이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Brief Online Training (BOLT) for Routine Outcome Monitoring

2021년 9월 2일 업데이트: Aaron Lyon, University of Washington
The goal of this project is to improve school-based services by developing and testing an online training and consultation system to facilitate the use of measurement-based care (also known and referenced in original grant as routine outcome monitoring). Measurement-based care (MBC) is the target intervention because it is an EBP with extensive empirical support for its ability to improve mental health service outcomes and is a feasible and cost-effective option. Following the iterative development of the BOLT training and consultation package (phases 1-4), the investigators will conduct a randomized control pilot trial (phase 5) to test the (1) impact of the package on MBC knowledge, attitudes and use, (2) impact of varying degrees of consultation dosage on weekly assessments of MBC use, and (3) moderators and mechanisms of impact.

연구 개요

상세 설명

In the US, although roughly one in five children experiences a mental health problem severe enough to warrant diagnosis and intervention, most lack access to needed services. Schools offer opportunities to improve service access, but school mental health clinicians are unlikely to deliver high-quality evidence-based practices (EBP). Multiple barriers interfere with clinicians receiving adequate training and support for EBP, including limited time and scarce training resources. The goal of this project is to improve school-based services by developing and testing an online training and consultation system to facilitate the use of measurement-based care (MBC). MBC is the target intervention because it is an EBP with extensive empirical support for its ability to improve mental health service outcomes and is a feasible and cost-effective option.

The larger study was conducted in phases to address study aims (this clinical trial record reflects Aim 3/Phase 5):

  • AIM 1: Phases 1 and 2. Develop the Brief On-Line Training (BOLT) for Measurement-Based Care training through prototyping and continuous user testing. The goal is to optimize BOLT's impact on system usability and clinician gains in MBC knowledge and attitudes.
  • AIM 2: Phases 3 and 4. Develop the BOLT post-training consultation procedures to optimize effective consultation.
  • AIM 3: Phase 5. Test BOLT by conducting a randomized controlled pilot trial of the full BOLT training/consultation package to test (1) its impact on MBC knowledge, attitudes, and use; (2) the impact of varying degrees of consultation dosage on weekly assessments of MBC use; and (3) moderators and mechanisms of impact: (a) system usability, (b) clinician knowledge and attitudes gain, (c) experience of collaboration, and (d) responsiveness of consultation.

During the final year (i.e., phase 5), participants include a sample of 75 clinicians, recruited from national email listservs in order to most closely approximate how clinicians tend to discover and engage in online training opportunities. Participants complete an initial online survey about their use of MBC in practice and are randomly assigned to participate in one of two study conditions: the BOLT condition (training and consultation) or a Control condition (no training and no consultation). Participants in the BOLT condition complete a self-paced Brief Online Training (BOLT) for Measurement-Based Care (MBC), are asked to begin to use MBC with their caseloads, and are then randomly assigned to one of three different consultation groups receiving 2 weeks, 4 weeks or 8 weeks of consultation. Participation in a consultation group includes participating in biweekly group phone consultations and posting weekly assignments on an online consultation discussion board about their use of MBC in practice. Participants in all BOLT groups and the Control condition complete weekly online surveys for the full 32 weeks of data collection.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (실제)

75

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 장소

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, 미국, 98115
        • University of Washington

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

22년 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 22-80 years of age
  • Employed as a School-Based Mental Health provider
  • Must routinely provide individual-level interventions or therapy to students and spend >50% of their time providing services in schools

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being younger than 22 or older than 80
  • Not being employed as a School-Based Mental Health provider
  • Don't provide individual-level interventions or therapy to students nor spend >50% of their time providing services in schools.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
  • 할당: 무작위
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
간섭 없음: 제어
개입 없음
실험적: BOLT + 1 PTC
BOLT Training + 1 PTC Call
BOLT is a Brief Online Training (BOLT) for Measurement-Based Care (MBC). Participants in the BOLT condition were subsequently randomized into varying amounts of post-training consultation (PTC).
실험적: BOLT + 2 PTC
BOLT Training + 2 PTC Calls
BOLT is a Brief Online Training (BOLT) for Measurement-Based Care (MBC). Participants in the BOLT condition were subsequently randomized into varying amounts of post-training consultation (PTC).
실험적: BOLT + 4 PTC
BOLT Training + 4 PTC Calls
BOLT is a Brief Online Training (BOLT) for Measurement-Based Care (MBC). Participants in the BOLT condition were subsequently randomized into varying amounts of post-training consultation (PTC).

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Current Assessment Practice Evaluation - Revised (CAPER) - Change of use of MBC
기간: Baseline, Weeks 2-32
The CAPER includes the original four-item CAPE measure plus three new items to assess use of individualized assessment. It assesses clinician self-reported use of the full range of MBC practices including administration of individualized/standardized assessments at different points during treatment, client feedback on assessment results, and using assessment results to inform treatment. All items are scored on a 1-4 scale, with anchors signifying percent of clients they used the practice with: 1 = None (0%), 2 = Some (1-39%), 3 = Half (40-60%), 4 = Most (61-100%).
Baseline, Weeks 2-32
Monitoring & Feedback Attitudes Scale (MFAS) - Change of attitudes about MBC use
기간: Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32
The purpose of this measure is to collect information on attitudes on routine progress monitoring (or measurement-based care). Monitoring and Feedback Attitudes Scale (MFA; Jensen-Doss, Becker, Smith, Lyon, Lewis, Stanick, & Hawley, 2018) responses range from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"). The MFA has two subscales: (1) Benefit (i.e., facilitating collaboration with clients) and (2) Harm (i.e., harmful for therapeutic alliance, misuse by administrators).
Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32
MBC Knowledge Questionnaire (MBCKQ) - Change of knowledge about MBC
기간: Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32
The purpose of this questionnaire is to measure MBC knowledge. The 28-item, multiple-choice MBCKQ was iteratively developed based on the key content and learning objectives of the MBC training modules.
Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32
Routine-Outcome Monitoring Skill - Change of skill of MBC use
기간: Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32
The purpose of this measure is to collect information on clinician familiarity and use of routine outcome monitoring (both individualized and standardized assessment tools). Items address selection of clients for administration as well as tool selection, administration, scoring, interpretation, integration into treatment, feedback, and progress monitoring. In previous samples, the scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .85). Responses are ratings about skill level and practice, ranging from 1 (''Minimal'') to 5 (''Advanced''). Items are averaged to create a total assessment skill score.
Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (실제)

2017년 2월 16일

기본 완료 (실제)

2019년 7월 16일

연구 완료 (실제)

2020년 12월 31일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2021년 8월 26일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2021년 9월 2일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2021년 9월 13일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2021년 9월 13일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2021년 9월 2일

마지막으로 확인됨

2021년 9월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 52550
  • R34MH109605 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

정신 건강 문제에 대한 임상 시험

BOLT + PTC에 대한 임상 시험

구독하다