Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Learning From Errors During Simulation-based Ultrasound Training

26. oktober 2015 opdateret af: Martin G. Tolsgaard, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

During the past decades, simulation-based training has become essential for making trainees fit for clinical practice. Traditionally, trainees are instructed to practice with as few errors as possible during simulation-based training. However, recent evidence from the field of psychology suggests that transfer of learning may improve if trainees are encouraged to commit errors during training. The aim of this study is to assess on performances with real patients the effect of error-management instructions compared to error-avoidance instructions during simulation-based virtual reality ultrasound training.

This study is planned as a randomized controlled trial. Participants include medical students with no prior simulation practice at the fifth or sixth year of medical school. All participants receive 3 hours simulation-based ultrasound training focusing on fetal weight estimation. The participants (N=60) are randomized into two groups: Participants in group 1 are instructed to follow the simulator program step-by-step to achieve the highest possible simulator metric scores by making as few errors as possible. Participants in group 2 are instructed to experiment and explore and to deliberately make errors during training. A simulation-based pre- and post-test is administered before and after training.

Participants are scheduled to perform a transfer test seven to ten days after simulation training. The transfer test consists of fetal weight estimation on a real patient. The primary outcome is weight deviation of participant measurements compared to expert findings. Secondary outcomes include performance assessments of pre-, post- and transfer test performances by blinded ultrasound experts using the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale. Using an alpha level of 0.05, an effect size of 0.80, and a power of 0.80, 25 participants are needed in the two study groups. Loss to follow-up of up to 20% of study participants is anticipated, resulting in 30 participants in each study group.

Studieoversigt

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

60

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

      • Copenhagen, Danmark, 2100
        • Juliane Marie Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
      • Copenhagen O, Danmark, 2100
        • Dept. of Fetal Medicine, Juliane Marie Centre

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ja

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • are enrolled during the fifth or sixth year of medical school
  • provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have clinical or simulator ultrasound experience

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Enkelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Error-avoidance training
Study group 1: Error-avoidance training (Focusing on achieving the highest possible metrics score by avoiding errors).

. Error-avoidance training: The participants are instructed to follow the simulator program step-by-step, to achieve the highest possible simulator metric scores by making as few errors as possible, and only to follow the task required in the training program.

Study group 2. Error-management training: The participants are required to complete the same training program as study group 1. The participants are instructed to experiment and explore on their own and to deliberately make errors during the task that they are instructed to perform. Participants are instructed to reflect on their errors based on the simulator metrics that they do not pass. Errors are framed as positive events and instructor comments may include statements such as "the more errors you make, the more you learn!" or "you have made an error? Great! Because now you can learn something new!"

Eksperimentel: Error-management training
Study group 2: Error-management training (Focusing on making errors and thinking of them in a positive way).

. Error-avoidance training: The participants are instructed to follow the simulator program step-by-step, to achieve the highest possible simulator metric scores by making as few errors as possible, and only to follow the task required in the training program.

Study group 2. Error-management training: The participants are required to complete the same training program as study group 1. The participants are instructed to experiment and explore on their own and to deliberately make errors during the task that they are instructed to perform. Participants are instructed to reflect on their errors based on the simulator metrics that they do not pass. Errors are framed as positive events and instructor comments may include statements such as "the more errors you make, the more you learn!" or "you have made an error? Great! Because now you can learn something new!"

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
diagnostic accuracy
Tidsramme: 7-10 days later in a tranfer test
The primary outcome is diagnostic accuracy during the transfer test performances. Diagnostic accuracy is determined as the percentage deviation from the fetal weight estimation performed by an experienced sonographer (i.e. an ultrasound expert).
7-10 days later in a tranfer test

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
performance scores based on the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale
Tidsramme: 7-10 days in a tranfer test
Secondary outcome measures include performance scores based on the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale.
7-10 days in a tranfer test

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2015

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. juni 2015

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. juni 2015

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

17. februar 2015

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

17. februar 2015

Først opslået (Skøn)

24. februar 2015

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)

27. oktober 2015

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

26. oktober 2015

Sidst verificeret

1. oktober 2015

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • H-4-2015-FSP

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

3
Abonner