Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

En studie som evaluerer kombinasjonen av Encorafenib og Cetuximab versus Irinotecan/Cetuximab eller infusjonsbasert 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/Folinsyre (FA)/Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuximab hos kinesiske pasienter med BRAF V600E mutant kreftmetastaser. (NAUTICALCRC)

8. april 2026 oppdatert av: Pierre Fabre Medicament

En multisenter, randomisert, åpen, 2-arms, fase II-studie med en sikkerhetsinnledningsfase som evaluerer kombinasjonen av encorafenib og cetuximab versus irinotecan/cetuximab eller infusjonsbasert 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinsyre (FA) /Irinotecan (FOLFIRI)/Cetuximab hos kinesiske pasienter med BRAF V600E mutant metastatisk kolorektal kreft.

Encorafenib utvikles for tiden (med eller uten binimetinib), i kombinasjon med cetuximab, for behandling av voksne pasienter med B-RAF proto-onkogen, serin/treoninkinase V600E mutant (BRAF V600E) metastatisk kolorektal kreft (mCRC), som har mottatt systemisk behandling tidligere.

Studieoversikt

Status

Fullført

Forhold

Intervensjon / Behandling

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

107

Fase

  • Fase 2

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

  • Kina
    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Kina, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, Kina, 100036
        • Beijing Cancer Hospital
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, Kina, 350014
        • Fujian Medical University - Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital
      • Xiamen, Fujian, Kina, 361001
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University
    • Guangdong
      • Foshan, Guangdong, Kina, 528010
        • The First People's Hospital of Foshan
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, Kina, 510095
        • Cancer Center of Guangzhou Medical University
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, Kina, 510655
        • The Sixth Affiliated Hospital Sun Yat-sen University
      • Shantou, Guangdong, Kina, 515041
        • Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shantou University Medical College
      • Shenzhen, Guangdong, Kina, 518036
        • Peking University Shenzhen Hospital
    • Hebei
      • Baoding, Hebei, Kina, 071000
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, Kina, 150040
        • Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, Kina, 450052
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, Kina, 450008
        • Henan Cancer Hospital
    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, Kina, 430071
        • Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University
      • Wuhan, Hubei, Kina, 430022
        • Union Hospital Tongji Medical College Huazhong University Of Science And Technology
      • Wuhan, Hubei, Kina, 430030
        • Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, Kina, 410008
        • Xiangya Hospital Central South University
    • Jiangsu
      • Changzhou, Jiangsu, Kina, 213003
        • The First People's Hospital of Changzhou
    • Jiangxi
      • Ganzhou, Jiangxi, Kina, 341001
        • First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, Kina, 330006
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
      • Nanchang, Jiangxi, Kina, 330006
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
    • Jilin
      • Changchun, Jilin, Kina, 130021
        • The First Hospital of Jilin University
    • Liaoning
      • Jinzhou, Liaoning, Kina, 121011
        • The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, Kina, 110001
        • The First Hospital of China Medical University
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, Kina, 110042
        • Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, Kina, 710068
        • Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina, 200032
        • Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina, 200040
        • Huashan Hospital Fudan University
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina, 200092
        • Xinhua Hospital Affilliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, Kina, 200120
        • Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University
    • Sichuan
      • Neijiang, Sichuan, Kina, 641000
        • The Second People's Hospital of Neijiang
    • Tianjin Municipality
      • Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, Kina, 300060
        • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Kina, 310003
        • The First Affiliated Hospital - Zhejiang University School of Medicine
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Kina, 310016
        • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital - Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

18 år og eldre (Voksen, Eldre voksen)

Tar imot friske frivillige

Nei

Beskrivelse

Inklusjonskriterier for molekylær forhåndsscreening:

Følgende inklusjonskriterier må oppfylles for at en deltaker skal være kvalifisert til å gjennomgå forhåndsscreening av molekylær tumor:

  • Kinesisk mannlig eller kvinnelig deltaker med alder ≥18 år på tidspunktet for informert samtykke.
  • Histologisk eller cytologisk bekreftet kolorektal kreft (CRC) som er metastatisk.
  • Kvalifisert til å motta cetuximab i henhold til kinesisk godkjent etikett med hensyn til tumor Rottesarkom Viral Onkogen Homolog (RAS) mutasjonsstatus (dvs. godkjent for rottesarkom viral onkogen homolog villtype (RAS wt) status).
  • Kan gi en tilstrekkelig mengde representative tumorprøver for sentral prospektiv laboratorietesting av B-RAF proto-onkogen, serin/treoninkinase (BRAF) mutasjonsstatus og også retrospektiv RAS wt-status og mikrosatellitt-ustabilitet (MSI) testing.

Inklusjonskriterier for behandlingsperiode:

Følgende inklusjonskriterier må oppfylles for at en deltaker skal være kvalifisert for denne studien:

  • Kinesisk mannlig eller kvinnelig deltaker med alder ≥18 år på tidspunktet for informert samtykke.
  • Histologisk eller cytologisk bekreftet CRC som er metastatisk og ikke-opererbar på tidspunktet for studiestart (dvs. ikke egnet for fullstendig kirurgisk reseksjon ved screening).
  • Tilstedeværelse av en BRAF V600E-mutasjon i tumorvev tidligere bestemt ved en lokal analyse til enhver tid før screening eller av sentrallaboratoriet.

MERK: Andre protokolldefinerte inklusjonskriterier kan gjelde

Ekskluderingskriterier for molekylær forhåndsscreening:

Deltakere som oppfyller noen av følgende kriterier er ikke kvalifisert til å gjennomgå molekylær tumor forhåndsscreening:

  • Tidligere anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (anti-EGFR) behandling
  • Mer enn to tidligere regimer i metastatisk setting.
  • Kjent kontraindikasjon for å få cetuximab eller irinotekan i den planlagte dosen i henhold til den nyeste lokale etiketten for cetuximab og irinotekan.
  • Kjent historie med Gilberts syndrom eller er kjent for å ha noen av følgende genotyper: uridin 5'-difosfo-glukuronosyltransferase (UGT)1A1*6/*6, UGT1A1*28/*28 eller UGT1A1*6/*28.
  • Leptomeningeal sykdom.

Ekskluderingskriterier for behandlingsperiode:

  • Tidligere behandling med proto onkogen serin/treonin-protein kinase (RAF) hemmere, cetuximab, panitumumab eller andre EGFR-hemmere.
  • Symptomatisk hjernemetastase.
  • Leptomeningeal sykdom.
  • Bruk av urtemedisiner/kosttilskudd eller medisiner eller matvarer som er moderate eller sterke hemmere eller indusere av cytokrom P450 (CYP)3A4/5 ≤1 uke før start av studieintervensjon.
  • Kjent historie med akutt eller kronisk pankreatitt innen 6 måneder før start av studieintervensjon.

MERK: Andre protokolldefinerte eksklusjonskriterier kan gjelde

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Ingen (Open Label)

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Encorafenib og cetuximab

Safety Lead-in (SLI) fase:

28 dagers sykluser med encorafenib én gang daglig (QD) 300 mg (4 x 75 mg oral kapsel) og cetuximab 400 mg/m² startdose (120-minutters infusjon), deretter 250 mg/m² (60-minutters infusjon) deretter en gang ukentlig

Randomisert (fase II) fase:

28 dagers sykluser med encorafenib én gang daglig (QD) 300 mg (4 x 75 mg oral kapsel) og cetuximab 400 mg/m² startdose (120-minutters infusjon), deretter 250 mg/m² (60-minutters infusjon) deretter en gang ukentlig
Legemiddel: Encorafenib
oral hard kapsel
Andre navn:
  • LGX818
  • Braftovi®
  • PF-07263896
  • W0090
  • ONO-7702
Legemiddel: Cetuximab
intravenøs infusjon
Andre navn:
  • C225
  • Erbitux®
Eksperimentell: Irinotecan og cetuximab eller FOLFIRI og cetuximab

Randomisert (fase II) fase: Enten irinotekan og cetuximab eller FOLFIRI og cetuximab i 28 dagers sykluser.

Irinotekan og cetuximab:

  • irinotekan 180 mg/m² (90-minutters intravenøs infusjon eller for å studere standarder på stedet) annenhver uke og
  • cetuximab 400 mg/m² startdose (120-minutters intravenøs infusjon), deretter 250 mg/m² (60-minutters infusjon) deretter en gang ukentlig

ELLER

FOLFIRI og cetuximab:

  • irinotekan 180 mg/m² (90-minutters intravenøs infusjon eller for å studere standarder på stedet) annenhver uke
  • Folinsyre 400 mg/m² (120-minutters infusjon eller for å studere standarder på stedet) eller maksimal dose tolerert i et tidligere regime annenhver uke
  • 5-FU 400 mg/m² startdosebolus (ikke over 15 minutter), deretter 1200 mg/m²/dag × 2 dager (totalt 2400 mg/m² over 46 til 48 timer) kontinuerlig infusjon eller maksimal dose tolerert i et tidligere regime hver 2. uke og
  • cetuximab 400 mg/m² startdose (120-minutters intravenøs infusjon), deretter 250 mg/m² (60-minutters infusjon) deretter en gang ukentlig
Legemiddel: Encorafenib
oral hard kapsel
Andre navn:
  • LGX818
  • Braftovi®
  • PF-07263896
  • W0090
  • ONO-7702
Legemiddel: Cetuximab
intravenøs infusjon
Andre navn:
  • C225
  • Erbitux®
Legemiddel: FOLFIRI

Kombinasjon av:

irinotekan (også kjent som: Camptosar, Camptothecin-11 og CPT-11) intravenøs infusjon, folinsyre (også kjent som: 5-formyltetrahydrofolsyre og leukovorin) intravenøs infusjon, og 5-FU (også kjent som; fluorouracil) intravenøs bolus /intravenøs infusjon

Andre navn:
  • Folinsyre + Fluorouracil + Irinotekan

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Safety Lead-in Phase (SLI): Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Tidsramme: Cycle 1 (up to 28 days)
DLT rate was estimated based on data from DLT-evaluable participants during the DLT-evaluation period (which is the first 28 days after the first dose of study intervention in the SLI) to assess the safety and tolerability of the doublet arm.
Cycle 1 (up to 28 days)
Randomized Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Blinded (to Treatment Received) Independent Central Review (BICR) at the Primary Completion Date
Tidsramme: From first dose to the earliest documented progression or death due to any cause, with a minimal participant's follow-up of 36 weeks and a maximum treatment exposure of 68 weeks
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest documented disease progression (PD) as determined by BICR assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, or death due to any cause.
From first dose to the earliest documented progression or death due to any cause, with a minimal participant's follow-up of 36 weeks and a maximum treatment exposure of 68 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Blinded (to Treatment Received) Independent Central Review (BICR) at the Final Analysis
Tidsramme: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause, with a minimal participant's follow-up of 19 months and a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest documented disease progression as determined by BICR assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, or death due to any cause.
From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause, with a minimal participant's follow-up of 19 months and a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Safety Lead-in Phase: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (cORR) Per BICR
Tidsramme: Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
cORR as determined by Blinded (to treatment received) Independent Central Review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1, was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), where CR: disappearance of all target and and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm, and PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (cORR) Per Investigator
Tidsramme: Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
cORR as determined by investigator assessment per RECIST version 1.1, was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), where CR: disappearance of all target and and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm, and PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Duration of Response (DOR) Per BICR
Tidsramme: From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
DOR was defined for confirmed responders (CR or PR) only, as the time from the date of the first documented response to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) as determined by BICR per RECIST Version 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Duration of Response (DOR) Per Investigator
Tidsramme: From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
DOR was defined for confirmed responders (CR or PR) only, as the time from the date of the first documented response to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) as determined by investigator assessment per RECIST Version 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Overall Duration of Exposure to Study Treatment
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Exposure to the study intervention was defined as the time interval between the actual date of first study intervention administration (included) and the actual date of last study intervention administration (included), i.e., as the quantity "date of last study intervention administration date of first study intervention administration + 1 day". Duration of exposure by treatment arm was computed as the maximum of all durations of exposure for each drug of the assigned regimen.
Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
A TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants reporting TEAEs were reported in this outcome measure.
Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Number of Participants With Serious TEAEs
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
A serious TEAE is a TEAE that results in significant health consequences, such as death, hospitalization, or permanent disability. Number of participants reporting serious TEAEs were reported in this outcome measure.
Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Incidence of Dose Interruptions, Dose Modifications and Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events (AEs)
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation, with a maximum treatment exposure of 68 weeks
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. Number of participants with dose interruptions, dose modifications and dose discontinuations due to AEs were reported in this outcome measure.
Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation, with a maximum treatment exposure of 68 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Sign Abnormalities
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Clinically notable changes were defined as participants meeting the elevated or low values criterion compared to baseline. The criterion for clinically notable elevated values included: systolic blood pressure (BP): ≥ 160 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and an increase ≥ 20 mmHg from baseline; diastolic BP: ≥ 100 mmHg and an increase ≥ 15 mmHg from baseline; heart rate : ≥ 120 beats/min (bpm) with increase from baseline of ≥ 15 bpm; weight (kg) increase from baseline of ≥ 10 percent; body temperature [degree Celsius (deg C)] ≥ 37.5 deg C. The criterion for clinically notable low values included: systolic BP: ≤ 90 mmHg with decrease from baseline of ≥ 20 mmHg; diastolic BP: ≤ 50 mmHg with decrease from baseline of ≥ 15 mmHg; heart rate: ≤ 50 bpm with decrease from baseline of ≥ 15 bpm; weight: ≥ 20 percent decrease from baseline; body temperature [deg C]: ≤ 36 °C.
Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Clinically notable ECG changes were defined as participants meeting the criterion for QT interval, QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF), and heart rate compared to baseline. The criterion for QT interval and QTcF included: increase from baseline > 30 msec (ms); increase from baseline > 60 ms, new > 450 ms, new > 480 ms, new > 500 ms. The criterion for heart rate included: increase from baseline > 25 percent to a value > 100 beats per minute (bpm), decrease from baseline > 25 percent and to a value < 50 bpm.
Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Hematology and Coagulation Laboratory Parameters
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Clinically notable shift was defined as a worsening from baseline by at least 2 Grades, or to Grade 3 or above based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. 'Low' laboratory parameter thresholds are defined as values falling below the institutional Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) that meet the criteria for a Grade 1 or a higher decrease. 'High' laboratory parameter thresholds are defined as values exceeding the institutional Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) that meet the criteria for a Grade 1 or higher increase. Where, Grade 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death.
Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Clinically notable shift was defined as a worsening from baseline by at least 2 Grades, or to Grade 3 or above based on NCI-CTCAE version 4.03. 'Low' laboratory parameter thresholds are defined as values falling below the institutional Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) that meet the criteria for a Grade 1 or a higher decrease. 'High' laboratory parameter thresholds are defined as values exceeding the institutional Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) that meet the criteria for a Grade 1 or higher increase. Where, Grade 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death.
Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Number of Participants With Notable Dermatological Abnormalities
Tidsramme: From screening and every 8 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1 (i.e. on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7…), the end of treatment visit and the 30-day safety follow up visit, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Dermatological examination was performed to monitor for the possible development of keratoacanthoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma and primary melanoma, as these have been reported to occur with selective B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) inhibitor treatment. [1] The category "Other" includes all other dermatological findings identified during examination (e.g. rash acneiform, skin hyperpigmentation...).
From screening and every 8 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1 (i.e. on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7…), the end of treatment visit and the 30-day safety follow up visit, with a maximum treatment exposure of 111 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Measurement of Performance Status Using the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Scale
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 68 weeks
The performance status of participants was assessed using the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale. The scale was defined with the range from 0 to 5 with lower score mean a lower functional impairment, and a higher score (e.g. 5) corresponding to death.
Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 68 weeks
Safety Lead-in Phase: Evaluation of the Plasma Concentrations of Encorafenib
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day I) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of encorafenib.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day I) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Safety Lead-in Phase: Evaluation of the Serum Concentrations of Cetuximab
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of cetuximab.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Safety Lead-in Phase: Evaluation of the Area Under the Curve (AUC) Derived From Plasma Concentration of Encorafenib
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of encorafenib.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Safety Lead-in Phase: Evaluation of the Area Under the Curve (AUC) Derived From Serum Concentration of Cetuximab
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of cetuximab.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Safety Lead-in Phase: Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) Derived From Plasma Concentration of Encorafenib
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of encorafenib.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Safety Lead-in Phase: Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) Derived From Serum Concentration of Cetuximab
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of cetuximab.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Safety Lead-in Phase: Evaluation of the Minimum Concentration (Cmin) Derived From Plasma Concentration of Encorafenib
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of encorafenib.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Safety Lead-in Phase: Evaluation of the Minimum Concentration (Cmin) Derived From Serum Concentration of Cetuximab
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of cetuximab.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Randomized Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Investigator
Tidsramme: From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause, with a minimal participant's follow-up of 19 months and a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest documented date of PD as determined by investigator assessment per RECIST Version 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
From first dose to the earliest documented PD or death due to any cause, with a minimal participant's follow-up of 19 months and a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (cORR) in ENCO + CETUX Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Tidsramme: Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
cORR as determined by Blinded (to treatment received) Independent Central Review (BICR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1, was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), where CR: disappearance of all target and and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm, and PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Confirmed Objective Response Rate (cORR) in ENCO + CETUX Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Tidsramme: Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
cORR as determined by investigator assessment per RECIST Version 1.1, was defined as the proportion of participants with a best overall response of either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), where CR: disappearance of all target and and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm, and PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR) in ENCO + CETUX Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Tidsramme: From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease, with a minimal participant's follow-up of 19 months and a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
DOR was defined for confirmed responders (CR or PR) only, as the time from the date of the first documented response to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) as determined by BICR per RECIST Version 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease, with a minimal participant's follow-up of 19 months and a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR) in ENCO + CETUX Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Tidsramme: From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease, with a minimal participant's follow-up of 19 months and a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
DOR was defined for confirmed responders (CR or PR) only, as the time from the date of the first documented response to the earliest date of disease progression (PD) as determined by investigator assessment per RECIST Version 1.1, or death due to any cause. PD: at least a 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions were evaluated.
From time of response to the earliest documented PD or death due to underlying disease, with a minimal participant's follow-up of 19 months and a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Confirmed Disease Control Rate (cDCR) in ENCO + CETUX Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Tidsramme: Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
cDCR was defined as the proportion of participants with a confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) of CR, PR or Stable Disease (SD), as determined by BICR per RECIST Version 1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm, PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters, and SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Confirmed Disease Control Rate (cDCR) in ENCO + CETUX Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Tidsramme: Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
cDCR was defined as the proportion of participants with a confirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) of CR, PR or Stable Disease (SD), as determined by investigator assesment per RECIST Version 1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm, PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters, and SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Every 6 weeks (± 7 days) from first dose for the first 24 week, then every 12 weeks (± 7 days) until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Time to Response (TTR) in ENCO + CETUX Arm vs Control Arm Per BICR
Tidsramme: From day 1 until first documented response, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
TTR for confirmed responses was defined for responders (CR or PR) as the time between the date of randomization until the first documented response of CR or PR as determined by BICR per RECIST Version 1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm, and PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
From day 1 until first documented response, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Time to Response (TTR) in ENCO + CETUX Arm vs Control Arm Per Investigator
Tidsramme: From day 1 until first documented response, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
TTR for confirmed responses was defined for responders (CR or PR) as the time between the date of randomization until the first documented response of CR or PR as determined by investigator assessment per RECIST Version 1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and and non-target lesions; any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to <10 mm, and PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
From day 1 until first documented response, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)
Tidsramme: From randomization to death due to any cause, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
OS was defined as time from randomization until date of death due to any cause.
From randomization to death due to any cause, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Overall Duration of Exposure to Study Treatment
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Exposure to the study intervention was defined as the time interval between the actual date of first study intervention administration (included) and the actual date of last study intervention administration (included), i.e., as the quantity "date of last study intervention administration date of first study intervention administration + 1 day". Duration of exposure by treatment arm was computed as the maximum of all durations of exposure for each drug of the assigned regimen.
Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation
A TEAE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. Number of participants reporting TEAEs were reported in this outcome measure.
Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation
Randomized Phase 2: Number of Participants With Serious TEAEs
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation
A serious TEAE is a TEAE that results in significant health consequences, such as death, hospitalization, or permanent disability. Number of participants reporting serious TEAEs were reported in this outcome measure.
Day 1 until 30 days after study intervention discontinuation
Randomized Phase 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Vital Sign Abnormalities
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Clinically notable changes were defined as participants meeting the elevated or low values criterion compared to baseline. The criterion for clinically notable elevated values included: systolic blood pressure (BP): ≥ 160 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) and an increase ≥ 20 mmHg from baseline; diastolic BP: ≥ 100 mmHg and an increase ≥ 15 mmHg from baseline; heart rate : ≥ 120 beats/min (bpm) with increase from baseline of ≥ 15 bpm; weight (kg) increase from baseline of ≥ 10 percent; body temperature [degree Celsius (deg C)] ≥ 37.5 deg C. The criterion for clinically notable low values included: systolic BP: ≤ 90 mmHg with decrease from baseline of ≥ 20 mmHg; diastolic BP: ≤ 50 mmHg with decrease from baseline of ≥ 15 mmHg; heart rate: ≤ 50 bpm with decrease from baseline of ≥ 15 bpm; weight: ≥ 20 percent decrease from baseline; body temperature [deg C]: ≤ 36 °C.
Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Randomized Phase 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Clinically notable ECG changes were defined as participants meeting the criterion for QT interval, QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF), and heart rate compared to baseline. The criterion for QT interval and QTcF included: increase from baseline > 30 msec (ms); increase from baseline > 60 ms, new > 450 ms, new > 480 ms, new > 500 ms. The criterion for heart rate included: increase from baseline > 25 percent to a value > 100 beats per minute (bpm), decrease from baseline > 25 percent and to a value < 50 bpm.
Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Randomized Phase 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Hematology and Coagulation Laboratory Parameters
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Clinically notable shift was defined as a worsening from baseline by at least 2 grades, or to grade 3 or above based on NCI-CTCAE version 4.03. 'Low' laboratory parameter thresholds are defined as values falling below the institutional Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) that meet the criteria for a Grade 1 or a higher decrease. 'High' laboratory parameter thresholds are defined as values exceeding the institutional Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) that meet the criteria for a Grade 1 or higher increase. Where, Grade 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death.
Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Randomized Phase 2: Number of Participants With Clinically Notable Shifts in Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Clinically notable shift was defined as a worsening from baseline by at least 2 grades, or to grade 3 or above based on NCI-CTCAE version 4.03. 'Low' laboratory parameter thresholds are defined as values falling below the institutional Lower Limit of Normal (LLN) that meet the criteria for a Grade 1 or a higher decrease. 'High' laboratory parameter thresholds are defined as values exceeding the institutional Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) that meet the criteria for a Grade 1 or higher increase. Where, Grade 1: mild, asymptomatic or mild symptoms, clinical or diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2: moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; Grade 4: life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5: death.
Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment
Randomized Phase 2: Number of Participants With Notable Dermatological Abnormalities
Tidsramme: From screening and every 8 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1 (i.e. on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7…), the end of treatment visit and the 30-day safety follow up visit, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Dermatological examination was performed to monitor for the possible development of keratoacanthoma and/or squamous cell carcinoma and primary melanoma, as these have been reported to occur with selective B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) inhibitor treatment. [1] All other dermatological findings identified during examination (e.g. rash acneiform, skin hyperpigmentation...).
From screening and every 8 weeks from Cycle 1 Day 1 (i.e. on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 3, 5, 7…), the end of treatment visit and the 30-day safety follow up visit, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Measurement of Performance Status Using the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) Scale
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
The performance status of participants was assessed using the Eastern Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale. The scale was defined with the range from 0 to 5 with lower score mean a lower functional impairment, and a higher score (e.g. 5) corresponding to death. [1] Participants with no assessment of ECOG in the time frame.
Day 1 until 30 days after last dose of study treatment, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Time to Definitive Deterioration in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients (EORTC QLQ-C30) Questionnaire Scores
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer Patients (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire consisted of nine multi-item scales: five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social); three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting); and a global health and Quality of Life (QoL) scale. Each scale in the questionnaire was scored (0 to 100). High scores represented a high health/quality of life. Time to definitive deterioration (at least 10% worsening relative to Baseline with no later improvement) was assessed for both randomized phase treatment arms.
Day 1 until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Time to Definitive Deterioration in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Questionnaire
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
The European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) consisted of the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). The descriptive system consisted of five dimension (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression), each was rated according to a five-point verbal rating scale (VRS): 1. no problems, 2. slight problems, 3. moderate problems, 4. severe problems and 5. extreme problems) and translated into a five-digit number that described the participant's health state. Time to definitive deterioration (at least 10% worsening relative to Baseline with no later improvement) was assessed for both randomized phase treatment arms.
Day 1 until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Time to Definitive Deterioration in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) Questionnaire
Tidsramme: Day 1 until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) was a validated quality of life questionnaire for patient reported outcome assessment. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colon Cancer (FACT-C) consisted of 36 items, presented on a five-point Likert scale, in four domains of well-being (physical, emotional, social and functional) and the Colorectal Cancer Subscale. Higher score reflects a better quality of life. Time to definitive deterioration (at least 10% worsening relative to Baseline with no later improvement) was assessed for both randomized phase treatment arms.
Day 1 until 30 days safety follow-up, with a maximum treatment exposure of 116 weeks
Randomized Phase 2: Evolution in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Questionnaire
Tidsramme: Cycle 2 Day 1 until 30 days safety follow-up
The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire is a scale often used to anchor and characterize participant reported outcome (PRO) findings. This consisted of questions that asked participants to evaluate their colorectal cancer symptoms since starting study intervention according to a seven-point verbal rating scale: 1. very much improved, 2. much improved, 3. minimally improved, 4. no change, 5. minimally worse, 6. much worse, 7. very much worse. Completions of questionnaire are summarized per treatment group and study visits. Number of participants analyzed correspond to the actual number of participants who completed the questionnaire at the corresponding visit.
Cycle 2 Day 1 until 30 days safety follow-up
Randomized Phase 2: Evaluation of the Plasma Concentrations of Encorafenib
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of encorafenib.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Randomized Phase 2: Evaluation of the Serum Concentrations of Cetuximab
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of cetuximab.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Randomized Phase 2: Evaluation of the Area Under the Curve (AUC) Derived From Plasma Concentration of Encorafenib
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of encorafenib.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Randomized Phase 2: Evaluation of the Area Under the Curve (AUC) Derived From Serum Concentration of Cetuximab
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of cetuximab.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Randomized Phase 2: Evaluation of the Minimum Concentration (Cmin) Derived From Plasma Concentration of Encorafenib
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of encorafenib.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Randomized Phase 2: Evaluation of the Minimum Concentration (Cmin) Derived From Serum Concentration of Cetuximab
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of cetuximab.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Randomized Phase 2: Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) Derived From Plasma Concentration of Encorafenib
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of encorafenib.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Randomized Phase 2: Evaluation of the Maximum Concentration (Cmax) Derived From Serum Concentration of Cetuximab
Tidsramme: First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of cetuximab.
First day of treatment (Cycle 1 Day 1) and at steady state after 1 month treatment (Cycle 2 Day 1). Each cycle of 28 days.

Andre resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
Randomisert fase 2: Endringer fra baseline i karsinoembryonalt antigen i blod (CEA) og kreftantigen 19-9 (CA19-9) ved begynnelsen av hver syklus og ved slutten av behandlingen
Tidsramme: Screening (dag -28 til -1) til studiet er fullført, omtrent fra 12 til 29 måneder
Screening (dag -28 til -1) til studiet er fullført, omtrent fra 12 til 29 måneder
Randomisert fase 2: Mikrosatellitt-ustabilitet (MSI)-status i formalinfikserte og parafininnstøpte (FFPE)-prøver ved bruk av etablerte polymerasekjedereaksjonsanalyser (PCR) i tumorprøve versus kimlinjekontroll ved screening
Tidsramme: Screening (dag -28 til dag -1)
Screening (dag -28 til dag -1)

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Sponsor

Pierre Fabre Medicament

Samarbeidspartnere

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Shen Lin, MD, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

Publikasjoner og nyttige lenker

Den som er ansvarlig for å legge inn informasjon om studien leverer frivillig disse publikasjonene. Disse kan handle om alt relatert til studiet.

Generelle publikasjoner

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

14. september 2021

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

19. desember 2023

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

7. desember 2024

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

30. april 2021

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

5. august 2021

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

13. august 2021

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

30. april 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

8. april 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. februar 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Nøkkelord

Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre studie-ID-numre

  • W00090GE202

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

produkt produsert i og eksportert fra USA

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere