Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Faktorielle Optimierungsstudie zum Testen der Auswirkungen von Bewältigungsinterventionskomponenten

4. September 2026 aktualisiert von: Karey O'Hara, Arizona State University

Förderung einer effektiven Bewältigung von Kindern, die einem Konflikt zwischen den Eltern nach der Scheidung ausgesetzt sind, um das Risiko für psychische Gesundheitsprobleme zu verringern

This study will identify components for inclusion in a coping intervention package to reduce mental health problems among children exposed to high interparental conflict after parental separation/divorce. Reappraisal, distraction, and relaxation coping strategies are related to fewer mental health problems among children, making intervention components based on these strategies key candidates for inclusion in an optimized coping intervention. The primary aim is to experimentally assess the main and interactive effects of three digital intervention coping components (reappraisal, distraction, relaxation) on children's coping efficacy, emotional security, and internalizing and externalizing problems. Secondary aims are to assess indirect effects of the intervention components on children's coping efficacy, emotional security, and internalizing and externalizing problems through their cognitive, emotional, and behavioral reactions to post-separation/divorce interparental conflict events.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

A randomized and counterbalanced 2x2x2 factorial trial (N = 144 children, ages 9-12) will be conducted to assess the individual effects of the three digital coping intervention components. The three components to be tested will be: (1) Reappraisal (No vs. Yes), (2) Distraction (No vs. Yes), (3) Relaxation (No vs. Yes). Components that meet a priori thresholds for meaningful change will be combined to form an intervention package that will be evaluated in a subsequent randomized controlled trial.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

148

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Arizona
      • Tempe, Arizona, Vereinigte Staaten, 85087
        • Arizona State University

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

9 Jahre bis 12 Jahre (Kind)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • child between ages 9-12 whose parents are separated or divorced
  • child and one parent are fluent in English
  • a parent with sufficient contact (i.e., at least 4 overnights and/or 12 daytime visits per month) with child who is willing to complete study assessments and has legal right to give permission for the child to participate in research
  • child-report of high exposure to IPC (mean Z score ≥ 40th percentile on the two child report measures of IPC; score standardization based on data from 559 youth whose parents participated in an experimental parenting program)
  • elevated internalizing or externalizing problems (T score in the borderline clinical range according to either child or parent report on the BPM).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • in active therapy
  • score ≥ 99th percentile on either internalizing and externalizing problems subscale
  • endorse suicidality (will be ineligible for the study and referred for treatment)

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Verhütung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Fakultätszuweisung
  • Maskierung: Single

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Education

Participants will complete an educational digital module and no skills-based digital modules.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

Experimental: Education + Reappraisal

Participants will complete an educational digital module and a skills-based digital module that teaches reappraisal coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills.

Experimental: Education + Distraction

Participants will complete an educational digital module and a skills-based digital module that teaches distraction coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach distraction coping skills.

Experimental: Education + Relaxation

Participants will complete an educational digital module and a skills-based digital module that teaches relaxation coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills.

Experimental: Education + Reappraisal + Distraction

Participants will complete an educational digital module and two skills-based digital modules, one that teaches reappraisal coping and one that teaches distraction coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills.

This digital module will teach distraction coping skills.

Experimental: Education + Reappraisal + Relaxation

Participants will complete an educational digital module and two skills-based digital modules, one that teaches reappraisal coping and one that teaches relaxation coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills.

This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills.

Experimental: Education + Distraction + Relaxation

Participants will complete an educational digital module and two skills-based digital modules, one that teaches distraction coping and one that teaches relaxation coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach distraction coping skills.

This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills.

Experimental: Education + Reappraisal + Distraction + Relaxation

Participants will complete an educational digital module and three skills-based digital modules, one that teaches reappraisal coping, one that teaches distraction coping, and one that teaches relaxation coping.

This is a constant component; all participants will get a psychoeducation digital module.

This digital module will teach reappraisal coping skills.

This digital module will teach distraction coping skills.

This digital module will teach relaxation coping skills.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Mean Child-Reported Interparental Emotional Security Score on the SIS-SF at 3-Month Follow-Up
Zeitfenster: approximately 3 months after posttest

Child-reported Security in the Interparental Subsystem Scale-Short Form (SIS-SF; Holt et al., 2020). The score is the mean of 17 items rated from 0 (not at all true) to 3 (very true for me). Higher scores indicate greater interparental emotional security (better outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; factorial analyses adjust for baseline SIS-SF and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Child-Reported Family Emotional Security Score on the SIFS at 3-Month Follow-Up
Zeitfenster: approximately 3 months after posttest

Child-reported Security in the Family System Scale (SIFS; Forman & Davies, 2005). The score is the mean of 24 items rated from 0 (completely disagree) to 3 (completely agree). Higher scores indicate greater family emotional security (better outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline SIFS score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Child-Reported Coping Efficacy Score on the CES at 3-Month Follow-Up
Zeitfenster: approximately 3 months after posttest

Child-reported Coping Efficacy Scale (CES; Sandler et al., 2000). The score is the mean of 7 items rated from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very). Higher scores indicate greater coping efficacy (better outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline CES score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Child-Reported Internalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
Zeitfenster: approximately 3 months after posttest

Child-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Internalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 6 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more internalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline child-reported BPM Internalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Parent-Reported Internalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
Zeitfenster: approximately 3 months after posttest

Parent-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Internalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 6 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more internalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline parent-reported BPM Internalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Child-Reported Externalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
Zeitfenster: approximately 3 months after posttest

Child-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Externalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 7 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more externalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline child-reported BPM Externalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest
Mean Parent-Reported Externalizing Problems Score on the BPM at 3-Month Follow-Up
Zeitfenster: approximately 3 months after posttest

Parent-reported Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) Externalizing Problems scale. The score is the mean of 7 items rated from 0 (not true) to 2 (very true). Higher scores indicate more externalizing problems (worse outcome). The outcome table reports observed scores; the attached factorial analyses adjust for the baseline parent-reported BPM Externalizing Problems score and prespecified covariates.

approximately 3 months after posttest

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Karey L O'Hara, PhD, Arizona State University

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

18. Februar 2023

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

30. März 2026

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

30. März 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

17. Februar 2023

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

8. April 2023

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

21. April 2023

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

30. September 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

4. September 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. September 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Study results will be shared through presentations at conferences and submissions in peer-reviewed journals. In addition, after taking all steps necessary to minimize possible re-identification of confidential data, I will make data, codebooks, and analysis scripts available to appropriate parties to verify findings and conclusions.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

one year post data collection

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

qualified researchers who have gained IRB approval and pre-registered their analyses

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren