Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

RESILIENCE-BUILDING INTERVENTION for EMERGENCY NURSES IN PALESTINIAN HOSPITALS (RBI-ENPH)

15 de julio de 2026 actualizado por: Saqr Alkorom, Nablus University for Vocational and Technical Education

The Effect of a Resilience-Building Intervention on Psychological Well-Being and Advanced Life Support Performance Among Emergency Nurses in Palestinian Hospitals: A Quasi-Experimental Study

The goal of this quasi-experimental clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of a culturally adapted, six-week resilience-building programme on psychological well-being and clinical performance in emergency nurses working in Palestinian hospitals. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the six-week resilience-building programme improve the psychological well-being of emergency nurses? Does the intervention enhance their Advanced Life Support (ALS) performance during a simulation-based assessment? Researchers will compare the intervention group receiving the resilience-building programme to a non-equivalent control group to see if the intervention leads to significant improvements in adaptive coping, mental health, and simulated clinical performance.

Participants will:

Participate in a six-week resilience-building programme integrating cognitive-behavioural techniques, mindfulness, stress inoculation training, and mental rehearsal (intervention group only).

Complete validated questionnaires to measure psychological well-being and resilience before and after the study period.

Complete a standardized, high-fidelity simulated scenario to assess their Advanced Life Support (ALS) clinical performance.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Descripción detallada

Emergency nurses in Palestine operate under severe clinical and contextual stressors, including prolonged political conflict, acute resource shortages, and high patient acuity. Chronic exposure to these multifaceted stressors often leads to elevated psychological distress, which not only impacts the nurses' mental health but also has the potential to impair their clinical performance in high-stakes, life-saving situations. Addressing both psychological well-being and clinical competence is critical in this high-pressure environment.

Guided by Roy's Adaptation Model, this research addresses a critical gap in the literature by evaluating a dual-outcome intervention. The study hypothesizes that by enhancing adaptive coping mechanisms, nurses will not only improve their personal psychological resilience but also maintain or improve their objective clinical performance under stress.

To achieve this, the study utilizes a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control group pre-test/post-test design. To prevent treatment contamination between groups, allocation to either the intervention or control group is conducted at the hospital level.

The intervention consists of a culturally adapted, six-week resilience-building programme. It is specifically designed for the Palestinian context and integrates elements of cognitive-behavioural techniques, mindfulness, stress inoculation training, and mental rehearsal. The study will evaluate the programme's effectiveness by assessing changes in psychological well-being and objective clinical performance (specifically, Advanced Life Support [ALS] skills) before and after the study period. By utilizing high-fidelity simulated scenarios alongside validated psychometric tools, this study aims to provide robust, evidence-based recommendations for integrating psychological resilience training into clinical performance frameworks and nursing education.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Estimado)

140

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

Ubicaciones de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

Registered nurses currently employed in the Emergency Department of the selected Palestinian hospitals.

Nurses working full-time Willingness to commit to the 6-week intervention program and complete all simulation-based assessments.

Provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nurses who have participated in formal resilience or stress management training programs within the past year.

Nurses currently receiving medical or psychological treatment for diagnosed mental health conditions.

Nurses with physical or medical conditions that prohibit them from performing Advanced Life Support (ALS) chest compressions during the simulation assessment.

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: No aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Resilience-Building Programme
Participants in this arm will receive the culturally adapted, six-week resilience-building programme.
A six-week programme integrating cognitive-behavioural techniques, mindfulness, stress inoculation training, and mental rehearsal. The programme is specifically adapted for the Palestinian emergency nursing context to enhance adaptive coping mechanisms and psychological well-being.
Sin intervención: Standard Practice
Participants in this arm will not receive the resilience-building programme and will continue with their standard practice

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Psychological well-being and resilience score
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and Week 6
Psychological resilience is measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10). The scale consists of 10 items. The total score is calculated by summing all item scores. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 40. Higher scores indicate greater psychological resilience and better adaptive coping.
Baseline and Week 6
Advanced Life Support (ALS) Clinical Performance Percentage
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and Week 6
Clinical performance is assessed during a simulated Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia scenario using the CPR Performance Assessment Checklist Based on AHA Guidelines. The assessment evaluates 15 critical actions. The total score is calculated as a percentage, ranging from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate better clinical performance and adherence to standard protocols, with scores of 90% or above categorized as "Excellent
Baseline and Week 6

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Psychological Distress (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress) Scores
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and Week 6
Psychological distress is measured using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The scale evaluates three subscales: Depression (7 items), Anxiety (7 items), and Stress (7 items). The score for each subscale is calculated by summing the specific items and multiplying the sum by 2. Each of the three subscale scores ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 42. Higher scores indicate greater levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, reflecting poorer psychological well-being.
Baseline and Week 6

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Estimado)

1 de julio de 2026

Finalización primaria (Estimado)

1 de octubre de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Estimado)

1 de octubre de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

9 de julio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de julio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

14 de julio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

17 de julio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de julio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de julio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 2026421-16646

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir