Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Continuous Interscalene Block Results in Superior Recovery Throughout the First Postoperative Week

5 de maio de 2014 atualizado por: St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Continuous Interscalene Block in Patients Having Outpatient Rotator Cuff Repair Surgery: a Prospective Randomized Trial

The investigators undertook this prospective, randomized trial to compare the recovery profile throughout the first postoperative week in patients receiving continuous (CISB) interscalene brachial plexus block, single injection (SISB), or general anesthesia (GA) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Specifically, the effects of the three anesthetic techniques when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain, time-to-first pain, analgesic consumption, fast-tracked PACU bypass rate, length of PACU stay, time-to-discharge home, sleep duration, and related adverse effects. The investigators hypothesized that CISB results in a superior postoperative recovery profile as compared to SISB or GA alone.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Concluído

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

Background The advantages of single injection (SISB) and continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB) over general anesthesia (GA) only have been previously reported. However, few studies extended their observations beyond 48 postoperative hours, and no study has compared the effects of SISB and CISB as sole anesthesia modalities with GA only. We undertook this randomized trial to compare the recovery profile of patients receiving SISB, CISB or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery through the first postoperative week. Our primary hypothesis was that highest NRS pain rating (worst pain score) at the end of the study week is lower for patients in the CISB group than for patients in the SISB or GA groups.

Methods After Institutional Review Board approval and informed consents were obtained, 71 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, ≥18 years of age, and BMI≤35 kg/m2, scheduled for elective outpatient arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, were enrolled. CISB patients received 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine as bolus through the catheter whereas SISB patients received the same volume of injection through a needle. CISB patients received an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5mL/h with a patient controlled bolus of 5 mL hourly. GA only patients received a standardized general anesthetic. All patients were prescribed acetaminophen (500mg) with hydrocodone (7.5mg) every 4h as needed. CISB was discontinued 48 h after surgery. Postoperative highest pain scores (NRS) through the first postoperative week, time-to-first pain, analgesic consumption, fast-tracked postoperative care unit (PACU) bypass rate, length of PACU stay, time-to-discharge home, sleep duration, and related adverse effects were recorded in the PACU and at home on postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

71

Estágio

  • Fase inicial 1

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • New York
      • New York, New York, Estados Unidos, 10025
        • St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos a 75 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III patients

≥ 18 years of age BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 Scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who were undertaken open shoulder procedures Patients with difficulty understanding the instructions for using the anesthetic infusion pump and/or pain scales Patients with contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., allergy to a local anesthetic (LA), local infection, coagulopathy) Patients with significant neurologic disorders of the upper extremity, psychiatric or cognitive disorders, history of substance abuse or chronic opioid use

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Cuidados de suporte
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Single ISB (SISB) group
Patients in this group received single injection (SISB) interscalene brachial plexus block

In SISB group; a 5 cm block needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the needle.

For CISB, a 5cm stimulating needle (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). A nonstimulating catheter was inserted approximately 3 cm beyond the tip of the needle. 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the catheter.

Outros nomes:
  • SISB needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun)
  • CISB needle and catheter (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun)
Comparador Ativo: Continuous ISB (CISB) group
Patients in this group received continuous (CISB) interscalene brachial plexus block

In SISB group; a 5 cm block needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the needle.

For CISB, a 5cm stimulating needle (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). A nonstimulating catheter was inserted approximately 3 cm beyond the tip of the needle. 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the catheter.

Outros nomes:
  • SISB needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun)
  • CISB needle and catheter (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun)
Sem intervenção: General anesthesia (GA) group
Patients in this group received general anesthesia (GA)

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Patients With Pain: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11(0-10): 0:no Pain and 10:Severe/Worst Pain) ≥ 4
Prazo: throughout the first postoperative week on days 1, 2, 3, and 7
The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB), single interscalene brachial plexus block (SISB), or general anesthesia (GA)) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (highest NRS pain rating)
throughout the first postoperative week on days 1, 2, 3, and 7

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Time-to-first Pain
Prazo: throughout the first postoperative week
The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (SISB, CISB, and GA) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (time-to-first pain).
throughout the first postoperative week
The Number of Patients Consume ≥1 Dose of Analgesics
Prazo: throughout the first postoperative week
The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (SISB, CISB, and GA) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (analgesic consumption).
throughout the first postoperative week

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Fast-tracked Postoperative Care Unit (PACU) Bypass Patient Number
Prazo: throughout the first postoperative week (how many patients left PACU immediately just after the operation)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using fast-tracked PACU bypass rate
throughout the first postoperative week (how many patients left PACU immediately just after the operation)
Length of PACU Stay
Prazo: throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in PACU just after the operation)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using length of PACU stay.
throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in PACU just after the operation)
Time to Discharge Home
Prazo: throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in the hospital (includes PACU and hospital time)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using time-to-discharge home.
throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in the hospital (includes PACU and hospital time)
Total Hours of Sleep
Prazo: first postoperative week (on day 7)
To compare the recovery profile of patients receiving CISB, SISB, or GA for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery throughout the first postoperative week by using sleep duration.
first postoperative week (on day 7)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Admir Hadzic, MD,PhD,Prof, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de agosto de 2011

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de junho de 2012

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de junho de 2012

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

26 de fevereiro de 2013

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

19 de junho de 2013

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

20 de junho de 2013

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)

4 de junho de 2014

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

5 de maio de 2014

Última verificação

1 de julho de 2013

Mais Informações

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever