Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Continuous Interscalene Block Results in Superior Recovery Throughout the First Postoperative Week

5. mai 2014 oppdatert av: St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Continuous Interscalene Block in Patients Having Outpatient Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Trial

The investigators undertook this prospective, randomized trial to compare the recovery profile throughout the first postoperative week in patients receiving continuous (CISB) interscalene brachial plexus block, single injection (SISB), or general anesthesia (GA) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Specifically, the effects of the three anesthetic techniques when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain, time-to-first pain, analgesic consumption, fast-tracked PACU bypass rate, length of PACU stay, time-to-discharge home, sleep duration, and related adverse effects. The investigators hypothesized that CISB results in a superior postoperative recovery profile as compared to SISB or GA alone.

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Detaljert beskrivelse

Background The advantages of single injection (SISB) and continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) over general anesthesia (GA) only have been previously reported. However, few studies extended their observations beyond 48 postoperative hours, and no study has compared the effects of SISB and CISB as sole anesthesia modalities with GA only. We undertook this randomized trial to compare the recovery profile of patients receiving SISB, CISB or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery through the first postoperative week. Our primary hypothesis was that highest NRS pain rating (worst pain score) at the end of the study week is lower for patients in the CISB group than for patients in the SISB or GA groups.

Methods After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consents were obtained, 71 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, ≥18 years of age, and BMI≤35 kg/m2, scheduled for elective outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, were enrolled. CISB patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine as bolus through the catheter whereas SISB patients received the same volume of injection through a needle. CISB patients received an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5mL/h with a patient controlled bolus of 5 mL hourly. GA only patients received a standardized general anesthetic. All patients were prescribed acetaminophen (500mg) with hydrocodone (7.5mg) every 4h as needed. CISB was discontinued 48 h after surgery. Postoperative highest pain scores (NRS) through the first postoperative week, time-to-first pain, analgesic consumption, fast-tracked postoperative care unit (PACU) bypass rate, length of PACU stay, time-to-discharge home, sleep duration, and related adverse effects were recorded in the PACU and at home on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7.

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

71

Fase

  • Tidlig fase 1

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

  • Forente stater
    • New York
      • New York, New York, Forente stater, 10025
        • St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år til 75 år (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III patients

≥ 18 years of age BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 Scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who were undertaken open shoulder procedures Patients with difficulty understanding the instructions for using the anesthetic infusion pump and/or pain scales Patients with contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., allergy to a local anesthetic (LA), local infection, coagulopathy) Patients with significant neurologic disorders of the upper extremity, psychiatric or cognitive disorders, history of substance abuse or chronic opioid use

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Støttende omsorg
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Aktiv komparator: Single ISB (SISB) group
Patients in this group received single injection (SISB) interscalene brachial plexus block
Fremgangsmåte: ISB

In SISB group; a 5 cm block needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the needle.

For CISB, a 5cm stimulating needle (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). A nonstimulating catheter was inserted approximately 3 cm beyond the tip of the needle. 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the catheter.

Andre navn:
  • SISB needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun)
  • CISB needle and catheter (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun)
Aktiv komparator: Continuous ISB (CISB) group
Patients in this group received continuous (CISB) interscalene brachial plexus block
Fremgangsmåte: ISB

In SISB group; a 5 cm block needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the needle.

For CISB, a 5cm stimulating needle (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). A nonstimulating catheter was inserted approximately 3 cm beyond the tip of the needle. 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the catheter.

Andre navn:
  • SISB needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun)
  • CISB needle and catheter (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun)
Ingen inngripen: General anesthesia (GA) group
Patients in this group received general anesthesia (GA)

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Patients With Pain: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11(0-10): 0:no Pain and 10:Severe/Worst Pain) ≥ 4
Tidsramme: throughout the first postoperative week on days 1, 2, 3, and 7
The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB), single interscalene brachial plexus block (SISB), or general anesthesia (GA)) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (highest NRS pain rating)
throughout the first postoperative week on days 1, 2, 3, and 7

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Time-to-first Pain
Tidsramme: throughout the first postoperative week
The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (SISB, CISB, and GA) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (time-to-first pain).
throughout the first postoperative week
The Number of Patients Consume ≥1 Dose of Analgesics
Tidsramme: throughout the first postoperative week
The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (SISB, CISB, and GA) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (analgesic consumption).
throughout the first postoperative week

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Fast-tracked Postoperative Care Unit (PACU) Bypass Patient Number
Tidsramme: throughout the first postoperative week (how many patients left PACU immediately just after the operation)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using fast-tracked PACU bypass rate
throughout the first postoperative week (how many patients left PACU immediately just after the operation)
Length of PACU Stay
Tidsramme: throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in PACU just after the operation)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using length of PACU stay.
throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in PACU just after the operation)
Time to Discharge Home
Tidsramme: throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in the hospital (includes PACU and hospital time)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using time-to-discharge home.
throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in the hospital (includes PACU and hospital time)
Total Hours of Sleep
Tidsramme: first postoperative week (on day 7)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using sleep duration.
first postoperative week (on day 7)

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Samarbeidspartnere

Baxter Healthcare Corporation

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Admir Hadzic, MD,PhD,Prof, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Generelle publikasjoner

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. august 2011

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. juni 2012

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. juni 2012

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

26. februar 2013

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

19. juni 2013

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

20. juni 2013

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)

4. juni 2014

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

5. mai 2014

Sist bekreftet

1. juli 2013

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Nøkkelord

Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • 10142 (DAIDS ES)

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere