Denne siden ble automatisk oversatt og nøyaktigheten av oversettelsen er ikke garantert. Vennligst referer til engelsk versjon for en kildetekst.

Animated Video Versus Written Leaflet for Preoperative Kidney Transplant Education

13. juni 2026 oppdatert av: Muhammed Emin Polat, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Comparing the Effects of Animated Video and Written Information on Understanding, Knowledge Level, and Anxiety in Explaining Kidney Transplant Surgery to Patients

This randomized comparative trial evaluated whether an animated educational video, added to standard verbal counselling, differs from a content-matched written information leaflet, also added to standard verbal counselling, in improving procedural knowledge and reducing preoperative anxiety among adult kidney transplant candidates and prospective living donors. Participants were assessed immediately before and immediately after the assigned intervention. Secondary outcomes included participant satisfaction, preferred information modality, and the understandability and actionability of the educational materials.

Studieoversikt

Detaljert beskrivelse

Adult kidney transplant candidates undergoing preoperative evaluation and their prospective living donors were randomly allocated 1:1 to a video group or a written group. Both groups received standardized verbal counselling, unchanged across arms; the video group additionally viewed a ~2.5-minute animated video, and the written group additionally read a content-matched, illustrated A4 leaflet covering the same kidney transplant surgical pathway (laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, bench surgery, and recipient stages). Procedural knowledge was measured with a seven-item investigator-developed questionnaire and preoperative anxiety with the validated Turkish Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), administered immediately before and after the intervention. After the post-test, participants were cross-over exposed to the other format and indicated their preferred modality for future education. The understandability and actionability of both materials were independently rated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT-A/V and PEMAT-P).

Studietype

Intervensjonell

Registrering (Faktiske)

130

Fase

  • Ikke aktuelt

Kontakter og plasseringer

Denne delen inneholder kontaktinformasjon for de som utfører studien, og informasjon om hvor denne studien blir utført.

Studiesteder

Deltakelseskriterier

Forskere ser etter personer som passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kalt kvalifikasjonskriterier. Noen eksempler på disse kriteriene er en persons generelle helsetilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Kvalifikasjonskriterier

Alder som er kvalifisert for studier

  • Voksen
  • Eldre voksen

Tar imot friske frivillige

Ja

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 75 years
  • Kidney transplant candidate or prospective living donor undergoing preoperative evaluation
  • Able to read and write Turkish
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous exposure to the study's animated educational video
  • Cognitive impairment or inability to communicate adequately for assessment
  • Visual or hearing impairment preventing completion of questionnaires or viewing of the material
  • Documented severe psychiatric disorder

Studieplan

Denne delen gir detaljer om studieplanen, inkludert hvordan studien er utformet og hva studien måler.

Hvordan er studiet utformet?

Designdetaljer

  • Primært formål: Helsetjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: Randomisert
  • Intervensjonsmodell: Parallell tildeling
  • Masking: Enkelt

Våpen og intervensjoner

Deltakergruppe / Arm
Intervensjon / Behandling
Eksperimentell: Video group
Standard verbal counselling plus an animated educational video.
Approximately 2.5-minute animation depicting the kidney transplant surgical pathway
Aktiv komparator: Written group
Standard verbal counselling plus a content-matched written information leaflet.
Illustrated A4 leaflet with content identical to the video.

Hva måler studien?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in procedural knowledge
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Procedural knowledge was measured with a 7-item investigator-developed multiple-choice Kidney Transplant Surgical Process Knowledge Questionnaire, scored as the number of incorrect responses. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7. Higher scores indicate worse knowledge (more incorrect answers); a decrease from pre- to post-test indicates a better outcome.
Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Change in preoperative anxiety with the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) score
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Preoperative anxiety and information need were measured with the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), total score. Scores range from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater anxiety and information need); a decrease from pre- to post-test indicates a better outcome.
Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tiltaksbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Post-intervention knowledge score (between groups)
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Number of incorrect responses on the 7-item Kidney Transplant Surgical Process Knowledge Questionnaire after the intervention, compared between groups. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7. Higher scores indicate worse knowledge (a worse outcome).
Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Post-intervention Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) score (between groups)
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Total Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) score after the intervention, compared between groups. Scores range from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater anxiety and information need).
Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Participant satisfaction
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Participant satisfaction was measured with a 5-item investigator-developed Satisfaction and Perceived Benefit Questionnaire, each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale, summed to a total score. Scores range from a minimum of 5 to a maximum of 25. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (greater satisfaction and perceived benefit).
Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Preferred information modality
Tidsramme: Day 1 (immediately after interventions and cross-over exposure to both formats, same study visit)
Preferred information modality for future preoperative education, reported by participants after cross-over exposure to both formats immediately after the questionairre. This is a categorical outcome (video only / written only / both / no preference), not a scored scale; therefore minimum and maximum values are not applicable.
Day 1 (immediately after interventions and cross-over exposure to both formats, same study visit)
Understandability of the educational materials, assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) score
Tidsramme: Baseline (educational materials assessed prior to participant enrollment)
Understandability of the educational materials, assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): the PEMAT for Audiovisual materials (PEMAT-A/V) for the animated video and the PEMAT for Printable materials (PEMAT-P) for the written leaflet. The understandability score is expressed as a percentage, ranging from a minimum of 0% to a maximum of 100%. Higher percentages indicate a better outcome (greater understandability).
Baseline (educational materials assessed prior to participant enrollment)

Samarbeidspartnere og etterforskere

Det er her du vil finne personer og organisasjoner som er involvert i denne studien.

Etterforskere

  • Hovedetterforsker: Muhammed E Polat, Dr., Ankara Bilkent City Hospital ; Department of Urology ; Ankara ; Türkiye

Studierekorddatoer

Disse datoene sporer fremdriften for innsending av studieposter og sammendragsresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter og rapporterte resultater gjennomgås av National Library of Medicine (NLM) for å sikre at de oppfyller spesifikke kvalitetskontrollstandarder før de legges ut på det offentlige nettstedet.

Studer hoveddatoer

Studiestart (Faktiske)

2. januar 2026

Primær fullføring (Faktiske)

15. mai 2026

Studiet fullført (Faktiske)

17. mai 2026

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først innsendt

10. juni 2026

Først innsendt som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

13. juni 2026

Først lagt ut (Faktiske)

16. juni 2026

Oppdateringer av studieposter

Sist oppdatering lagt ut (Faktiske)

16. juni 2026

Siste oppdatering sendt inn som oppfylte QC-kriteriene

13. juni 2026

Sist bekreftet

1. juni 2026

Mer informasjon

Begreper knyttet til denne studien

Plan for individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)

Planlegger du å dele individuelle deltakerdata (IPD)?

NEI

IPD-planbeskrivelse

The de-identified participant data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Legemiddel- og utstyrsinformasjon, studiedokumenter

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert medikamentprodukt

Nei

Studerer et amerikansk FDA-regulert enhetsprodukt

Nei

Denne informasjonen ble hentet direkte fra nettstedet clinicaltrials.gov uten noen endringer. Hvis du har noen forespørsler om å endre, fjerne eller oppdatere studiedetaljene dine, vennligst kontakt register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en endring er implementert på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også bli oppdatert automatisk på nettstedet vårt. .

Abonnere