Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Interventional AI-Human Collaboration for Steatotic Liver Disease Screening

23 de mayo de 2026 actualizado por: Yu Shi, Shengjing Hospital

AI-Driven Opportunistic Screening and Risk-Adapted Management of Steatotic Liver Disease

Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is one of the most prevalent chronic liver diseases worldwide, affecting nearly 30% of the global population and projected to exceed 55% by 2040. Timely identification and management of intermediate- and high-risk SLD patients are essential, yet early detection remains challenging because current diagnostic modalities, such as biopsy, ultrasonography, and serum indices, are invasive, insensitive, operator-dependent, or difficult to scale. In contrast, non-contrast CT is widely available in routine care and offers substantial potential for opportunistic SLD screening, although this value has not been fully utilized. Our previously developed MAOSS model accurately identifies intermediate- and high-risk individuals, with MAOSS score≥1.6 combined with Fibro Score ≥1.7, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity in our large-scale retrospective study. However, despite these promising retrospective findings, the model has not undergone prospective interventional validation, and it remains unclear whether an AI-guided workflow can truly enhance clinical risk stratification, diagnostic yield, and downstream management in real-world SLD populations. Therefore, a prospective intervention study is needed to determine whether MAOSS-guided identification and recall of at-risk individuals can meaningfully improve fibrosis detection and optimize clinical care pathways for SLD.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

The AIG-SLD Screening Project is a single-arm, open-label, prospective interventional study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a MAOSS-guided identification and AI-human collaboration recall strategy for detecting individuals at intermediate or high risk of steatotic liver disease (SLD) and for assessing intervention outcomes. The trail will prospectively and consecutively enroll around 8000 eligible adults aged ≥18 years who undergo routine chest or abdominal non-contrast CT (NCCT) with adequate hepatic coverage .

The AI system i.e. MAOSS will be embedded within the standard clinical workflow to evaluate the real-world performance and the impact of AIG-SLD screening. All eligible NCCT scans will be evaluated through two parallel streams:

  1. Standard of Care (SoC) workflow: Radiologists perform independent assessments, first-line radiologists review followed by a senior radiologist finalizing the report.
  2. AIG workflow: The MAOSS system simultaneously analyzes the identical imaging data in real-time.

The system screens patients with clinically suspected SLD by flagging those with a MAOSS score ≥1.6 and a FIBRO Score ≥1.7 for recall. These algorithmic flags will be compared against radiologists' determinations of clinically significant SLD. Management pathways are defined as follows: (1) Concordant cases: If the Standard of Care (SoC) and the AIG pathway agree (both recommending recall or both recommending no recall), the agreed-upon decision will be executed. (2) Discordant cases: If the SoC and AIG pathways disagree, patients will be recalled for primary hepatology care to ensure safety.

Primary hepatology care begins with the collection of questionnaires regarding medical history, lifestyle, alcohol consumption, and metabolic risks (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, obesity, metabolic syndrome, significant alcohol consumption, or viral hepatitis) followed by further serum laboratory tests and Transient Elastography (e.g., FibroScan). Recalled patients will be managed according to the MAOSS pathway starting with FIB-4 stratification (<1.3, 1.3-2.67, >2.67), followed by FAST stratification (<0.35, ≥0.35) as needed. Intermediate-to-high-risk patients will proceed to escalated care involving MRE, MRI-PDFF, or liver biopsy. Management is then determined by MRE-derived Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM): patients with LSM < 3.5 kPa will receive lifestyle interventions and annual reassessment; those with LSM 3.5-5.0 kPa (F2-F3) will receive pharmacological or therapeutic interventions; and those with LSM ≥ 5.0 kPa (F4) will undergo cirrhosis-based management. Patients in the latter two groups will be reassessed every six months to monitor changes in steatosis and fibrosis.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

7969

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, Porcelana, 110004
        • Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged ≥18 years undergoing routine non-contrast or contrast-enhanced chest or abdominal CT examination.
  • CT images with adequate hepatic coverage and sufficient image quality for MAOSS analysis.
  • Willing to undergo the recall evaluation and either: having a FIB-4 result within the past 1 month, or willing to complete blood testing (ALT, AST, platelet count) required for FIB-4 calculation and undergo FibroScan or MRE assessment.
  • Willing to participate in the study and able to provide written informed consent at the time of recall.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known malignant liver tumors (e.g., HCC, cholangiocarcinoma) or a history of liver transplantation or major hepatic resection.
  • Known cirrhosis based on noninvasive fibrosis assessment tests, liver biopsy or complications of decompensated disease, or with a documented history of cirrhosis identified by clinical notes will be excluded.
  • Biliary obstruction, acute cholangitis, or other conditions that may interfere with interpretation of liver biochemistry or fibrosis risk assessment.
  • CT images with severe artifacts or incomplete liver coverage preventing reliable MAOSS analysis.
  • Severe acute systemic illness (e.g., sepsis, shock, acute heart failure), or pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Unwilling or unable to complete recall procedures, including required blood tests, FibroScan, or MRE when indicated, or unable to comply with study follow-up.
  • Severe comorbidity with an expected survival of less than 1 year (e.g., terminal malignancy).

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Poner en pantalla
  • Asignación: N / A
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación de un solo grupo
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: AI-human collaboration for SLD screening
In the prospective analysis phase, all eligible NCCT scans will be evaluated through two parallel streams: 1. Standard of Care (SoC) workflow: Radiologists perform independent assessments as per standard clinical procedures (e.g., first-line radiologists' reviews followed by senior radiologist finalizing the report). 2. AIG workflow: The MAOSS system simultaneously analyzes the identical imaging data in real-time.
The system screens patients with clinically suspected SLD by flagging those with a MAOSS score ≥1.6 and a FIBRO Score ≥1.7 for recall. These algorithmic flags will be compared against radiologists' determinations of clinically significant SLD. Management pathways are defined as follows: (1) Concordant cases: If the Standard of Care (SoC) and the AIG pathway agree (both recommending recall or both recommending no recall), the agreed-upon decision will be executed. (2) Discordant cases: If the SoC and AIG pathways disagree, patients will be recalled for primary hepatology care to ensure safety and avoid potential missed diagnosis.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Effective referral yield for escalated hepatology care
Periodo de tiempo: 6 months
Effective referral yield: the proportion of patients referred for escalated hepatology care confirmed with clinically significant (or above) fibrosis by MRE/liver biposy. A non-inferiority test (and estimates of the associated absolute and relative differences) will be performed for effective referral yield between SoC and AIG workflow.
6 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Real-World Screening Specificity
Periodo de tiempo: Duration of the study (12 months)
A critical safety endpoint is to determine if AIG-SLD care pathway maintains a high specificity to prevent false referral, thereby avoiding unnecessary interventions.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Real-World Screening Sensitivity
Periodo de tiempo: Duration of the study (12 months)
A critical efficacy endpoint is to determine if AIG-SLD care pathway is sufficiently sensitive to identify patients who actually need interventions.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Real-World Screening Negative predictive value
Periodo de tiempo: Duration of the study (12 months)
This evaluates the AIG-SLD care pathway's ability to correctly exclude low-risk patients who actually do not need interventions.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Intervention Success (Fibrosis Reversion)
Periodo de tiempo: Duration of the study (12 months)
The proportion of patients referred for escalated care achieves fibrosis stage reversion.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Intervention Success (Steatosis Reversion)
Periodo de tiempo: Duration of the study (12 months)
The proportion of patients referred for escalated care achieves steatosis stage Reversion.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Quantitative Liver Stiffness Trends
Periodo de tiempo: Duration of the study (12 months)
The overall longitudinal changes in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) values for all patients referred to escalated care.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Quantitative Liver Steatosis Trends
Periodo de tiempo: Duration of the study (12 months)
The overall longitudinal changes in Liver Fat Content (CAP/PDFF) values for all patients referred to escalated care.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Intervention Patient Adherence
Periodo de tiempo: Duration of the study (12 months)
The overall intervention adherence rate for all patients referred to escalated care.
Duration of the study (12 months)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

24 de febrero de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

30 de agosto de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

24 de febrero de 2027

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

23 de mayo de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

23 de mayo de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

29 de mayo de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

29 de mayo de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

23 de mayo de 2026

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir