Intervention Targeting Parental Reminiscing and Its Effects on Preschoolers' Memory and Metacognition
2021년 8월 31일 업데이트: Christina Leonard, University of Liege
Training Parents in an Elaborative Reminiscing Style to Boost Preschoolers' Development of Memory and Metacognition: A Randomized Controlled Study
This randomized controlled study aims to investigate the effects of an intervention targeting parental reminiscing style on preschoolers' memory (i.e., episodic and autobiographical) and metacognition (i.e., confidence judgment and memorability-based heuristic).
연구 개요
상세 설명
It has been demonstrated that parental reminiscing plays an important role in preschoolers' cognitive development among which memory (Waters & al., 2019). Specifically, both correlational and interventional studies show that children of parents using a high-elaborative style during reminiscing (i.e., frequent, detailed and collaborative discussions about the past) recount their memories in a more detailed and coherent way (Wu & Jobson, 2019). Besides, some correlational studies (e.g., Langley et al., 2017) seem to also reveal an effect of parental reminiscing on children's ability to learn new information, as assessed in clinical neuropsychology by episodic memory tasks. However, the mechanisms underlying these influences are currently unclear. Indeed, several non-mutually exclusive hypotheses are frequently suggested (e.g., among which the development of metacognition (Rudek & Haden, 2005)) but, to date, have never been tested. Identifying these mechanisms could contribute to design interventions targeting parental reminiscing and to determine in which clinical contexts to use them. Currently, interventional studies in the field are scarce (for a review, see Corsano & Guidotti, 2019) and lack of consensus.
The primary aims of the present study are multiple. First, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief intervention program to improve the way parents reminisce with their child. After the intervention, we expect an increase in the frequency of use of the targeted behaviors and thus an increase in the level of parental elaboration. The second goal of this study is to explore the effects of the improvements in parental reminiscing style on children's memory skills, both autobiographical memory (i.e., ability to recount one's own memories) and episodic memory (i.e., ability to learn new information). Regarding autobiographical memory, we anticipate to replicate the results shown in other interventional studies (i.e., an increase in the amount of information reported by children at the end of the intervention; for a review, see Corsano & Guidotti, 2019). Regarding episodic memory, based on the results of correlational studies (e.g., Léonard et al., in prep), we anticipate after the intervention to show among children an improved ability to learn new information. Beyond these primary aims, secondary aims are also targeted in this study. Currently, the mechanisms underlying the relation between parental reminiscing and child's memory are still relatively unknown. A hypothesis that is frequently suggested is the development of metacognition (Rudek & Haden, 2005). One purpose of this study is to test this assumption by focusing on 2 metacognitive skills that develop during the preschool years: (a) the ability to make confidence judgments, (b) the ability to use the memorability-based heuristic. After the intervention, we expect children to make more accurate confidence judgments and to use more successfully the memorability-based heuristic to guide their memory decisions. Therefore, we may obtain information on the active ingredients of the relation between parental reminiscing and memory. Then, in an exploratory way, we explore whether such an intervention could improve parental cognitions as well as parents' perception of reminiscing with their child. We anticipate an improvement in parental cognitions and a more positive perception of reminiscing. Finally, we are interested in assessing parents' adherence to the intervention by exploring their feelings about its format, content and feasibility in daily life.
For all these purposes, a randomized controlled trial is currently being conducted. 2 experimental groups have been created and parent-child dyads were assigned to one of them using a stratified randomization on children's age and when possible on children's gender. Participants from both groups begin the study with an assessment of all variables of interest (i.e., baseline1). Immediately after this baseline assessment, participants from Group 1 receive the intervention. Participants from Group 2 (i.e., a waiting-list group acting as a control group) receive exactly the same intervention but later (i.e., after a second baseline assessment which is held after the completion of the intervention by the Group 1). Approximatively 2 weeks after the intervention, the dyads in each group undergo a post-intervention assessment (i.e., follow-up 1; similar to the baseline assessments). Besides, 6 months later, the Group 1 will participate in a follow-up session to check the persistence of the effects over time (i.e., follow-up 2). If the intervention is successful, this long-term follow-up may allow us to show either the maintenance of effects over time (e.g., an increase in parental elaboration) and/or the appearance of some effects (e.g., effects on child outcomes due to the time it takes for the improvement in parental style to have an effect on them).
In this study, all parents are provided with an 8-session intervention (i.e., 1 session/week) targeting different aspects of parental reminiscing: (a) the promotion of child participation (e.g., through parent's use of feedbacks), (b) the structure of reminiscing (e.g., parent's use of open-ended questions) and (c) the content addressed during reminiscing (e.g., contextual information). Parents learn to use the target behaviors through different standardized techniques: (a) psychoeducation, (b) modeling and (c) supervised practice. Due to Covid-19 epidemic, the intervention is held completely online (i.e., 4 e-learnings and 4 videoconferencing sessions).
연구 유형
중재적
등록 (실제)
40
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.
연구 장소
-
-
-
Liège, 벨기에, 4000
- University of Liege
-
-
참여기준
연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
3년 (어린이)
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
예
연구 대상 성별
모두
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children: French as mother tong
- Parent : be the parent who talks the most with the child (if both parents speak equally, the choice of the participating parent is left to them)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children: major cognitive or language difficulties at the time of the study and attested by a neuropsychological or language assessment
- Children: actual medication that may lead to cognitive difficulties
공부 계획
이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 다른
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 크로스오버 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Group 1
In this condition, the intervention is administered immediately after the baseline.
|
8-session intervention (i.e., 1 session/week) targeting 3 main aspects of parental reminiscing: the promotion of child participation, the structure of discussions about the past and the content addressed during these discussions.
Different learning techniques are used: psychoeducation, modeling and supervised practice.
|
|
실험적: Group 2 (waiting-list group)
This group is both a control and an experimental group.
Indeed, the intervention (i.e., the same as for group 1) is administered but after a second baseline which is held after the completion of the Group 1.
This condition will allow to check the specific efficiency of the intervention.
|
8-session intervention (i.e., 1 session/week) targeting 3 main aspects of parental reminiscing: the promotion of child participation, the structure of discussions about the past and the content addressed during these discussions.
Different learning techniques are used: psychoeducation, modeling and supervised practice.
|
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Parental reminiscing style
기간: Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Filmed parent-child discussion about a shared event of the previous day (as naturally as possible, without time constraint and in absence of the experimenter).
These discussions will be transcribed for analysis with a specific coding scheme.
Index : based on various raw scores, indexes will be computed.
|
Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Parental reminiscing style
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Filmed parent-child discussion about a shared event of the previous day (as naturally as possible, without time constraint and in absence of the experimenter).
These discussions will be transcribed for analysis with a specific coding scheme.
Index : based on various raw scores, indexes will be computed.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Parental reminiscing style
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
Filmed parent-child discussion about a shared event of the previous day (as naturally as possible, without time constraint and in absence of the experimenter).
These discussions will be transcribed for analysis with a specific coding scheme.
Index : based on various raw scores, indexes will be computed.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
|
Parental reminiscing style
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
Filmed parent-child discussion about a shared event of the previous day (as naturally as possible, without time constraint and in absence of the experimenter).
These discussions will be transcribed for analysis with a specific coding scheme.
Index : based on various raw scores, indexes will be computed.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Parental reminiscing style
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Filmed parent-child discussion about a shared event of the previous day (as naturally as possible, without time constraint and in absence of the experimenter).
These discussions will be transcribed for analysis with a specific coding scheme.
Index : based on various raw scores, indexes will be computed.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Parental reminiscing style
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Filmed parent-child discussion about a shared event of the previous day (as naturally as possible, without time constraint and in absence of the experimenter).
These discussions will be transcribed for analysis with a specific coding scheme.
Index : based on various raw scores, indexes will be computed.
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Explicit knowledge about parental reminiscing
기간: Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
10-item questionnaire aimed to assess parents' explicit knowledge about how to effectively discuss the past with their child (i.e., each item consists in a scenario and parents have to choose among different options which one would be the best way to interact with their child).
3 parallel versions of this questionnaire were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : number of correct responses.
|
Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Explicit knowledge about parental reminiscing
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
10-item questionnaire aimed to assess parents' explicit knowledge about how to effectively discuss the past with their child (i.e., each item consists in a scenario and parents have to choose among different options which one would be the best way to interact with their child).
3 parallel versions of this questionnaire were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : number of correct responses.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Explicit knowledge about parental reminiscing
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
10-item questionnaire aimed to assess parents' explicit knowledge about how to effectively discuss the past with their child (i.e., each item consists in a scenario and parents have to choose among different options which one would be the best way to interact with their child).
3 parallel versions of this questionnaire were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : number of correct responses.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
|
Explicit knowledge about parental reminiscing
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
10-item questionnaire aimed to assess parents' explicit knowledge about how to effectively discuss the past with their child (i.e., each item consists in a scenario and parents have to choose among different options which one would be the best way to interact with their child).
3 parallel versions of this questionnaire were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : number of correct responses.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Explicit knowledge about parental reminiscing
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
10-item questionnaire aimed to assess parents' explicit knowledge about how to effectively discuss the past with their child (i.e., each item consists in a scenario and parents have to choose among different options which one would be the best way to interact with their child).
3 parallel versions of this questionnaire were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : number of correct responses.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Explicit knowledge about parental reminiscing
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
10-item questionnaire aimed to assess parents' explicit knowledge about how to effectively discuss the past with their child (i.e., each item consists in a scenario and parents have to choose among different options which one would be the best way to interact with their child).
3 parallel versions of this questionnaire were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : number of correct responses.
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Children's autobiographical memory
기간: Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Retrieval of autobiographical memories cued by words (i.e., food, play, family, friend, happy, cry). 2 words/assessment (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Children's production will be analyzed through a specific coding scheme.
Index : the nature and the richness of information addressed by children.
|
Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Children's autobiographical memory
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Retrieval of autobiographical memories cued by words (i.e., food, play, family, friend, happy, cry). 2 words/assessment (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Children's production will be analyzed through a specific coding scheme.
Index : the nature and the richness of information addressed by children.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Children's autobiographical memory
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
Retrieval of autobiographical memories cued by words (i.e., food, play, family, friend, happy, cry). 2 words/assessment (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Children's production will be analyzed through a specific coding scheme.
Index : the nature and the richness of information addressed by children.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
|
Children's autobiographical memory
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
Retrieval of autobiographical memories cued by words (i.e., food, play, family, friend, happy, cry). 2 words/assessment (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Children's production will be analyzed through a specific coding scheme.
Index : the nature and the richness of information addressed by children.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Children's autobiographical memory
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Retrieval of autobiographical memories cued by words (i.e., food, play, family, friend, happy, cry). 2 words/assessment (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Children's production will be analyzed through a specific coding scheme.
Index : the nature and the richness of information addressed by children.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Children's autobiographical memory
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Retrieval of autobiographical memories cued by words (i.e., food, play, family, friend, happy, cry). 2 words/assessment (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Children's production will be analyzed through a specific coding scheme.
Index : the nature and the richness of information addressed by children.
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (1)
기간: Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through the House Test (Picard et al., 2012) and 2 parallel versions created by our research team for this study (i.e., order counterbalanced).
These tasks include an encoding phase and a retrieval phase in the form of free-recall and recognition after a 10-minute delay Index : number of correct responses at the free-recall task and the recognition task.
|
Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (1)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through the House Test (Picard et al., 2012) and 2 parallel versions created by our research team for this study (i.e., order counterbalanced).
These tasks include an encoding phase and a retrieval phase in the form of free-recall and recognition after a 10-minute delay Index : number of correct responses at the free-recall task and the recognition task.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (1)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through the House Test (Picard et al., 2012) and 2 parallel versions created by our research team for this study (i.e., order counterbalanced).
These tasks include an encoding phase and a retrieval phase in the form of free-recall and recognition after a 10-minute delay Index : number of correct responses at the free-recall task and the recognition task.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (1)
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through the House Test (Picard et al., 2012) and 2 parallel versions created by our research team for this study (i.e., order counterbalanced).
These tasks include an encoding phase and a retrieval phase in the form of free-recall and recognition after a 10-minute delay Index : number of correct responses at the free-recall task and the recognition task.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (1)
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through the House Test (Picard et al., 2012) and 2 parallel versions created by our research team for this study (i.e., order counterbalanced).
These tasks include an encoding phase and a retrieval phase in the form of free-recall and recognition after a 10-minute delay Index : number of correct responses at the free-recall task and the recognition task.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (1)
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through the House Test (Picard et al., 2012) and 2 parallel versions created by our research team for this study (i.e., order counterbalanced).
These tasks include an encoding phase and a retrieval phase in the form of free-recall and recognition after a 10-minute delay Index : number of correct responses at the free-recall task and the recognition task.
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (2)
기간: Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through a story-recall task which consists of listening to a story (i.e., encoding phase) immediately followed by a true-false recognition.
3 comparable story-recall tasks were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate sensitivity scores (i.e., reflecting children's ability to discriminate between studied information and lures).
|
Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (2)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through a story-recall task which consists of listening to a story (i.e., encoding phase) immediately followed by a true-false recognition.
3 comparable story-recall tasks were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate sensitivity scores (i.e., reflecting children's ability to discriminate between studied information and lures).
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (2)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through a story-recall task which consists of listening to a story (i.e., encoding phase) immediately followed by a true-false recognition.
3 comparable story-recall tasks were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate sensitivity scores (i.e., reflecting children's ability to discriminate between studied information and lures).
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (2)
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through a story-recall task which consists of listening to a story (i.e., encoding phase) immediately followed by a true-false recognition.
3 comparable story-recall tasks were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate sensitivity scores (i.e., reflecting children's ability to discriminate between studied information and lures).
|
Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (2)
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through a story-recall task which consists of listening to a story (i.e., encoding phase) immediately followed by a true-false recognition.
3 comparable story-recall tasks were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate sensitivity scores (i.e., reflecting children's ability to discriminate between studied information and lures).
|
Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Children's episodic memory (2)
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to learn new information through a story-recall task which consists of listening to a story (i.e., encoding phase) immediately followed by a true-false recognition.
3 comparable story-recall tasks were created (i.e., order counterbalanced).
Index : a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate sensitivity scores (i.e., reflecting children's ability to discriminate between studied information and lures).
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
2차 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Children's confidence judgments
기간: Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
In these tasks, for each memory decision, children have to rate their confidence in their decisions through a 2-point pictorial scale (for a study using this method, see Geurten & Bastin, 2019).
Index : the meta d'/d' ratio (Fleming & Lau, 2014) will be calculated to reflect children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments.
|
Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Children's confidence judgments
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
In these tasks, for each memory decision, children have to rate their confidence in their decisions through a 2-point pictorial scale (for a study using this method, see Geurten & Bastin, 2019).
Index : the meta d'/d' ratio (Fleming & Lau, 2014) will be calculated to reflect children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Children's confidence judgments
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
In these tasks, for each memory decision, children have to rate their confidence in their decisions through a 2-point pictorial scale (for a study using this method, see Geurten & Bastin, 2019).
Index : the meta d'/d' ratio (Fleming & Lau, 2014) will be calculated to reflect children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
|
Children's confidence judgments
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
In these tasks, for each memory decision, children have to rate their confidence in their decisions through a 2-point pictorial scale (for a study using this method, see Geurten & Bastin, 2019).
Index : the meta d'/d' ratio (Fleming & Lau, 2014) will be calculated to reflect children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Children's confidence judgments
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
In these tasks, for each memory decision, children have to rate their confidence in their decisions through a 2-point pictorial scale (for a study using this method, see Geurten & Bastin, 2019).
Index : the meta d'/d' ratio (Fleming & Lau, 2014) will be calculated to reflect children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Children's confidence judgments
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
In these tasks, for each memory decision, children have to rate their confidence in their decisions through a 2-point pictorial scale (for a study using this method, see Geurten & Bastin, 2019).
Index : the meta d'/d' ratio (Fleming & Lau, 2014) will be calculated to reflect children's ability to make accurate confidence judgments.
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic
기간: Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's use of the memorability-based heuristic when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
Indeed, this measure was allowed by the inclusion in each story of 8 low-memorable events and 8 high-memorable events.
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic was measured by contrasting their tendency to be more or less conservative in memory decisions for low-memorable versus high-memorable events.
Index: a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate response bias scores.
|
Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's use of the memorability-based heuristic when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
Indeed, this measure was allowed by the inclusion in each story of 8 low-memorable events and 8 high-memorable events.
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic was measured by contrasting their tendency to be more or less conservative in memory decisions for low-memorable versus high-memorable events.
Index: a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate response bias scores.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's use of the memorability-based heuristic when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
Indeed, this measure was allowed by the inclusion in each story of 8 low-memorable events and 8 high-memorable events.
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic was measured by contrasting their tendency to be more or less conservative in memory decisions for low-memorable versus high-memorable events.
Index: a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate response bias scores.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
|
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's use of the memorability-based heuristic when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
Indeed, this measure was allowed by the inclusion in each story of 8 low-memorable events and 8 high-memorable events.
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic was measured by contrasting their tendency to be more or less conservative in memory decisions for low-memorable versus high-memorable events.
Index: a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate response bias scores.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's use of the memorability-based heuristic when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
Indeed, this measure was allowed by the inclusion in each story of 8 low-memorable events and 8 high-memorable events.
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic was measured by contrasting their tendency to be more or less conservative in memory decisions for low-memorable versus high-memorable events.
Index: a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate response bias scores.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Assessment of children's use of the memorability-based heuristic when performing the aforementioned story-recall tasks.
Indeed, this measure was allowed by the inclusion in each story of 8 low-memorable events and 8 high-memorable events.
Children's use of the memorability-based heuristic was measured by contrasting their tendency to be more or less conservative in memory decisions for low-memorable versus high-memorable events.
Index: a signal detection analysis (Macmillan & Creelman, 2005) will be performed to calculate response bias scores.
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
기타 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Parents' perception of reminiscing with their child (exploratory)
기간: Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before intervention)
|
The first 5 words that come to parents' mind when they think about the discussions they have with their child about school days.
Index : the mean of valence of words (i.e., negative, neutral, positive) assessed by external judges.
|
Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before intervention)
|
|
Parents' perception of reminiscing with their child (exploratory)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
The first 5 words that come to parents' mind when they think about the discussions they have with their child about school days.
Index : the mean of valence of words (i.e., negative, neutral, positive) assessed by external judges.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Parents' perception of reminiscing with their child (exploratory)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
The first 5 words that come to parents' mind when they think about the discussions they have with their child about school days.
Index : the mean of valence of words (i.e., negative, neutral, positive) assessed by external judges.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
|
Parents' perception of reminiscing with their child (exploratory)
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
The first 5 words that come to parents' mind when they think about the discussions they have with their child about school days.
Index : the mean of valence of words (i.e., negative, neutral, positive) assessed by external judges.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Parents' perception of reminiscing with their child (exploratory)
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
The first 5 words that come to parents' mind when they think about the discussions they have with their child about school days.
Index : the mean of valence of words (i.e., negative, neutral, positive) assessed by external judges.
|
Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Parents' perception of reminiscing with their child (exploratory)
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
The first 5 words that come to parents' mind when they think about the discussions they have with their child about school days.
Index : the mean of valence of words (i.e., negative, neutral, positive) assessed by external judges.
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Parenting cognitions (exploratory)
기간: Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Assessment of parenting cognitions as defined by Bornstein et al. (2018) through visual analogue scales (e.g., parental self-efficacy, parental satisfaction, parenting knowledge, ...).
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Parenting cognitions (exploratory)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Assessment of parenting cognitions as defined by Bornstein et al. (2018) through visual analogue scales (e.g., parental self-efficacy, parental satisfaction, parenting knowledge, ...).
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Parenting cognitions (exploratory)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
Assessment of parenting cognitions as defined by Bornstein et al. (2018) through visual analogue scales (e.g., parental self-efficacy, parental satisfaction, parenting knowledge, ...).
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
|
Parenting cognitions (exploratory)
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
Assessment of parenting cognitions as defined by Bornstein et al. (2018) through visual analogue scales (e.g., parental self-efficacy, parental satisfaction, parenting knowledge, ...).
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Parenting cognitions (exploratory)
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 2 (2 weeks before the intervention)
|
Assessment of parenting cognitions as defined by Bornstein et al. (2018) through visual analogue scales (e.g., parental self-efficacy, parental satisfaction, parenting knowledge, ...).
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 2 : Baseline 2 (2 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Parenting cognitions (exploratory)
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Assessment of parenting cognitions as defined by Bornstein et al. (2018) through visual analogue scales (e.g., parental self-efficacy, parental satisfaction, parenting knowledge, ...).
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Parents' general feeling (exploratory)
기간: Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Visual analogue scales about parents' level of anxiety, depression, irritability and life satisfaction.
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 1 : Baseline 1 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Parents' general feeling (exploratory)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Visual analogue scales about parents' level of anxiety, depression, irritability and life satisfaction.
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Parents' general feeling (exploratory)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
Visual analogue scales about parents' level of anxiety, depression, irritability and life satisfaction.
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 2 (6 months after the intervention)
|
|
Parents' general feeling (exploratory)
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
Visual analogue scales about parents' level of anxiety, depression, irritability and life satisfaction.
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 2 : Baseline 1 (10 weeks before the intervention)
|
|
Parents' general feeling (exploratory)
기간: Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
Visual analogue scales about parents' level of anxiety, depression, irritability and life satisfaction.
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 2 : Baseline 2 (1 week before the intervention)
|
|
Parents' general feeling (exploratory)
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Visual analogue scales about parents' level of anxiety, depression, irritability and life satisfaction.
Index : position on visual analogue scales (from 0 to 10).
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Feasibility and adherence of the intervention (exploratory)
기간: Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Online questionnaire in the form of visual analogue scales (e.g., measure of the degree of ease with which the parents apply the target behaviors in daily life) and open-ended questions (e.g., barriers to the daily use of the target behaviors).
The drop-out rate will also be analyzed.
|
Group 1 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
|
Feasibility and adherence of the intervention (exploratory)
기간: Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
Online questionnaire in the form of visual analogue scales (e.g., measure of the degree of ease with which the parents apply the target behaviors in daily life) and open-ended questions (e.g., barriers to the daily use of the target behaviors).
The drop-out rate will also be analyzed.
|
Group 2 : Follow-up 1 (2 weeks after the intervention)
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.
수사관
- 연구 책임자: Marie Geurten, University of Liege
- 연구 책임자: Sylvie Willems, University of Liege
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.
일반 간행물
- Waters TEA, Camia C, Facompre CR, Fivush R. A meta-analytic examination of maternal reminiscing style: Elaboration, gender, and children's cognitive development. Psychol Bull. 2019 Nov;145(11):1082-1102. doi: 10.1037/bul0000211.
- Wu Y, Jobson L. Maternal reminiscing and child autobiographical memory elaboration: A meta-analytic review. Dev Psychol. 2019 Dec;55(12):2505-2521. doi: 10.1037/dev0000821. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
- Langley HA, Coffman JL, Ornstein PA. The Socialization of Children's Memory: Linking Maternal Conversational Style to the Development of Children's Autobiographical and Deliberate Memory Skills. J Cogn Dev. 2017;18(1):63-86. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2015.1135800. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
- Rudek DJ, Haden CA. Mothers' and Preschoolers' Mental State Language During Reminiscing Over Time. Merrill Palmer Q. 2005;51(4):557-583. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2005.0026
- Corsano P, Guidotti L. Parents' reminiscing training in typically developing and 'at-risk' children: a review. Early Child Dev Care. 2019; 189(1): 143-156. doin: 10.1080/03004430.2017.1289518
- Geurten M, Bastin C. Behaviors speak louder than explicit reports: Implicit metacognition in 2.5-year-old children. Dev Sci. 2019 Mar;22(2):e12742. doi: 10.1111/desc.12742. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
- Bornstein MH, Putnick DL, Suwalsky JTD. Parenting cognitions --> parenting practices --> child adjustment? The standard model. Dev Psychopathol. 2018 May;30(2):399-416. doi: 10.1017/S0954579417000931. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
연구 기록 날짜
이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
2021년 1월 21일
기본 완료 (예상)
2022년 1월 1일
연구 완료 (예상)
2022년 1월 1일
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
2021년 8월 31일
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
2021년 8월 31일
처음 게시됨 (실제)
2021년 9월 8일
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
2021년 9월 8일
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
2021년 8월 31일
마지막으로 확인됨
2021년 8월 1일
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- 1920-44
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
아니요
IPD 계획 설명
Data and analyses will be available from an online repository or from the principal investigator.
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
아니
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
아니
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .
부모-자녀 관계에 대한 임상 시험
-
Boehringer Ingelheim더 이상 사용할 수 없음폐 질환, 간질(소아 집단에서) | 소아 간질성 폐질환(chILD)
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon완전한Child-Pugh A 간세포 암종프랑스
-
CatalYm GmbH모병Child-Pugh A 간세포 암종 | 절제 불가능하거나 전이성 간세포암종 | 승인된 항 PD-(L)1 제제를 포함한 1차 치료 실패이탈리아, 독일
-
MindRank AI Ltd아직 모집하지 않음경증 및 중등증의 간 장애 (Child-Pugh 등급 A 및 B) | 간 기능 부전 (MeSH ID: D048550)중국
-
AstraZeneca종료됨위암 | 고급 고형 악성종양 | 고형종양 | Child-Pugh A~B7 진행성 간세포 암종 | EGFR 및/또는 ROS 돌연변이 NSCLC | 폐 전이 암종대한민국