- ICH GCP
- Register voor klinische proeven in de VS.
- Klinische proef NCT00927706
Experimental Control Investigation of the Impact of Assistive Technology on the User-caregiver Dyad: a Multi-site Trial (ATUTI)
Experimental Control Investigation of the Impact of an Assistive Technology Updating and Tune up Intervention on the User-caregiver Dyad: a Multi-site Trial
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of an assistive technology updating and tune up intervention on users and their caregivers. This intervention includes 4 components:
- an in-residence assessment of the mobility preferences of the older person and his/her caregiver
- a detailed review of forms of assistance, technological and human, that are currently being used
- recommendations by an occupational therapist for possible changes in the older person's mobility assistive technology or assistance strategy
- therapist negotiation of an mobility assistive technology updating and tune-up intervention plan with the individual and his or her caregiver. The intervention is provided to the immediate treatment following the administration of baseline measures and the delayed intervention group six weeks later, after an additional baseline measurement. The treatment is six weeks long and the follow-up is 26 weeks.
Hypothesis 1: For community-dwelling older people, an intervention that increases the appropriateness of existing or new assistive technology(AT) for mobility or self-care will alter established patterns of human assistance, such that caregiver burden is reduced or eliminated.
Hypothesis 2: At the same time, AT users will report less difficulty in mobility or self-care, as well as enhanced subjective well-being, and satisfaction with their modified personal assistance strategy.
Hypothesis 3: Following the AT intervention, caregivers will report reduced physical and/or psychological demands and increased satisfaction with their caregiving-related activities compared with
- the pre-intervention period
- caregivers in a delayed intervention control group. Hypothesis 4: Decreased physical and/or psychological demands on helpers will be associated with increases in device users' satisfaction with their personal assistance strategies.
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Conditie
Interventie / Behandeling
Studietype
Inschrijving (Werkelijk)
Fase
- Fase 2
Contacten en locaties
Studie Locaties
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancovuer, British Columbia, Canada, V6B 5K3
- Simon Fraser University
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre de santé et des services sociaux de Bordeaux-Cartierville--St-Laurent
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- the Centre de santé et des services sociaux Cavendish
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- the Centre de santé et des services sociaux de Laval
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Users: Aged 65 years and over
- Have moderate to severe disability that limits their ability to move from place to place independently and/or to perform self-care activities.
- Living at home
- Receiving 2 or more hour per week of assistance with mobility and/or self-care activities from a non-professional, caregiver who is also willing to take part in the study.
- Those caregivers will be adults aged 18 years and over.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Assistive technology users will be excluded if they have severe aphasia, are currently on a community occupational therapist caseload, or are unable to communicate in English or French.
Studie plan
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Behandeling
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
- Masker: Geen (open label)
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Experimenteel: Immediate intervention
Subjects and their caregivers randomized to this arm receive the intervention immediately after baseline data is collected.
|
This intervention includes 4 components: 1) an in-residence assessment of the mobility preferences of the older person and his/her caregiver; 2) a detailed review of forms of assistance, technological and human, that are currently being used; 3) recommendations by an occupational therapist for possible changes in the older person's mobility assistive technology or assistance strategy; and 4) therapist negotiation of an mobility assistive technology updating and tune-up intervention plan with the individual and his or her caregiver.
|
|
Experimenteel: Delayed Intervention
Subjects and their caregivers who are randomized to this group will receive the intervention after baseline measurements are administered twice (6 weeks apart).
|
This intervention includes 4 components: 1) an in-residence assessment of the mobility preferences of the older person and his/her caregiver; 2) a detailed review of forms of assistance, technological and human, that are currently being used; 3) recommendations by an occupational therapist for possible changes in the older person's mobility assistive technology or assistance strategy; and 4) therapist negotiation of an mobility assistive technology updating and tune-up intervention plan with the individual and his or her caregiver.
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|
|
Assessment of Life Habits
Tijdsspanne: baseline (1or 2 times), 6 weeks (immediately after intervention), 16 weeks later
|
baseline (1or 2 times), 6 weeks (immediately after intervention), 16 weeks later
|
|
Caregivers: Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcome Measure
Tijdsspanne: base line (1 or 2), 6 weeks (immediately after intervention), 16 weeks later
|
base line (1 or 2), 6 weeks (immediately after intervention), 16 weeks later
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|
|
Individually Prioritized Problem Assessment
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (1 or 2 times), Immediately after intervention, 16 weeks later
|
Baseline (1 or 2 times), Immediately after intervention, 16 weeks later
|
|
Functional Autonomy Measurement System
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (1 or 2 times), Immediately after intervention, 16 weeks later
|
Baseline (1 or 2 times), Immediately after intervention, 16 weeks later
|
|
Psychological Impact of Assistive Devices Scale
Tijdsspanne: Imediately after intervention. 16 weeks later
|
Imediately after intervention. 16 weeks later
|
|
Satisfaction with Personal Assistance Strategy
Tijdsspanne: Baseline (1 or 2 times), Immediately after intervention, 16 weeks later
|
Baseline (1 or 2 times), Immediately after intervention, 16 weeks later
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Onderzoekers
- Hoofdonderzoeker: Louise Demers, PhD, Université de Montréal
Studie record data
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start
Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)
Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Schatting)
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatst geverifieerd
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- CRIUM-8317
- NIDRR: H133A060062
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .