대처 중재 구성 요소의 효과를 테스트하기 위한 요인 최적화 시도
정신 건강 문제의 위험을 줄이기 위해 이혼 후 부모 간 갈등에 노출된 아동의 효과적인 대처 촉진
This study will identify components for inclusion in a coping intervention package to reduce mental health problems among children exposed to high interparental conflict after parental separation/divorce. Reappraisal, distraction, and relaxation coping strategies are related to fewer mental health problems among children, making intervention components based on these strategies key candidates for inclusion in an optimized coping intervention. The primary aim is to experimentally assess the main and interactive effects of three digital intervention coping components (reappraisal, distraction, relaxation) on children's coping efficacy, emotional security, and internalizing and externalizing problems. Secondary aims are to assess indirect effects of the intervention components on children's coping efficacy, emotional security, and internalizing and externalizing problems through their cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions to post-separation/divorce interparental conflict events.
연구 개요
상태
상세 설명
A randomized and counterbalanced 2x2x2 factorial trial (N = 144 children, ages 9-12) will be conducted to assess the individual effects of the three digital coping intervention components. The three components to be tested will be: (1) Reappraisal (No vs. Yes), (2) Distraction (No vs. Yes), (3) Relaxation (No vs. Yes). Components that meet a priori thresholds for meaningful change will be combined to form an intervention package that will be evaluated in a subsequent randomized controlled trial.
연구 유형
등록 (실제)
단계
- 해당 없음
연락처 및 위치
연구 장소
-
-
Arizona
-
Tempe, Arizona, 미국, 85087
- Arizona State University
-
-
참여기준
자격 기준
공부할 수 있는 나이
건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다
연구 대상 성별
설명
Inclusion Criteria:
- child between ages 9-12 whose parents are separated or divorced
- child and one parent are fluent in English
- a parent with sufficient contact (i.e., at least 4 overnights and/or 12 daytime visits per month) with child who is willing to complete study assessments and has legal right to give permission for the child to participate in research
- child-report of high exposure to IPC (mean Z score ≥ 40th percentile on the two child report measures of IPC; score standardization based on data from 559 youth whose parents participated in an experimental parenting program)
- elevated internalizing or externalizing problems (T score in the borderline clinical range according to either child or parent report on the BPM).
Exclusion Criteria:
- in active therapy
- score ≥ 99th percentile on either internalizing and externalizing problems subscale
- endorse suicidality (will be ineligible for the study and referred for treatment)
공부 계획
연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?
디자인 세부사항
- 주 목적: 방지
- 할당: 무작위
- 중재 모델: 요인 할당
- 마스킹: 하나의
무기와 개입
참가자 그룹 / 팔 |
개입 / 치료 |
|---|---|
|
실험적: Education
Participants will complete an educational digital module and no skills-based digital modules. |
This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module. |
|
실험적: Education + Reappraisal
Participants will complete an educational digital module and a skills-based digital module that teaches reappraisal coping. |
This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module. This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills. |
|
실험적: Education + Distraction
Participants will complete an educational digital module and a skills-based digital module that teaches distraction coping. |
This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module. This digital module will teach distraction coping skills. |
|
실험적: Education + Relaxation
Participants will complete an educational digital module and a skills-based digital module that teaches relaxation coping. |
This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module. This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills. |
|
실험적: Education + Reappraisal + Distraction
Participants will complete an educational digital module and two skills-based digital modules, one that teaches reappraisal coping and one that teaches distraction coping. |
This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module. This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills. This digital module will teach distraction coping skills. |
|
실험적: Education + Reappraisal + Relaxation
Participants will complete an educational digital module and two skills-based digital modules, one that teaches reappraisal coping and one that teaches relaxation coping. |
This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module. This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills. This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills. |
|
실험적: Education + Distraction + Relaxation
Participants will complete an educational digital module and two skills-based digital modules, one that teaches distraction coping and one that teaches relaxation coping. |
This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module. This digital module will teach distraction coping skills. This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills. |
|
실험적: Education + Reappraisal + Distraction + Relaxation
Participants will complete an educational digital module and three skills-based digital modules, one that teaches reappraisal coping, one that teaches distraction coping, and one that teaches relaxation coping. |
This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module. This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills. This digital module will teach distraction coping skills. This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills. |
연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?
주요 결과 측정
결과 측정 |
측정값 설명 |
기간 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Child-Reported Interparental Emotional Security Score on the SIS-SF at 3-Month Follow-Up
기간: approximately 3 months after posttest
|
Child-reported Security in the Interparental Subsystem Scale-Short Form (SIS-SF; Holt et al., 2020). The score is the mean of 17 items rated from 0 (not at all true) to 3 (very true for me). Higher scores indicate greater interparental emotional security (better outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; factorial analyses adjust for baseline SIS-SF and prespecified covariates. |
approximately 3 months after posttest
|
|
Mean Child-Reported Family Emotional Security Score on the SIFS at 3-Month Follow-Up
기간: approximately 3 months after posttest
|
Child-reported Security in the Family System Scale (SIFS; Forman & Davies, 2005). The score is the mean of 24 items rated from 0 (completely disagree) to 3 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate greater family emotional security (better outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline SIFS score and prespecified covariates. |
approximately 3 months after posttest
|
|
Mean Child-Reported Coping Efficacy Score on the CES at 3-Month Follow-Up
기간: approximately 3 months after posttest
|
Child-reported Coping Efficacy Scale (CES; Sandler et al., 2000). The score is the mean of 7 items rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very). Higher scores indicate greater coping efficacy (better outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline CES score and prespecified covariates. |
approximately 3 months after posttest
|
|
Mean Child-Reported Internalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
기간: approximately 3 months after posttest
|
Child-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Internalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 6 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more internalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline child-reported BPM Internalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates. |
approximately 3 months after posttest
|
|
Mean Parent-Reported Internalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
기간: approximately 3 months after posttest
|
Parent-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Internalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 6 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more internalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline parent-reported BPM Internalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates. |
approximately 3 months after posttest
|
|
Mean Child-Reported Externalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
기간: approximately 3 months after posttest
|
Child-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Externalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 7 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more externalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline child-reported BPM Externalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates. |
approximately 3 months after posttest
|
|
Mean Parent-Reported Externalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
기간: approximately 3 months after posttest
|
Parent-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Externalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 7 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more externalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline parent-reported BPM Externalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates. |
approximately 3 months after posttest
|
공동 작업자 및 조사자
수사관
- 수석 연구원: Karey L O'Hara, PhD, Arizona State University
간행물 및 유용한 링크
연구 기록 날짜
연구 주요 날짜
연구 시작 (실제)
기본 완료 (실제)
연구 완료 (실제)
연구 등록 날짜
최초 제출
QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출
처음 게시됨 (실제)
연구 기록 업데이트
마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)
QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출
마지막으로 확인됨
추가 정보
이 연구와 관련된 용어
기타 연구 ID 번호
- STUDY00016078
- K01MH120321 (미국 NIH 보조금/계약)
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획
개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?
IPD 계획 설명
Study results will be shared through presentations at conferences and submissions in peer-reviewed journals. In addition, after taking all steps necessary to minimize possible re-identification of confidential data, I will make data, codebooks, and analysis scripts available to appropriate parties to verify findings and conclusions.
IPD 공유 기간
one year post data collection
IPD 공유 액세스 기준
qualified researchers who have gained IRB approval and pre-registered their analyses
IPD 공유 지원 정보 유형
- 연구_프로토콜
- 수액
- ICF
- ANALYTIC_CODE
- CSR
약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서
미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구
미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구
이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .