- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT07607509
Lumbar Paravertebral Block vs Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Analgesic Efficacy of Lumbar Paravertebral Block and Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery
This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of lumbar paravertebral block (L-PVB) and lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) in elderly patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery. Effective postoperative pain management in this population is essential due to increased susceptibility to opioid-related adverse effects.
Participants aged 65 years and older will be randomly assigned to receive either bilateral L-PVB or bilateral L-ESPB in addition to standardized general anesthesia. The primary objective is to evaluate differences in postoperative opioid consumption within the first 48 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, intraoperative opioid use, time to mobilization, length of hospital stay, and incidence of opioid-related adverse events.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Lumbar spine surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain, particularly in elderly patients, who are at increased risk of opioid-related adverse effects such as respiratory depression, sedation, delirium, and delayed mobilization. Regional anesthesia techniques may improve postoperative analgesia and reduce opioid requirements in this population.
The lumbar paravertebral block (L-PVB) is a well-established technique providing segmental analgesia by targeting spinal nerves in the paravertebral space. The erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB), a newer interfascial plane block, has gained popularity due to its technical simplicity and favorable safety profile. However, comparative data on their effectiveness in lumbar spine surgery, especially in elderly patients, remain limited.
This study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing L-PVB and L-ESPB in patients aged 65 years and older undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery under general anesthesia. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either bilateral L-PVB or bilateral L-ESPB with a standardized dose of local anesthetic.
All patients will receive a standardized general anesthesia protocol and multimodal analgesia regimen. Postoperative pain management will follow a uniform protocol across both groups.
The primary endpoint is total opioid consumption within 48 hours after surgery, expressed as intravenous morphine equivalents. Secondary endpoints include intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores at predefined time points, time to first mobilization, length of hospital stay, use of rescue analgesia, and incidence of opioid-related adverse effects. Exploratory analyses will include assessment of inflammatory markers.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Estimado)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Estudio Contacto
- Nombre: Tomasz Reysner, MD PhD
- Número de teléfono: +48 (61) 831-01-22
- Correo electrónico: treysner@ump.edu.pl
Copia de seguridad de contactos de estudio
- Nombre: Grzegorz Kowalski, MD PhD
- Correo electrónico: gkowalski@ump.edu.pl
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
-
Poznan, Polonia, 62-701
- Poznan University of Medical Sciences
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- ge ≥65 years
- Scheduled for elective lumbar spine surgery
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
- Ability to assess pain using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
- Provision of written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate
- Chronic opioid therapy
- Coagulation disorders
- Use of anticoagulant therapy contraindicating regional anesthesia
- Infection at the planned needle insertion site
- Allergy to ropivacaine or other study-related medications
- Severe hepatic failure
- Severe renal failure
- Cognitive impairment preventing reliable pain assessment
- Inability to cooperate with study procedures
- Extensive reoperation or surgery of unusually large extent that may interfere with outcome assessment
- Contraindications to general anesthesia or regional anesthesia
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Tratamiento
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Doble
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Sin intervención: General Anesthesia Alone (GA-only)
Participants will receive standardized general anesthesia and multimodal postoperative analgesia according to institutional protocol.
No regional anesthesia technique will be performed.
|
|
|
Comparador activo: General Anesthesia + Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (L-ESPB)
Participants will receive standardized general anesthesia combined with bilateral lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) performed under ultrasound guidance.
Ropivacaine 0.2% will be administered at a volume of 20 mL per side (total 40 mL).
No adjuvants will be used.
All patients will receive standardized multimodal postoperative analgesia.
|
Ultrasound-guided bilateral interfascial plane block performed at the lumbar level for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Otros nombres:
Ultrasound-guided bilateral paravertebral block at the lumbar level targeting spinal nerves for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Otros nombres:
|
|
Comparador activo: General Anesthesia + Lumbar Paravertebral Block (L-PVB)
Participants will receive standardized general anesthesia combined with bilateral lumbar paravertebral block (L-PVB) performed under ultrasound guidance.
Ropivacaine 0.2% will be administered at a volume of 20 mL per side (total 40 mL).
No adjuvants will be used.
All patients will receive standardized multimodal postoperative analgesia.
|
Ultrasound-guided bilateral interfascial plane block performed at the lumbar level for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Otros nombres:
Ultrasound-guided bilateral paravertebral block at the lumbar level targeting spinal nerves for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
Otros nombres:
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Total opioid consumption within 48 hours after surgery
Periodo de tiempo: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Total cumulative opioid consumption within the first 48 hours after surgery, converted to intravenous morphine equivalents.
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to first rescue analgesia
Periodo de tiempo: 48 hours after surgery
|
Time from completion of the surgery to the administration of the first dose of rescue opioid analgesic (in minutes).
|
48 hours after surgery
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 0 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
0 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 2 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
2 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 6 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
6 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 12 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
12 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at rest (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at rest assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 0 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
0 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 2 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
2 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 6 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
6 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 12 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
12 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative pain intensity at during movement (NRS)
Periodo de tiempo: 48 hours postoperatively
|
Pain intensity at during movementassessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain)
|
48 hours postoperatively
|
|
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
Periodo de tiempo: 12 hours after surgery
|
serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
|
12 hours after surgery
|
|
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after surgery
|
serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
Periodo de tiempo: 48 hours after surgery
|
serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) level
|
48 hours after surgery
|
|
NLR
Periodo de tiempo: 12 hours after surgery
|
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
|
12 hours after surgery
|
|
NLR
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after surgery
|
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
NLR
Periodo de tiempo: 48 hours after surgery
|
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR)
|
48 hours after surgery
|
|
PLR
Periodo de tiempo: 12 hours after surgery
|
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)
|
12 hours after surgery
|
|
PLR
Periodo de tiempo: 24 hours after surgery
|
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)
|
24 hours after surgery
|
|
PLR
Periodo de tiempo: 48 hours after surgery
|
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR)
|
48 hours after surgery
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Silla de estudio: Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, MD PhD, Poznan University of Medical Sciences
- Director de estudio: Małgorzata Reysner, Md PhD, Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Estimado)
Finalización primaria (Estimado)
Finalización del estudio (Estimado)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 4/2026
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Descripción del plan IPD
Marco de tiempo para compartir IPD
Criterios de acceso compartido de IPD
Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDIO
- SAVIA
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .