Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Learning From Errors During Simulation-based Ultrasound Training

26 oktober 2015 bijgewerkt door: Martin G. Tolsgaard, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

During the past decades, simulation-based training has become essential for making trainees fit for clinical practice. Traditionally, trainees are instructed to practice with as few errors as possible during simulation-based training. However, recent evidence from the field of psychology suggests that transfer of learning may improve if trainees are encouraged to commit errors during training. The aim of this study is to assess on performances with real patients the effect of error-management instructions compared to error-avoidance instructions during simulation-based virtual reality ultrasound training.

This study is planned as a randomized controlled trial. Participants include medical students with no prior simulation practice at the fifth or sixth year of medical school. All participants receive 3 hours simulation-based ultrasound training focusing on fetal weight estimation. The participants (N=60) are randomized into two groups: Participants in group 1 are instructed to follow the simulator program step-by-step to achieve the highest possible simulator metric scores by making as few errors as possible. Participants in group 2 are instructed to experiment and explore and to deliberately make errors during training. A simulation-based pre- and post-test is administered before and after training.

Participants are scheduled to perform a transfer test seven to ten days after simulation training. The transfer test consists of fetal weight estimation on a real patient. The primary outcome is weight deviation of participant measurements compared to expert findings. Secondary outcomes include performance assessments of pre-, post- and transfer test performances by blinded ultrasound experts using the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale. Using an alpha level of 0.05, an effect size of 0.80, and a power of 0.80, 25 participants are needed in the two study groups. Loss to follow-up of up to 20% of study participants is anticipated, resulting in 30 participants in each study group.

Studie Overzicht

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

60

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

      • Copenhagen, Denemarken, 2100
        • Juliane Marie Center, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
      • Copenhagen O, Denemarken, 2100
        • Dept. of Fetal Medicine, Juliane Marie Centre

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

  • Kind
  • Volwassen
  • Oudere volwassene

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Ja

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • are enrolled during the fifth or sixth year of medical school
  • provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • have clinical or simulator ultrasound experience

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Enkel

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Experimenteel: Error-avoidance training
Study group 1: Error-avoidance training (Focusing on achieving the highest possible metrics score by avoiding errors).

. Error-avoidance training: The participants are instructed to follow the simulator program step-by-step, to achieve the highest possible simulator metric scores by making as few errors as possible, and only to follow the task required in the training program.

Study group 2. Error-management training: The participants are required to complete the same training program as study group 1. The participants are instructed to experiment and explore on their own and to deliberately make errors during the task that they are instructed to perform. Participants are instructed to reflect on their errors based on the simulator metrics that they do not pass. Errors are framed as positive events and instructor comments may include statements such as "the more errors you make, the more you learn!" or "you have made an error? Great! Because now you can learn something new!"

Experimenteel: Error-management training
Study group 2: Error-management training (Focusing on making errors and thinking of them in a positive way).

. Error-avoidance training: The participants are instructed to follow the simulator program step-by-step, to achieve the highest possible simulator metric scores by making as few errors as possible, and only to follow the task required in the training program.

Study group 2. Error-management training: The participants are required to complete the same training program as study group 1. The participants are instructed to experiment and explore on their own and to deliberately make errors during the task that they are instructed to perform. Participants are instructed to reflect on their errors based on the simulator metrics that they do not pass. Errors are framed as positive events and instructor comments may include statements such as "the more errors you make, the more you learn!" or "you have made an error? Great! Because now you can learn something new!"

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
diagnostic accuracy
Tijdsspanne: 7-10 days later in a tranfer test
The primary outcome is diagnostic accuracy during the transfer test performances. Diagnostic accuracy is determined as the percentage deviation from the fetal weight estimation performed by an experienced sonographer (i.e. an ultrasound expert).
7-10 days later in a tranfer test

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
performance scores based on the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale
Tijdsspanne: 7-10 days in a tranfer test
Secondary outcome measures include performance scores based on the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale.
7-10 days in a tranfer test

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start

1 februari 2015

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 juni 2015

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

1 juni 2015

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

17 februari 2015

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

17 februari 2015

Eerst geplaatst (Schatting)

24 februari 2015

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Schatting)

27 oktober 2015

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

26 oktober 2015

Laatst geverifieerd

1 oktober 2015

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • H-4-2015-FSP

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren