Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

RESILIENCE-BUILDING INTERVENTION for EMERGENCY NURSES IN PALESTINIAN HOSPITALS (RBI-ENPH)

15 juillet 2026 mis à jour par: Saqr Alkorom, Nablus University for Vocational and Technical Education

The Effect of a Resilience-Building Intervention on Psychological Well-Being and Advanced Life Support Performance Among Emergency Nurses in Palestinian Hospitals: A Quasi-Experimental Study

The goal of this quasi-experimental clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of a culturally adapted, six-week resilience-building programme on psychological well-being and clinical performance in emergency nurses working in Palestinian hospitals. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the six-week resilience-building programme improve the psychological well-being of emergency nurses? Does the intervention enhance their Advanced Life Support (ALS) performance during a simulation-based assessment? Researchers will compare the intervention group receiving the resilience-building programme to a non-equivalent control group to see if the intervention leads to significant improvements in adaptive coping, mental health, and simulated clinical performance.

Participants will:

Participate in a six-week resilience-building programme integrating cognitive-behavioural techniques, mindfulness, stress inoculation training, and mental rehearsal (intervention group only).

Complete validated questionnaires to measure psychological well-being and resilience before and after the study period.

Complete a standardized, high-fidelity simulated scenario to assess their Advanced Life Support (ALS) clinical performance.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Pas encore de recrutement

Description détaillée

Emergency nurses in Palestine operate under severe clinical and contextual stressors, including prolonged political conflict, acute resource shortages, and high patient acuity. Chronic exposure to these multifaceted stressors often leads to elevated psychological distress, which not only impacts the nurses' mental health but also has the potential to impair their clinical performance in high-stakes, life-saving situations. Addressing both psychological well-being and clinical competence is critical in this high-pressure environment.

Guided by Roy's Adaptation Model, this research addresses a critical gap in the literature by evaluating a dual-outcome intervention. The study hypothesizes that by enhancing adaptive coping mechanisms, nurses will not only improve their personal psychological resilience but also maintain or improve their objective clinical performance under stress.

To achieve this, the study utilizes a quasi-experimental, non-equivalent control group pre-test/post-test design. To prevent treatment contamination between groups, allocation to either the intervention or control group is conducted at the hospital level.

The intervention consists of a culturally adapted, six-week resilience-building programme. It is specifically designed for the Palestinian context and integrates elements of cognitive-behavioural techniques, mindfulness, stress inoculation training, and mental rehearsal. The study will evaluate the programme's effectiveness by assessing changes in psychological well-being and objective clinical performance (specifically, Advanced Life Support [ALS] skills) before and after the study period. By utilizing high-fidelity simulated scenarios alongside validated psychometric tools, this study aims to provide robust, evidence-based recommendations for integrating psychological resilience training into clinical performance frameworks and nursing education.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Estimé)

140

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Coordonnées de l'étude

Lieux d'étude

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

Registered nurses currently employed in the Emergency Department of the selected Palestinian hospitals.

Nurses working full-time Willingness to commit to the 6-week intervention program and complete all simulation-based assessments.

Provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Nurses who have participated in formal resilience or stress management training programs within the past year.

Nurses currently receiving medical or psychological treatment for diagnosed mental health conditions.

Nurses with physical or medical conditions that prohibit them from performing Advanced Life Support (ALS) chest compressions during the simulation assessment.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Recherche sur les services de santé
  • Répartition: Non randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Resilience-Building Programme
Participants in this arm will receive the culturally adapted, six-week resilience-building programme.
A six-week programme integrating cognitive-behavioural techniques, mindfulness, stress inoculation training, and mental rehearsal. The programme is specifically adapted for the Palestinian emergency nursing context to enhance adaptive coping mechanisms and psychological well-being.
Aucune intervention: Standard Practice
Participants in this arm will not receive the resilience-building programme and will continue with their standard practice

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Psychological well-being and resilience score
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Psychological resilience is measured using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10). The scale consists of 10 items. The total score is calculated by summing all item scores. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 40. Higher scores indicate greater psychological resilience and better adaptive coping.
Baseline and Week 6
Advanced Life Support (ALS) Clinical Performance Percentage
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Clinical performance is assessed during a simulated Pulseless Ventricular Tachycardia scenario using the CPR Performance Assessment Checklist Based on AHA Guidelines. The assessment evaluates 15 critical actions. The total score is calculated as a percentage, ranging from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate better clinical performance and adherence to standard protocols, with scores of 90% or above categorized as "Excellent
Baseline and Week 6

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Psychological Distress (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress) Scores
Délai: Baseline and Week 6
Psychological distress is measured using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The scale evaluates three subscales: Depression (7 items), Anxiety (7 items), and Stress (7 items). The score for each subscale is calculated by summing the specific items and multiplying the sum by 2. Each of the three subscale scores ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 42. Higher scores indicate greater levels of depression, anxiety, and stress, reflecting poorer psychological well-being.
Baseline and Week 6

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Estimé)

1 juillet 2026

Achèvement primaire (Estimé)

1 octobre 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Estimé)

1 octobre 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

9 juillet 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

9 juillet 2026

Première publication (Réel)

14 juillet 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

17 juillet 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

15 juillet 2026

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 2026421-16646

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

NON

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner