Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Learning From Errors During Simulation-based Ultrasound Training

26. oktober 2015 oppdatert av: Martin G. Tolsgaard, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

During the past decades, simulation-based training has become essential for making trainees fit for clinical practice. Traditionally, trainees are instructed to practice with as few errors as possible during simulation-based training. However, recent evidence from the field of psychology suggests that transfer of learning may improve if trainees are encouraged to commit errors during training. The aim of this study is to assess on performances with real patients the effect of error-management instructions compared to error-avoidance instructions during simulation-based virtual reality ultrasound training.

This study is planned as a randomized controlled trial. Participants include medical students with no prior simulation practice at the fifth or sixth year of medical school. All participants receive 3 hours simulation-based ultrasound training focusing on fetal weight estimation. The participants (N=60) are randomized into two groups: Participants in group 1 are instructed to follow the simulator program step-by-step to achieve the highest possible simulator metric scores by making as few errors as possible. Participants in group 2 are instructed to experiment and explore and to deliberately make errors during training. A simulation-based pre- and post-test is administered before and after training.

Participants are scheduled to perform a transfer test seven to ten days after simulation training. The transfer test consists of fetal weight estimation on a real patient. The primary outcome is weight deviation of participant measurements compared to expert findings. Secondary outcomes include performance assessments of pre-, post- and transfer test performances by blinded ultrasound experts using the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale. Using an alpha level of 0.05, an effect size of 0.80, and a power of 0.80, 25 participants are needed in the two study groups. Loss to follow-up of up to 20% of study participants is anticipated, resulting in 30 participants in each study group.

Studieoversikt

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

60

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

      • Copenhagen, Danmark, 2100
        • Juliane Marie Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
      • Copenhagen O, Danmark, 2100
        • Dept. of Fetal Medicine, Juliane Marie Centre

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Kjønn som er kvalifisert for studier

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • are enrolled during the fifth or sixth year of medical school
  • provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have clinical or simulator ultrasound experience

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Error-avoidance training
Study group 1: Error-avoidance training (Focusing on achieving the highest possible metrics score by avoiding errors).

. Error-avoidance training: The participants are instructed to follow the simulator program step-by-step, to achieve the highest possible simulator metric scores by making as few errors as possible, and only to follow the task required in the training program.

Study group 2. Error-management training: The participants are required to complete the same training program as study group 1. The participants are instructed to experiment and explore on their own and to deliberately make errors during the task that they are instructed to perform. Participants are instructed to reflect on their errors based on the simulator metrics that they do not pass. Errors are framed as positive events and instructor comments may include statements such as "the more errors you make, the more you learn!" or "you have made an error? Great! Because now you can learn something new!"

Eksperimentell: Error-management training
Study group 2: Error-management training (Focusing on making errors and thinking of them in a positive way).

. Error-avoidance training: The participants are instructed to follow the simulator program step-by-step, to achieve the highest possible simulator metric scores by making as few errors as possible, and only to follow the task required in the training program.

Study group 2. Error-management training: The participants are required to complete the same training program as study group 1. The participants are instructed to experiment and explore on their own and to deliberately make errors during the task that they are instructed to perform. Participants are instructed to reflect on their errors based on the simulator metrics that they do not pass. Errors are framed as positive events and instructor comments may include statements such as "the more errors you make, the more you learn!" or "you have made an error? Great! Because now you can learn something new!"

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
diagnostic accuracy
Tidsramme: 7-10 days later in a tranfer test
The primary outcome is diagnostic accuracy during the transfer test performances. Diagnostic accuracy is determined as the percentage deviation from the fetal weight estimation performed by an experienced sonographer (i.e. an ultrasound expert).
7-10 days later in a tranfer test

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
performance scores based on the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale
Tidsramme: 7-10 days in a tranfer test
Secondary outcome measures include performance scores based on the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale.
7-10 days in a tranfer test

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2015

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

1. juni 2015

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

1. juni 2015

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

17. februar 2015

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

17. februar 2015

Først lagt ut (Anslag)

24. februar 2015

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Anslag)

27. oktober 2015

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

26. oktober 2015

Sist bekreftet

1. oktober 2015

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • H-4-2015-FSP

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere