Inferior Vena Cava Versus Subclavian Vein Collapsibility for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Trauma Hemorrhagic Shock
Comparison of Inferior Vena Cava Versus Subclavian Vein Collapsibility Indices for Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Adult Trauma Patients Presenting With Hemorrhagic Shock: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study
Hemorrhagic shock from severe bleeding is a leading cause of preventable death in trauma patients. Intravenous (IV) fluid resuscitation is essential for stabilizing blood pressure and organ perfusion, but administering too much or too little fluid can cause severe complications. Only about half of hemodynamically unstable patients show an increase in cardiac output after receiving fluids. Emergency physicians often use bedside ultrasound to measure respiratory changes in the inferior vena cava (IVC), known as the IVC collapsibility index (IVC-CI), to predict whether a patient will benefit from fluids. However, obtaining clear IVC views can be difficult or impossible in trauma patients due to abdominal pain, obesity, or abdominal injuries. Evaluating the subclavian vein (SCV) under the collarbone provides a potential alternative window.
The main purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the subclavian vein collapsibility index (SCV-CI) against the inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) for predicting fluid responsiveness in adult trauma patients presenting with hemorrhagic shock.
Eligible adult trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock will undergo rapid bedside point-of-care ultrasound upon presentation to the emergency department. Physicians will measure respiratory diameter variations in both the subclavian vein and inferior vena cava. Patients will then receive a standardized fluid challenge of 10 mL/kg intravenous balanced crystalloid solution over 10 to 15 minutes as part of resuscitation. Fluid responsiveness will be assessed by measuring changes in blood flow through the neck using carotid artery Doppler ultrasound before and 5 to 10 minutes after the fluid challenge. The study will determine whether subclavian vein ultrasound offers comparable diagnostic performance and greater feasibility compared to inferior vena cava ultrasound in emergency trauma resuscitation.
調査の概要
研究の種類
入学 (推定)
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
- 大人
- 高齢者
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
サンプリング方法
調査対象母集団
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients aged 18 years or older.
- Presentation with blunt or penetrating trauma.
- Clinical evidence of hemorrhagic shock, defined by hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg or mean arterial pressure < 65 mmHg), tachycardia, or other clinical signs of tissue hypoperfusion requiring fluid resuscitation.
- Spontaneously breathing patients.
- Presentation to the Emergency Department within 6 hours of injury.
- Feasibility of bedside point-of-care ultrasound examination prior to the initiation of definitive resuscitation.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age younger than 18 years.
- Pregnancy.
- Requirement for immediate endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation prior to ultrasound assessment.
- Obstructive shock due to cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax, or other known causes.
- Known severe heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%.
- Significant tricuspid regurgitation or known pulmonary hypertension that may affect systemic venous measurements.
- Major neck or clavicular trauma preventing adequate subclavian vein ultrasound acquisition.
- Extensive abdominal trauma, morbid obesity, or other conditions precluding adequate inferior vena cava (IVC) acoustic visualization.
- Transfer from another facility after receiving large-volume fluid resuscitation (> 1 L of crystalloids or blood products prior to assessment).
- Inability or refusal to provide informed consent by the patient or their legally authorized representative.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか？
デザインの詳細
コホートと介入
グループ/コホート |
|---|
|
Adult Trauma Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock
Spontaneously breathing adult trauma patients (aged ≥ 18 years) presenting to the Emergency Department within 6 hours of blunt or penetrating injury with clinical evidence of hemorrhagic shock (SBP < 90 mmHg or MAP < 65 mmHg, tachycardia, or tissue hypoperfusion).
All enrolled participants undergo baseline point-of-care ultrasound examination to measure both the inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVC-CI) and subclavian vein collapsibility index (SCV-CI), in addition to carotid artery velocity time integral (Carotid VTI).
Following baseline ultrasound, participants receive a standardized fluid challenge of 10 mL/kg intravenous balanced crystalloid over 10-15 minutes.
Carotid VTI is remeasured within 5-10 minutes post-infusion to evaluate fluid responsiveness (defined as a Carotid VTI increase ≥ 15%).
|
この研究は何を測定していますか？
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) of Subclavian Vein Collapsibility Index (SCV-CI)
時間枠：10 minutes post-fluid challenge
|
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) will be calculated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of baseline SCV-CI for predicting fluid responsiveness.
Fluid responsiveness is defined as an increase of ≥ 15% in carotid artery velocity time integral (Carotid VTI) following a 10 mL/kg crystalloid bolus.
AUC values range from 0.5 (no discriminative ability) to 1.0 (perfect diagnostic accuracy).
|
10 minutes post-fluid challenge
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始 (推定)
一次修了 (推定)
研究の完了 (推定)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (実際)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (実際)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
本研究に関する用語
キーワード
その他の研究ID番号
- IVC vs SCV for Fluid Response
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。