- ICH GCP
- Register voor klinische proeven in de VS.
- Klinische proef NCT07568990
Ureteral Access Sheaths in Endoscopic Kidney Stone Surgery
The Impact of Two Different Ureteral Access Sheaths on Success and Complications in Endoscopic Kidney Stone Surgery
This prospective, randomized, comparative study aims to evaluate the impact of aspirating and non-aspirating ureteral access sheaths on success rates and complications in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. A total of 70 patients with renal stones smaller than 2 cm will be enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups. One group will undergo RIRS using a non-aspirating ureteral access sheath, while the other group will be treated using an aspirating ureteral access sheath.
The primary outcome of the study is the stone-free rate, which will be assessed at postoperative follow-up. Secondary outcomes include operative time, fluoroscopy time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, infection-related parameters, and the need for ureteral stenting.
The study aims to determine whether the use of an aspirating access sheath improves surgical outcomes by reducing intrarenal pressure, enhancing visualization, and decreasing complication rates. The findings are expected to contribute to optimizing device selection and improving clinical outcomes in endoscopic kidney stone surgery.
Studie Overzicht
Toestand
Conditie
Interventie / Behandeling
Gedetailleerde beschrijving
This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of aspirating versus non-aspirating ureteral access sheaths in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.
Ureteral access sheaths are commonly used during RIRS to facilitate repeated access to the collecting system, maintain low intrarenal pressure, and improve visualization. While conventional non-aspirating sheaths allow passive outflow of irrigation fluid, aspirating sheaths provide active suction, which may enhance fragment evacuation, reduce intrarenal pressure, and potentially decrease infectious complications. However, comparative clinical data between these two approaches remain limited.
In this study, a total of 70 patients aged 18 to 75 years with renal stones smaller than 2 cm will be enrolled after providing informed consent. Patients will be randomized into two groups using a computer-generated block randomization method. The first group will undergo RIRS using a non-aspirating ureteral access sheath, while the second group will undergo RIRS using an aspirating ureteral access sheath. All procedures will be performed using a standardized surgical technique.
Demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, and perioperative variables will be recorded. Postoperative follow-up will include clinical and radiological evaluation. Stone-free status will be assessed during postoperative follow-up. Complications will be classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Additional parameters, including operative time, fluoroscopy time, length of hospital stay, infection-related laboratory findings, and the need for auxiliary procedures, will also be evaluated.
The aim of this study is to determine whether the use of an aspirating ureteral access sheath improves surgical efficiency and safety compared with a conventional sheath. The results are expected to provide evidence to guide clinical decision-making in endoscopic kidney stone surgery.
Studietype
Inschrijving (Geschat)
Fase
- Niet toepasbaar
Contacten en locaties
Studiecontact
- Naam: AHMET TAŞCI
- Telefoonnummer: +905531596690
- E-mail: ahmettasci400@gmail.com
Studie Locaties
-
-
Çorum
-
Çorum, Çorum, Turkije (Türkiye), 19040
- Werving
- Department of Urology, Hitit University Çorum Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum, Türkiye
-
Contact:
- AHMET TAŞCI
- Telefoonnummer: +90 553 159 6690
- E-mail: ahmettasci400@gmail.com
-
Hoofdonderzoeker:
- AHMET TAŞCI
-
Onderonderzoeker:
- MUSA EKİCİ
-
-
Deelname Criteria
Geschiktheidscriteria
Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie
- Volwassen
- Oudere volwassene
Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers
Beschrijving
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 18 and 75 years
- Patients diagnosed with kidney stones smaller than 2 cm
- Patients scheduled for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)
- Patients who provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with active urinary tract infection
- Patients with coagulopathy
- Pregnant patients
- Patients unable to tolerate the lithotomy position
- Patients with incomplete clinical or laboratory data
Studie plan
Hoe is de studie opgezet?
Ontwerpdetails
- Primair doel: Behandeling
- Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
- Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
- Masker: Geen (open label)
Wapens en interventies
Deelnemersgroep / Arm |
Interventie / Behandeling |
|---|---|
|
Experimenteel: Non-aspirating ureteral access sheath
Patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using a non-aspirating ureteral access sheath.
|
A conventional ureteral access sheath that allows passive outflow of irrigation fluid during RIRS.
|
|
Experimenteel: Aspirating ureteral access sheath
Patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using an aspirating ureteral access sheath.
|
A ureteral access sheath with an active suction system that facilitates removal of irrigation fluid and stone fragments during RIRS.
|
Wat meet het onderzoek?
Primaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Stone-free status
Tijdsspanne: At 3 weeks postoperatively
|
Stone-free status is defined as the absence of residual stones on low-dose non-contrast computed tomography or plain urinary system radiography at 3 weeks postoperatively.
|
At 3 weeks postoperatively
|
Secundaire uitkomstmaten
Uitkomstmaat |
Maatregel Beschrijving |
Tijdsspanne |
|---|---|---|
|
Operation time
Tijdsspanne: Measured during surgery, from incision to closure (intraoperative period)
|
Operative time is defined as the duration from the start of the operation to its completion.
|
Measured during surgery, from incision to closure (intraoperative period)
|
|
Length of hospital stay
Tijdsspanne: From postoperative admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
|
Length of hospital stay is defined as the time from postoperative hospital admission to hospital discharge, measured in days.
|
From postoperative admission to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
|
|
Intraoperative complications
Tijdsspanne: From start to completion of surgery (intraoperative period)
|
Intraoperative complications are defined as any adverse events occurring during the surgical procedure, including but not limited to bleeding, ureteral injury, or technical difficulties.
|
From start to completion of surgery (intraoperative period)
|
|
Postoperative infectious complications
Tijdsspanne: From end of surgery to 7 days postoperatively
|
Postoperative infectious complications are defined as infection-related adverse events occurring after surgery, including fever, urinary tract infection, and sepsis.
|
From end of surgery to 7 days postoperatively
|
Medewerkers en onderzoekers
Sponsor
Publicaties en nuttige links
Algemene publicaties
- Gauhar V, Traxer O, Castellani D, Sietz C, Chew BH, Fong KY, Hamri SB, Gokce MI, Gadzhiev N, Galosi AB, Yuen SKK, El Hajj A, Ko R, Zawadzki M, Sridharan V, Lakmichi MA, Corrales M, Malkhasyan V, Ragoori D, Soebhali B, Tan K, Chai CA, Tursunkulov AN, Tanidir Y, Persaud S, Elshazly M, Kamal W, Tefik T, Shrestha A, Tiong HC, Somani BK. Could Use of a Flexible and Navigable Suction Ureteral Access Sheath Be a Potential Game-changer in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery? Outcomes at 30 Days from a Large, Prospective, Multicenter, Real-world Study by the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Section. Eur Urol Focus. 2024 Dec;10(6):975-982. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.010. Epub 2024 May 24.
- Kwok JL, Somani B, Sarica K, Yuen SKK, Zawadzki M, Castellani D, Persaud S, Chai CA, Kamal W, Tefik T, Tursunkulov AN, Soebhali B, Hajj AE, Ko R, Fong KY, Dragos L, Tanidir Y, Angerri O, Traxer O, Gauhar V. Multicenter outcome analysis of different sheath sizes for Flexible and Navigable Suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) ureteroscopy: an EAU Endourology collaboration with the global FANS study group. Urolithiasis. 2024 Nov 15;52(1):162. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01662-4.
Studie record data
Bestudeer belangrijke data
Studie start (Werkelijk)
Primaire voltooiing (Geschat)
Studie voltooiing (Geschat)
Studieregistratiedata
Eerst ingediend
Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria
Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Updates van studierecords
Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)
Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria
Laatst geverifieerd
Meer informatie
Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie
Trefwoorden
Aanvullende relevante MeSH-voorwaarden
- Urogenitale ziekten
- Mannelijke urogenitale ziekten
- Berekeningen
- Pathologische aandoeningen, anatomisch
- Nier Ziekten
- Urologische ziekten
- Vrouwelijke urogenitale ziekten
- Vrouwelijke urogenitale ziekten en zwangerschapscomplicaties
- Urolithiase
- Urinewegen
- Nefrolithiase
- Pathologische aandoeningen, tekenen en symptomen
- Nierstenen
Andere studie-ID-nummers
- ETIK-2026-01
Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)
Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?
Beschrijving IPD-plan
Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel
Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct
Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .