Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Prova di ottimizzazione fattoriale per testare gli effetti dei componenti dell'intervento di coping

4 settembre 2026 aggiornato da: Karey O'Hara, Arizona State University

Promuovere un coping efficace da parte dei bambini esposti al conflitto interparentale post-divorzio per ridurre il rischio di problemi di salute mentale

This study will identify components for inclusion in a coping intervention package to reduce mental health problems among children exposed to high interparental conflict after parental separation/divorce. Reappraisal, distraction, and relaxation coping strategies are related to fewer mental health problems among children, making intervention components based on these strategies key candidates for inclusion in an optimized coping intervention. The primary aim is to experimentally assess the main and interactive effects of three digital intervention coping components (reappraisal, distraction, relaxation) on children's coping efficacy, emotional security, and internalizing and externalizing problems. Secondary aims are to assess indirect effects of the intervention components on children's coping efficacy, emotional security, and internalizing and externalizing problems through their cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions to post-separation/divorce interparental conflict events.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

A randomized and counterbalanced 2x2x2 factorial trial (N = 144 children, ages 9-12) will be conducted to assess the individual effects of the three digital coping intervention components. The three components to be tested will be: (1) Reappraisal (No vs. Yes), (2) Distraction (No vs. Yes), (3) Relaxation (No vs. Yes). Components that meet a priori thresholds for meaningful change will be combined to form an intervention package that will be evaluated in a subsequent randomized controlled trial.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Effettivo)

148

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

    • Arizona
      • Tempe, Arizona, Stati Uniti, 85087
        • Arizona State University

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

Da 9 anni a 12 anni (Bambino)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • child between ages 9-12 whose parents are separated or divorced
  • child and one parent are fluent in English
  • a parent with sufficient contact (i.e., at least 4 overnights and/or 12 daytime visits per month) with child who is willing to complete study assessments and has legal right to give permission for the child to participate in research
  • child-report of high exposure to IPC (mean Z score ≥ 40th percentile on the two child report measures of IPC; score standardization based on data from 559 youth whose parents participated in an experimental parenting program)
  • elevated internalizing or externalizing problems (T score in the borderline clinical range according to either child or parent report on the BPM).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • in active therapy
  • score ≥ 99th percentile on either internalizing and externalizing problems subscale
  • endorse suicidality (will be ineligible for the study and referred for treatment)

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Prevenzione
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione fattoriale
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: Education

Participants will complete an educational digital module and no skills-based digital modules.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

Sperimentale: Education + Reappraisal

Participants will complete an educational digital module and a skills-based digital module that teaches reappraisal coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills.

Sperimentale: Education + Distraction

Participants will complete an educational digital module and a skills-based digital module that teaches distraction coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach distraction coping skills.

Sperimentale: Education + Relaxation

Participants will complete an educational digital module and a skills-based digital module that teaches relaxation coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills.

Sperimentale: Education + Reappraisal + Distraction

Participants will complete an educational digital module and two skills-based digital modules, one that teaches reappraisal coping and one that teaches distraction coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills.

This digital module will teach distraction coping skills.

Sperimentale: Education + Reappraisal + Relaxation

Participants will complete an educational digital module and two skills-based digital modules, one that teaches reappraisal coping and one that teaches relaxation coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills.

This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills.

Sperimentale: Education + Distraction + Relaxation

Participants will complete an educational digital module and two skills-based digital modules, one that teaches distraction coping and one that teaches relaxation coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach distraction coping skills.

This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills.

Sperimentale: Education + Reappraisal + Distraction + Relaxation

Participants will complete an educational digital module and three skills-based digital modules, one that teaches reappraisal coping, one that teaches distraction coping, and one that teaches relaxation coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills.

This digital module will teach distraction coping skills.

This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Mean Child-Reported Interparental Emotional Security Score on the SIS-SF at 3-Month Follow-Up
Lasso di tempo: approximately 3 months after posttest

Child-reported Security in the Interparental Subsystem Scale-Short Form (SIS-SF; Holt et al., 2020). The score is the mean of 17 items rated from 0 (not at all true) to 3 (very true for me). Higher scores indicate greater interparental emotional security (better outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; factorial analyses adjust for baseline SIS-SF and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Child-Reported Family Emotional Security Score on the SIFS at 3-Month Follow-Up
Lasso di tempo: approximately 3 months after posttest

Child-reported Security in the Family System Scale (SIFS; Forman & Davies, 2005). The score is the mean of 24 items rated from 0 (completely disagree) to 3 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate greater family emotional security (better outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline SIFS score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Child-Reported Coping Efficacy Score on the CES at 3-Month Follow-Up
Lasso di tempo: approximately 3 months after posttest

Child-reported Coping Efficacy Scale (CES; Sandler et al., 2000). The score is the mean of 7 items rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very). Higher scores indicate greater coping efficacy (better outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline CES score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Child-Reported Internalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
Lasso di tempo: approximately 3 months after posttest

Child-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Internalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 6 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more internalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline child-reported BPM Internalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Parent-Reported Internalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
Lasso di tempo: approximately 3 months after posttest

Parent-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Internalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 6 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more internalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline parent-reported BPM Internalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Child-Reported Externalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
Lasso di tempo: approximately 3 months after posttest

Child-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Externalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 7 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more externalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline child-reported BPM Externalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Parent-Reported Externalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
Lasso di tempo: approximately 3 months after posttest

Parent-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Externalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 7 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more externalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline parent-reported BPM Externalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Karey L O'Hara, PhD, Arizona State University

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Effettivo)

18 febbraio 2023

Completamento primario (Effettivo)

30 marzo 2026

Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)

30 marzo 2026

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

17 febbraio 2023

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

8 aprile 2023

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

21 aprile 2023

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

30 settembre 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

4 settembre 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • STUDY00016078
  • K01MH120321 (Sovvenzione/contratto NIH degli Stati Uniti)

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

SÌ

Descrizione del piano IPD

Study results will be shared through presentations at conferences and submissions in peer-reviewed journals. In addition, after taking all steps necessary to minimize possible re-identification of confidential data, I will make data, codebooks, and analysis scripts available to appropriate parties to verify findings and conclusions.

Periodo di condivisione IPD

one year post data collection

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

qualified researchers who have gained IRB approval and pre-registered their analyses

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • LINFA
  • ICF
  • CODICE_ANALITICO
  • RSI

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Sottoscrivi