Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Interventional AI-Human Collaboration for Steatotic Liver Disease Screening

23 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Yu Shi, Shengjing Hospital

AI-Driven Opportunistic Screening and Risk-Adapted Management of Steatotic Liver Disease

Steatotic liver disease (SLD) is one of the most prevalent chronic liver diseases worldwide, affecting nearly 30% of the global population and projected to exceed 55% by 2040. Timely identification and management of intermediate- and high-risk SLD patients are essential, yet early detection remains challenging because current diagnostic modalities, such as biopsy, ultrasonography, and serum indices, are invasive, insensitive, operator-dependent, or difficult to scale. In contrast, non-contrast CT is widely available in routine care and offers substantial potential for opportunistic SLD screening, although this value has not been fully utilized. Our previously developed MAOSS model accurately identifies intermediate- and high-risk individuals, with MAOSS score≥1.6 combined with Fibro Score ≥1.7, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity in our large-scale retrospective study. However, despite these promising retrospective findings, the model has not undergone prospective interventional validation, and it remains unclear whether an AI-guided workflow can truly enhance clinical risk stratification, diagnostic yield, and downstream management in real-world SLD populations. Therefore, a prospective intervention study is needed to determine whether MAOSS-guided identification and recall of at-risk individuals can meaningfully improve fibrosis detection and optimize clinical care pathways for SLD.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

The AIG-SLD Screening Project is a single-arm, open-label, prospective interventional study designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a MAOSS-guided identification and AI-human collaboration recall strategy for detecting individuals at intermediate or high risk of steatotic liver disease (SLD) and for assessing intervention outcomes. The trail will prospectively and consecutively enroll around 8000 eligible adults aged ≥18 years who undergo routine chest or abdominal non-contrast CT (NCCT) with adequate hepatic coverage .

The AI system i.e. MAOSS will be embedded within the standard clinical workflow to evaluate the real-world performance and the impact of AIG-SLD screening. All eligible NCCT scans will be evaluated through two parallel streams:

  1. Standard of Care (SoC) workflow: Radiologists perform independent assessments, first-line radiologists review followed by a senior radiologist finalizing the report.
  2. AIG workflow: The MAOSS system simultaneously analyzes the identical imaging data in real-time.

The system screens patients with clinically suspected SLD by flagging those with a MAOSS score ≥1.6 and a FIBRO Score ≥1.7 for recall. These algorithmic flags will be compared against radiologists' determinations of clinically significant SLD. Management pathways are defined as follows: (1) Concordant cases: If the Standard of Care (SoC) and the AIG pathway agree (both recommending recall or both recommending no recall), the agreed-upon decision will be executed. (2) Discordant cases: If the SoC and AIG pathways disagree, patients will be recalled for primary hepatology care to ensure safety.

Primary hepatology care begins with the collection of questionnaires regarding medical history, lifestyle, alcohol consumption, and metabolic risks (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, obesity, metabolic syndrome, significant alcohol consumption, or viral hepatitis) followed by further serum laboratory tests and Transient Elastography (e.g., FibroScan). Recalled patients will be managed according to the MAOSS pathway starting with FIB-4 stratification (<1.3, 1.3-2.67, >2.67), followed by FAST stratification (<0.35, ≥0.35) as needed. Intermediate-to-high-risk patients will proceed to escalated care involving MRE, MRI-PDFF, or liver biopsy. Management is then determined by MRE-derived Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM): patients with LSM < 3.5 kPa will receive lifestyle interventions and annual reassessment; those with LSM 3.5-5.0 kPa (F2-F3) will receive pharmacological or therapeutic interventions; and those with LSM ≥ 5.0 kPa (F4) will undergo cirrhosis-based management. Patients in the latter two groups will be reassessed every six months to monitor changes in steatosis and fibrosis.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

7969

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110004
        • Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged ≥18 years undergoing routine non-contrast or contrast-enhanced chest or abdominal CT examination.
  • CT images with adequate hepatic coverage and sufficient image quality for MAOSS analysis.
  • Willing to undergo the recall evaluation and either: having a FIB-4 result within the past 1 month, or willing to complete blood testing (ALT, AST, platelet count) required for FIB-4 calculation and undergo FibroScan or MRE assessment.
  • Willing to participate in the study and able to provide written informed consent at the time of recall.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known malignant liver tumors (e.g., HCC, cholangiocarcinoma) or a history of liver transplantation or major hepatic resection.
  • Known cirrhosis based on noninvasive fibrosis assessment tests, liver biopsy or complications of decompensated disease, or with a documented history of cirrhosis identified by clinical notes will be excluded.
  • Biliary obstruction, acute cholangitis, or other conditions that may interfere with interpretation of liver biochemistry or fibrosis risk assessment.
  • CT images with severe artifacts or incomplete liver coverage preventing reliable MAOSS analysis.
  • Severe acute systemic illness (e.g., sepsis, shock, acute heart failure), or pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Unwilling or unable to complete recall procedures, including required blood tests, FibroScan, or MRE when indicated, or unable to comply with study follow-up.
  • Severe comorbidity with an expected survival of less than 1 year (e.g., terminal malignancy).

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Triagem
  • Alocação: N / D
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: AI-human collaboration for SLD screening
In the prospective analysis phase, all eligible NCCT scans will be evaluated through two parallel streams: 1. Standard of Care (SoC) workflow: Radiologists perform independent assessments as per standard clinical procedures (e.g., first-line radiologists' reviews followed by senior radiologist finalizing the report). 2. AIG workflow: The MAOSS system simultaneously analyzes the identical imaging data in real-time.
The system screens patients with clinically suspected SLD by flagging those with a MAOSS score ≥1.6 and a FIBRO Score ≥1.7 for recall. These algorithmic flags will be compared against radiologists' determinations of clinically significant SLD. Management pathways are defined as follows: (1) Concordant cases: If the Standard of Care (SoC) and the AIG pathway agree (both recommending recall or both recommending no recall), the agreed-upon decision will be executed. (2) Discordant cases: If the SoC and AIG pathways disagree, patients will be recalled for primary hepatology care to ensure safety and avoid potential missed diagnosis.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Effective referral yield for escalated hepatology care
Prazo: 6 months
Effective referral yield: the proportion of patients referred for escalated hepatology care confirmed with clinically significant (or above) fibrosis by MRE/liver biposy. A non-inferiority test (and estimates of the associated absolute and relative differences) will be performed for effective referral yield between SoC and AIG workflow.
6 months

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Real-World Screening Specificity
Prazo: Duration of the study (12 months)
A critical safety endpoint is to determine if AIG-SLD care pathway maintains a high specificity to prevent false referral, thereby avoiding unnecessary interventions.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Real-World Screening Sensitivity
Prazo: Duration of the study (12 months)
A critical efficacy endpoint is to determine if AIG-SLD care pathway is sufficiently sensitive to identify patients who actually need interventions.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Real-World Screening Negative predictive value
Prazo: Duration of the study (12 months)
This evaluates the AIG-SLD care pathway's ability to correctly exclude low-risk patients who actually do not need interventions.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Intervention Success (Fibrosis Reversion)
Prazo: Duration of the study (12 months)
The proportion of patients referred for escalated care achieves fibrosis stage reversion.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Intervention Success (Steatosis Reversion)
Prazo: Duration of the study (12 months)
The proportion of patients referred for escalated care achieves steatosis stage Reversion.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Quantitative Liver Stiffness Trends
Prazo: Duration of the study (12 months)
The overall longitudinal changes in Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM) values for all patients referred to escalated care.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Quantitative Liver Steatosis Trends
Prazo: Duration of the study (12 months)
The overall longitudinal changes in Liver Fat Content (CAP/PDFF) values for all patients referred to escalated care.
Duration of the study (12 months)
Intervention Patient Adherence
Prazo: Duration of the study (12 months)
The overall intervention adherence rate for all patients referred to escalated care.
Duration of the study (12 months)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

24 de fevereiro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

30 de agosto de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

24 de fevereiro de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

23 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

23 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

29 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

29 de maio de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

23 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever