このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

Brief Online Training (BOLT) for Routine Outcome Monitoring

2021年9月2日 更新者:Aaron Lyon、University of Washington
The goal of this project is to improve school-based services by developing and testing an online training and consultation system to facilitate the use of measurement-based care (also known and referenced in original grant as routine outcome monitoring). Measurement-based care (MBC) is the target intervention because it is an EBP with extensive empirical support for its ability to improve mental health service outcomes and is a feasible and cost-effective option. Following the iterative development of the BOLT training and consultation package (phases 1-4), the investigators will conduct a randomized control pilot trial (phase 5) to test the (1) impact of the package on MBC knowledge, attitudes and use, (2) impact of varying degrees of consultation dosage on weekly assessments of MBC use, and (3) moderators and mechanisms of impact.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

In the US, although roughly one in five children experiences a mental health problem severe enough to warrant diagnosis and intervention, most lack access to needed services. Schools offer opportunities to improve service access, but school mental health clinicians are unlikely to deliver high-quality evidence-based practices (EBP). Multiple barriers interfere with clinicians receiving adequate training and support for EBP, including limited time and scarce training resources. The goal of this project is to improve school-based services by developing and testing an online training and consultation system to facilitate the use of measurement-based care (MBC). MBC is the target intervention because it is an EBP with extensive empirical support for its ability to improve mental health service outcomes and is a feasible and cost-effective option.

The larger study was conducted in phases to address study aims (this clinical trial record reflects Aim 3/Phase 5):

  • AIM 1: Phases 1 and 2. Develop the Brief On-Line Training (BOLT) for Measurement-Based Care training through prototyping and continuous user testing. The goal is to optimize BOLT's impact on system usability and clinician gains in MBC knowledge and attitudes.
  • AIM 2: Phases 3 and 4. Develop the BOLT post-training consultation procedures to optimize effective consultation.
  • AIM 3: Phase 5. Test BOLT by conducting a randomized controlled pilot trial of the full BOLT training/consultation package to test (1) its impact on MBC knowledge, attitudes, and use; (2) the impact of varying degrees of consultation dosage on weekly assessments of MBC use; and (3) moderators and mechanisms of impact: (a) system usability, (b) clinician knowledge and attitudes gain, (c) experience of collaboration, and (d) responsiveness of consultation.

During the final year (i.e., phase 5), participants include a sample of 75 clinicians, recruited from national email listservs in order to most closely approximate how clinicians tend to discover and engage in online training opportunities. Participants complete an initial online survey about their use of MBC in practice and are randomly assigned to participate in one of two study conditions: the BOLT condition (training and consultation) or a Control condition (no training and no consultation). Participants in the BOLT condition complete a self-paced Brief Online Training (BOLT) for Measurement-Based Care (MBC), are asked to begin to use MBC with their caseloads, and are then randomly assigned to one of three different consultation groups receiving 2 weeks, 4 weeks or 8 weeks of consultation. Participation in a consultation group includes participating in biweekly group phone consultations and posting weekly assignments on an online consultation discussion board about their use of MBC in practice. Participants in all BOLT groups and the Control condition complete weekly online surveys for the full 32 weeks of data collection.

研究の種類

介入

入学 (実際)

75

段階

  • 適用できない

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究場所

    • Washington
      • Seattle、Washington、アメリカ、98115
        • University of Washington

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

22年~80年 (大人、高齢者)

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

いいえ

受講資格のある性別

全て

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 22-80 years of age
  • Employed as a School-Based Mental Health provider
  • Must routinely provide individual-level interventions or therapy to students and spend >50% of their time providing services in schools

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being younger than 22 or older than 80
  • Not being employed as a School-Based Mental Health provider
  • Don't provide individual-level interventions or therapy to students nor spend >50% of their time providing services in schools.

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

  • 主な目的:ヘルスサービス研究
  • 割り当て:ランダム化
  • 介入モデル:並列代入
  • マスキング:なし(オープンラベル)

武器と介入

参加者グループ / アーム
介入・治療
介入なし:コントロール
介入なし
実験的:BOLT + 1 PTC
BOLT Training + 1 PTC Call
BOLT is a Brief Online Training (BOLT) for Measurement-Based Care (MBC). Participants in the BOLT condition were subsequently randomized into varying amounts of post-training consultation (PTC).
実験的:BOLT + 2 PTC
BOLT Training + 2 PTC Calls
BOLT is a Brief Online Training (BOLT) for Measurement-Based Care (MBC). Participants in the BOLT condition were subsequently randomized into varying amounts of post-training consultation (PTC).
実験的:BOLT + 4 PTC
BOLT Training + 4 PTC Calls
BOLT is a Brief Online Training (BOLT) for Measurement-Based Care (MBC). Participants in the BOLT condition were subsequently randomized into varying amounts of post-training consultation (PTC).

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Current Assessment Practice Evaluation - Revised (CAPER) - Change of use of MBC
時間枠:Baseline, Weeks 2-32
The CAPER includes the original four-item CAPE measure plus three new items to assess use of individualized assessment. It assesses clinician self-reported use of the full range of MBC practices including administration of individualized/standardized assessments at different points during treatment, client feedback on assessment results, and using assessment results to inform treatment. All items are scored on a 1-4 scale, with anchors signifying percent of clients they used the practice with: 1 = None (0%), 2 = Some (1-39%), 3 = Half (40-60%), 4 = Most (61-100%).
Baseline, Weeks 2-32
Monitoring & Feedback Attitudes Scale (MFAS) - Change of attitudes about MBC use
時間枠:Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32
The purpose of this measure is to collect information on attitudes on routine progress monitoring (or measurement-based care). Monitoring and Feedback Attitudes Scale (MFA; Jensen-Doss, Becker, Smith, Lyon, Lewis, Stanick, & Hawley, 2018) responses range from 1 ("Strongly Disagree") to 5 ("Strongly Agree"). The MFA has two subscales: (1) Benefit (i.e., facilitating collaboration with clients) and (2) Harm (i.e., harmful for therapeutic alliance, misuse by administrators).
Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32
MBC Knowledge Questionnaire (MBCKQ) - Change of knowledge about MBC
時間枠:Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32
The purpose of this questionnaire is to measure MBC knowledge. The 28-item, multiple-choice MBCKQ was iteratively developed based on the key content and learning objectives of the MBC training modules.
Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32
Routine-Outcome Monitoring Skill - Change of skill of MBC use
時間枠:Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32
The purpose of this measure is to collect information on clinician familiarity and use of routine outcome monitoring (both individualized and standardized assessment tools). Items address selection of clients for administration as well as tool selection, administration, scoring, interpretation, integration into treatment, feedback, and progress monitoring. In previous samples, the scale had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .85). Responses are ratings about skill level and practice, ranging from 1 (''Minimal'') to 5 (''Advanced''). Items are averaged to create a total assessment skill score.
Baseline, Weeks: 2,4,6,8,10,16,20,24,28,32

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2017年2月16日

一次修了 (実際)

2019年7月16日

研究の完了 (実際)

2020年12月31日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2021年8月26日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2021年9月2日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2021年9月13日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2021年9月13日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2021年9月2日

最終確認日

2021年9月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • 52550
  • R34MH109605 (米国 NIH グラント/契約)

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

メンタルヘルスの問題の臨床試験

BOLT + PTCの臨床試験

3
購読する