이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

RESILIENCE-BUILDING INTERVENTION for EMERGENCY NURSES IN PALESTINIAN HOSPITALS (RBI-ENPH)

2026년 7월 15일 업데이트: Saqr Alkorom, Nablus University for Vocational and Technical Education

The Effect of a Resilience-Building Intervention on Psychological Well-Being and Advanced Life Support Performance Among Emergency Nurses in Palestinian Hospitals: A Quasi-Experimental Study

The goal of this quasi-experimental clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of a culturally adapted, six-week resilience-building programme on psychological well-being and clinical performance in emergency nurses working in Palestinian hospitals. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the six-week resilience-building programme improve the psychological well-being of emergency nurses? Does the intervention enhance their Advanced Life Support (ALS) performance during a simulation-based assessment? Researchers will compare the intervention group receiving the resilience-building programme to a non-equivalent control group to see if the intervention leads to significant improvements in adaptive coping, mental health, and simulated clinical performance.

Participants will:

Participate in a six-week resilience-building programme integrating cognitive-behavioural techniques, mindfulness, stress inoculation training, and mental rehearsal (intervention group only).

Complete validated questionnaires to measure psychological well-being and resilience before and after the study period.

Complete a standardized, high-fidelity simulated scenario to assess their Advanced Life Support (ALS) clinical performance.

연구 개요

상태

아직 모집하지 않음

상세 설명

Emergency nurses in Palestine operate under severe clinical and contextual stressors, including prolonged political conflict, acute resource shortages, and high patient acuity. Chronic exposure to these multifaceted stressors often leads to elevated psychological distress, which not only impacts the nurses' mental health but also has the potential to impair their clinical performance in high-stakes, life-saving situations. Addressing both psychological well-being and clinical competence is critical in this high-pressure environment.

Guided by Roy's Adaptation Model, this research addresses a critical gap in the literature by evaluating a dual-outcome intervention. The study hypothesizes that by enhancing adaptive coping mechanisms, nurses will not only improve their personal psychological resilience but also maintain or improve their objective clinical performance under stress.

To achieve this, the study utilizes a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control group pre-test/post-test design. To prevent treatment contamination between groups, allocation to either the intervention or control group is conducted at the hospital level.

The intervention consists of a culturally adapted, six-week resilience-building programme. It is specifically designed for the Palestinian context and integrates elements of cognitive-behavioural techniques, mindfulness, stress inoculation training, and mental rehearsal. The study will evaluate the programme's effectiveness by assessing changes in psychological well-being and objective clinical performance (specifically, Advanced Life Support [ALS] skills) before and after the study period. By utilizing high-fidelity simulated scenarios alongside validated psychometric tools, this study aims to provide robust, evidence-based recommendations for integrating psychological resilience training into clinical performance frameworks and nursing education.

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (추정된)

140

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 장소

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

  • 성인

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

예

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

Registered nurses currently employed in the Emergency Department of the selected Palestinian hospitals.

Nurses working full-time Willingness to commit to the 6-week intervention program and complete all simulation-based assessments.

Provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nurses who have participated in formal resilience or stress management training programs within the past year.

Nurses currently receiving medical or psychological treatment for diagnosed mental health conditions.

Nurses with physical or medical conditions that prohibit them from performing Advanced Life Support (ALS) chest compressions during the simulation assessment.

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 건강 서비스 연구
  • 할당: 무작위화되지 않음
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 하나의

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
실험적: Resilience-Building Programme
Participants in this arm will receive the culturally adapted, six-week resilience-building programme.
A six-week programme integrating cognitive-behavioural techniques, mindfulness, stress inoculation training, and mental rehearsal. The programme is specifically adapted for the Palestinian emergency nursing context to enhance adaptive coping mechanisms and psychological well-being.
간섭 없음: Standard Practice
Participants in this arm will not receive the resilience-building programme and will continue with their standard practice

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Psychological well-being and resilience score
기간: Baseline and Week 6
Psychological resilience is measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10). The scale consists of 10 items. The total score is calculated by summing all item scores. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 40. Higher scores indicate greater psychological resilience and better adaptive coping.
Baseline and Week 6
Advanced Life Support (ALS) Clinical Performance Percentage
기간: Baseline and Week 6
Clinical performance is assessed during a simulated Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia scenario using the CPR Performance Assessment Checklist Based on AHA Guidelines. The assessment evaluates 15 critical actions. The total score is calculated as a percentage, ranging from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate better clinical performance and adherence to standard protocols, with scores of 90% or above categorized as "Excellent
Baseline and Week 6

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Psychological Distress (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress) Scores
기간: Baseline and Week 6
Psychological distress is measured using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The scale evaluates three subscales: Depression (7 items), Anxiety (7 items), and Stress (7 items). The score for each subscale is calculated by summing the specific items and multiplying the sum by 2. Each of the three subscale scores ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 42. Higher scores indicate greater levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, reflecting poorer psychological well-being.
Baseline and Week 6

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작 (추정된)

2026년 7월 1일

기본 완료 (추정된)

2026년 10월 1일

연구 완료 (추정된)

2026년 10월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2026년 7월 9일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2026년 7월 9일

처음 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 14일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (실제)

2026년 7월 17일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2026년 7월 15일

마지막으로 확인됨

2026년 7월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • 2026421-16646

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD) 계획

개별 참가자 데이터(IPD)를 공유할 계획입니까?

아니요

약물 및 장치 정보, 연구 문서

미국 FDA 규제 의약품 연구

아니

미국 FDA 규제 기기 제품 연구

아니

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

구독하다