recommending recall or both recommending no recall), the agreed-upon decision will be executed.
(2) Discordant cases: If the SoC and AIG pathways disagree, patients will be recalled for primary hepatology care to ensure safety and avoid potential missed diagnosis.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Effective referral yield for escalated hepatology care
기간: 6 months
|
Effective referral yield: the proportion of patients referred for escalated hepatology care confirmed with clinically significant (or above) fibrosis by MRE/liver biposy.
A non-inferiority test (and estimates of the associated absolute and relative differences) will be performed for effective referral yield between SoC and AIG workflow.
|
6 months
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Real-World Screening Specificity
기간: Duration of the study (12 months)
|
A critical safety endpoint is to determine if AIG-SLD care pathway maintains a high specificity to prevent false referral, thereby avoiding unnecessary interventions.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Real-World Screening Sensitivity
기간: Duration of the study (12 months)
|
A critical efficacy endpoint is to determine if AIG-SLD care pathway is sufficiently sensitive to identify patients who actually need interventions.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Real-World Screening Negative predictive value
기간: Duration of the study (12 months)
|
This evaluates the AIG-SLD care pathway's ability to correctly exclude low-risk patients who actually do not need interventions.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Intervention Success (Fibrosis Reversion)
기간: Duration of the study (12 months)
|
The proportion of patients referred for escalated care achieves fibrosis stage reversion.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Intervention Success (Steatosis Reversion)
기간: Duration of the study (12 months)
|
The proportion of patients referred for escalated care achieves steatosis stage Reversion.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Quantitative Liver Stiffness Trends
기간: Duration of the study (12 months)
|
The overall longitudinal changes in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) values for all patients referred to escalated care.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Quantitative Liver Steatosis Trends
기간: Duration of the study (12 months)
|
The overall longitudinal changes in Liver Fat Content (CAP/PDFF) values for all patients referred to escalated care.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
|
Intervention Patient Adherence
기간: Duration of the study (12 months)
|
The overall intervention adherence rate for all patients referred to escalated care.
|
Duration of the study (12 months)
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (추정된)
연구 완료 (추정된)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- SH-CMU-SLD-Intervention
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형
- 연구_프로토콜
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .