Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Animated Video Versus Written Leaflet for Preoperative Kidney Transplant Education

13 de junio de 2026 actualizado por: Muhammed Emin Polat, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Comparing the Effects of Animated Video and Written Information on Understanding, Knowledge Level, and Anxiety in Explaining Kidney Transplant Surgery to Patients

This randomized comparative trial evaluated whether an animated educational video, added to standard verbal counselling, differs from a content-matched written information leaflet, also added to standard verbal counselling, in improving procedural knowledge and reducing preoperative anxiety among adult kidney transplant candidates and prospective living donors. Participants were assessed immediately before and immediately after the assigned intervention. Secondary outcomes included participant satisfaction, preferred information modality, and the understandability and actionability of the educational materials.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Adult kidney transplant candidates undergoing preoperative evaluation and their prospective living donors were randomly allocated 1:1 to a video group or a written group. Both groups received standardized verbal counselling, unchanged across arms; the video group additionally viewed a ~2.5-minute animated video, and the written group additionally read a content-matched, illustrated A4 leaflet covering the same kidney transplant surgical pathway (laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy, bench surgery, and recipient stages). Procedural knowledge was measured with a seven-item investigator-developed questionnaire and preoperative anxiety with the validated Turkish Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), administered immediately before and after the intervention. After the post-test, participants were cross-over exposed to the other format and indicated their preferred modality for future education. The understandability and actionability of both materials were independently rated using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT-A/V and PEMAT-P).

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

130

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 to 75 years
  • Kidney transplant candidate or prospective living donor undergoing preoperative evaluation
  • Able to read and write Turkish
  • Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous exposure to the study's animated educational video
  • Cognitive impairment or inability to communicate adequately for assessment
  • Visual or hearing impairment preventing completion of questionnaires or viewing of the material
  • Documented severe psychiatric disorder

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Video group
Standard verbal counselling plus an animated educational video.
Approximately 2.5-minute animation depicting the kidney transplant surgical pathway
Comparador activo: Written group
Standard verbal counselling plus a content-matched written information leaflet.
Illustrated A4 leaflet with content identical to the video.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in procedural knowledge
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Procedural knowledge was measured with a 7-item investigator-developed multiple-choice Kidney Transplant Surgical Process Knowledge Questionnaire, scored as the number of incorrect responses. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7. Higher scores indicate worse knowledge (more incorrect answers); a decrease from pre- to post-test indicates a better outcome.
Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Change in preoperative anxiety with the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) score
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Preoperative anxiety and information need were measured with the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), total score. Scores range from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater anxiety and information need); a decrease from pre- to post-test indicates a better outcome.
Day 1 (immediately before and immediately after the intervention, same study visit)

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Post-intervention knowledge score (between groups)
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Number of incorrect responses on the 7-item Kidney Transplant Surgical Process Knowledge Questionnaire after the intervention, compared between groups. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 7. Higher scores indicate worse knowledge (a worse outcome).
Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Post-intervention Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) score (between groups)
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Total Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) score after the intervention, compared between groups. Scores range from a minimum of 6 to a maximum of 30. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater anxiety and information need).
Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Participant satisfaction
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Participant satisfaction was measured with a 5-item investigator-developed Satisfaction and Perceived Benefit Questionnaire, each item rated on a 5-point Likert scale, summed to a total score. Scores range from a minimum of 5 to a maximum of 25. Higher scores indicate a better outcome (greater satisfaction and perceived benefit).
Day 1 (immediately after the intervention, same study visit)
Preferred information modality
Periodo de tiempo: Day 1 (immediately after interventions and cross-over exposure to both formats, same study visit)
Preferred information modality for future preoperative education, reported by participants after cross-over exposure to both formats immediately after the questionairre. This is a categorical outcome (video only / written only / both / no preference), not a scored scale; therefore minimum and maximum values are not applicable.
Day 1 (immediately after interventions and cross-over exposure to both formats, same study visit)
Understandability of the educational materials, assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT) score
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline (educational materials assessed prior to participant enrollment)
Understandability of the educational materials, assessed with the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT): the PEMAT for Audiovisual materials (PEMAT-A/V) for the animated video and the PEMAT for Printable materials (PEMAT-P) for the written leaflet. The understandability score is expressed as a percentage, ranging from a minimum of 0% to a maximum of 100%. Higher percentages indicate a better outcome (greater understandability).
Baseline (educational materials assessed prior to participant enrollment)

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Muhammed E Polat, Dr., Ankara Bilkent City Hospital ; Department of Urology ; Ankara ; Türkiye

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

2 de enero de 2026

Finalización primaria (Actual)

15 de mayo de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

17 de mayo de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

10 de junio de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de junio de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

16 de junio de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

16 de junio de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de junio de 2026

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • TABED 2-25-1755

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Descripción del plan IPD

The de-identified participant data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir