Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Continuous Interscalene Block Results in Superior Recovery Throughout the First Postoperative Week

5 mai 2014 mis à jour par: St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Continuous Interscalene Block in Patients Having Outpatient Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Trial

The investigators undertook this prospective, randomized trial to compare the recovery profile throughout the first postoperative week in patients receiving continuous (CISB) interscalene brachial plexus block, single injection (SISB), or general anesthesia (GA) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Specifically, the effects of the three anesthetic techniques when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain, time-to-first pain, analgesic consumption, fast-tracked PACU bypass rate, length of PACU stay, time-to-discharge home, sleep duration, and related adverse effects. The investigators hypothesized that CISB results in a superior postoperative recovery profile as compared to SISB or GA alone.

Aperçu de l'étude

Statut

Complété

Intervention / Traitement

Description détaillée

Background The advantages of single injection (SISB) and continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) over general anesthesia (GA) only have been previously reported. However, few studies extended their observations beyond 48 postoperative hours, and no study has compared the effects of SISB and CISB as sole anesthesia modalities with GA only. We undertook this randomized trial to compare the recovery profile of patients receiving SISB, CISB or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery through the first postoperative week. Our primary hypothesis was that highest NRS pain rating (worst pain score) at the end of the study week is lower for patients in the CISB group than for patients in the SISB or GA groups.

Methods After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consents were obtained, 71 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, ≥18 years of age, and BMI≤35 kg/m2, scheduled for elective outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, were enrolled. CISB patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine as bolus through the catheter whereas SISB patients received the same volume of injection through a needle. CISB patients received an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5mL/h with a patient controlled bolus of 5 mL hourly. GA only patients received a standardized general anesthetic. All patients were prescribed acetaminophen (500mg) with hydrocodone (7.5mg) every 4h as needed. CISB was discontinued 48 h after surgery. Postoperative highest pain scores (NRS) through the first postoperative week, time-to-first pain, analgesic consumption, fast-tracked postoperative care unit (PACU) bypass rate, length of PACU stay, time-to-discharge home, sleep duration, and related adverse effects were recorded in the PACU and at home on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

71

Phase

  • Première phase 1

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • New York
      • New York, New York, États-Unis, 10025
        • St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 75 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Oui

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III patients

≥ 18 years of age BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 Scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who were undertaken open shoulder procedures Patients with difficulty understanding the instructions for using the anesthetic infusion pump and/or pain scales Patients with contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., allergy to a local anesthetic (LA), local infection, coagulopathy) Patients with significant neurologic disorders of the upper extremity, psychiatric or cognitive disorders, history of substance abuse or chronic opioid use

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Seul

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Single ISB (SISB) group
Patients in this group received single injection (SISB) interscalene brachial plexus block

In SISB group; a 5 cm block needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the needle.

For CISB, a 5cm stimulating needle (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). A nonstimulating catheter was inserted approximately 3 cm beyond the tip of the needle. 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the catheter.

Autres noms:
  • SISB needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun)
  • CISB needle and catheter (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun)
Comparateur actif: Continuous ISB (CISB) group
Patients in this group received continuous (CISB) interscalene brachial plexus block

In SISB group; a 5 cm block needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the needle.

For CISB, a 5cm stimulating needle (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). A nonstimulating catheter was inserted approximately 3 cm beyond the tip of the needle. 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the catheter.

Autres noms:
  • SISB needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun)
  • CISB needle and catheter (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun)
Aucune intervention: General anesthesia (GA) group
Patients in this group received general anesthesia (GA)

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Patients With Pain: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11(0-10): 0:no Pain and 10:Severe/Worst Pain) ≥ 4
Délai: throughout the first postoperative week on days 1, 2, 3, and 7
The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB), single interscalene brachial plexus block (SISB), or general anesthesia (GA)) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (highest NRS pain rating)
throughout the first postoperative week on days 1, 2, 3, and 7

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Time-to-first Pain
Délai: throughout the first postoperative week
The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (SISB, CISB, and GA) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (time-to-first pain).
throughout the first postoperative week
The Number of Patients Consume ≥1 Dose of Analgesics
Délai: throughout the first postoperative week
The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (SISB, CISB, and GA) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (analgesic consumption).
throughout the first postoperative week

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Fast-tracked Postoperative Care Unit (PACU) Bypass Patient Number
Délai: throughout the first postoperative week (how many patients left PACU immediately just after the operation)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using fast-tracked PACU bypass rate
throughout the first postoperative week (how many patients left PACU immediately just after the operation)
Length of PACU Stay
Délai: throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in PACU just after the operation)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using length of PACU stay.
throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in PACU just after the operation)
Time to Discharge Home
Délai: throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in the hospital (includes PACU and hospital time)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using time-to-discharge home.
throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in the hospital (includes PACU and hospital time)
Total Hours of Sleep
Délai: first postoperative week (on day 7)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using sleep duration.
first postoperative week (on day 7)

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Admir Hadzic, MD,PhD,Prof, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 août 2011

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 juin 2012

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 juin 2012

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

26 février 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

19 juin 2013

Première publication (Estimation)

20 juin 2013

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

4 juin 2014

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

5 mai 2014

Dernière vérification

1 juillet 2013

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

Essais cliniques sur Douleur postopératoire

Essais cliniques sur ISB

3
S'abonner