- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk utprøving NCT07607509
Lumbar Paravertebral Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of Lumbar Paravertebral Block and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of lumbar paravertebral block (L-PVB) and lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) in elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Effective postoperative pain management in this population is essential due to increased susceptibility to opioid-related adverse effects.
Participants aged 65 years and older will be randomly assigned to receive either bilateral L-PVB or bilateral L-ESPB in addition to standardized general anesthesia. The primary objective is to evaluate differences in postoperative opioid consumption within the first 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, intraoperative opioid use, time to mobilization, length of hospital stay, and incidence of opioid-related adverse events.
Studieoversikt
Status
Forhold
Intervensjon / Behandling
Detaljert beskrivelse
Lumbar spine surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain, particularly in elderly patients, who are at increased risk of opioid-related adverse effects such as respiratory depression, sedation, delirium, and delayed mobilization. Regional anesthesia techniques may improve postoperative analgesia and reduce opioid requirements in this population.
The lumbar paravertebral block (L-PVB) is a well-established technique providing segmental analgesia by targeting spinal nerves in the paravertebral space. The erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB), a newer interfascial plane block, has gained popularity due to its technical simplicity and favorable safety profile. However, comparative data on their effectiveness in lumbar spine surgery, especially in elderly patients, remain limited.
This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing L-PVB and L-ESPB in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either bilateral L-PVB or bilateral L-ESPB with a standardized dose of local anesthetic.
All patients will receive a standardized general anesthesia protocol and multimodal analgesia regimen. Postoperative pain management will follow a uniform protocol across both groups.
The primary endpoint is total opioid consumption within 48 hours after surgery, expressed as intravenous morphine equivalents. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores at predefined time points, time to first mobilization, length of hospital stay, use of rescue analgesia, and incidence of opioid-related adverse effects. Exploratory analyses will include assessment of inflammatory markers.
Studietype
Registrering (Antatt)
Fase
- Ikke aktuelt
Kontakter og plasseringer
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Tomasz Reysner, MD PhD
- Telefonnummer: +48 (61) 831-01-22
- E-post: treysner@ump.edu.pl
Studer Kontakt Backup
- Navn: Grzegorz Kowalski, MD PhD
- E-post: gkowalski@ump.edu.pl
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Poznan, Polen, 62-701
- Poznan University of Medical Sciences
-
-
Deltakelseskriterier
Kvalifikasjonskriterier
Alder som er kvalifisert for studier
- Eldre voksen
Tar imot friske frivillige
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- ge ≥65 years
- Scheduled for elective lumbar spine surgery
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- Ability to assess pain using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
- Provision of written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate
- Chronic opioid therapy
- Coagulation disorders
- Use of anticoagulant therapy contraindicating regional anesthesia
- Infection at the planned needle insertion site
- Allergy to ropivacaine or other study-related medications
- Severe hepatic failure
- Severe renal failure
- Cognitive impairment preventing reliable pain assessment
- Inability to cooperate with study procedures
- Extensive reoperation or surgery of unusually large extent that may interfere with outcome assessment
- Contraindications to general anesthesia or regional anesthesia
Studieplan
Hvordan er studiet utformet?
Designdetaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomisert
- Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
- Masking: Dobbelt
Våpen og intervensjoner
Deltakergruppe / Arm |
Intervensjon / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Ingen inngripen: General Anesthesia Alone (GA-only)
Participants will receive standardized general anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia according to institutional protocol.
No regional anesthesia technique will be performed.
|
|
|
Aktiv komparator: General Anesthesia + Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB)
Participants will receive standardized general anesthesia combined with bilateral lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) performed under ultrasound guidance.
Ropivacaine 0.2% will be administered at a volume of 20 mL per side (total 40 mL).
No adjuvants will be used.
All patients will receive standardized multimodal postoperative analgesia.
|
Ultrasound-guided bilateral interfascial plane block performed at the lumbar level for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Andre navn:
Ultrasound-guided bilateral paravertebral block at the lumbar level targeting spinal nerves for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Andre navn:
|
|
Aktiv komparator: General Anesthesia + Lumbar Paravertebral Block (L-PVB)
Participants will receive standardized general anesthesia combined with bilateral lumbar paravertebral block (L-PVB) performed under ultrasound guidance.
Ropivacaine 0.2% will be administered at a volume of 20 mL per side (total 40 mL).
No adjuvants will be used.
All patients will receive standardized multimodal postoperative analgesia.
|
Ultrasound-guided bilateral interfascial plane block performed at the lumbar level for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Andre navn:
Ultrasound-guided bilateral paravertebral block at the lumbar level targeting spinal nerves for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Andre navn:
|
Hva måler studien?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Total opioid consumption within 48 hours after surgery
Tidsramme: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Total cumulative opioid consumption within the first 48 hours after surgery, converted to intravenous morphine equivalents.
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Tiltaksbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to first rescue analgesia
Tidsramme: 48 hours after surgery
|
Time from completion of the surgery to the administration of the first dose of rescue opioid analgesic (in minutes).
|
48 hours after surgery
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Tidsramme: 0 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
0 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Tidsramme: 2 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
2 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Tidsramme: 6 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
6 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Tidsramme: 12 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
12 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Tidsramme: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Tidsramme: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Tidsramme: 0 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
0 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Tidsramme: 2 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
2 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Tidsramme: 6 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
6 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Tidsramme: 12 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
12 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Tidsramme: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Tidsramme: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
|
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
Tidsramme: 12 hours after surgery
|
serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
|
12 hours after surgery
|
|
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
Tidsramme: 24 hours after surgery
|
serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
Tidsramme: 48 hours after surgery
|
serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
|
48 hours after surgery
|
|
NLR
Tidsramme: 12 hours after surgery
|
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
|
12 hours after surgery
|
|
NLR
Tidsramme: 24 hours after surgery
|
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
NLR
Tidsramme: 48 hours after surgery
|
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
|
48 hours after surgery
|
|
PLR
Tidsramme: 12 hours after surgery
|
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)
|
12 hours after surgery
|
|
PLR
Tidsramme: 24 hours after surgery
|
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
PLR
Tidsramme: 48 hours after surgery
|
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)
|
48 hours after surgery
|
Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere
Etterforskere
- Studiestol: Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, MD PhD, Poznan University of Medical Sciences
- Studieleder: Małgorzata Reysner, Md PhD, Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Studierekorddatoer
Studer hoveddatoer
Studiestart (Antatt)
Primær fullføring (Antatt)
Studiet fullført (Antatt)
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først innsendt
Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Først lagt ut (Faktiske)
Oppdateringer av studieposter
Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)
Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene
Sist bekreftet
Mer informasjon
Begreper knyttet til denne studien
Ytterligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre studie-ID-numre
- 4/2026
Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)
Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?
IPD-planbeskrivelse
IPD-delingstidsramme
Tilgangskriterier for IPD-deling
IPD-deling Støtteinformasjonstype
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SEVJE
Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt
Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .