Ta strona została przetłumaczona automatycznie i dokładność tłumaczenia nie jest gwarantowana. Proszę odnieść się do angielska wersja za tekst źródłowy.

Evaluating the Health Benefits of Workplace Policies and Practices - Phase II (WFHS)

13 grudnia 2017 zaktualizowane przez: Lisa Berkman, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
Although the prevalence of "family-friendly" policies in US workplaces has increased dramatically, few have been studied using scientifically sound designs. To address this, the NIH and CDC formed the Work, Family, and Health Network (WFHN). During Phase 1, the WFHN designed and conducted multiple pilot and feasibility studies. For Phase 2, the WFHN implemented an innovative intervention based on Phase I pilot studies that is designed to increase family-supportive supervisor behaviors and employee control over work, and to evaluate the intervention using a group randomized experimental design. Customized interventions were performed separately in workplaces of two separate corporate partners.

Przegląd badań

Status

Zakończony

Interwencja / Leczenie

Szczegółowy opis

Although the prevalence of "family-friendly" policies in US workplaces has increased dramatically in recent years, few have been studied using scientifically sound designs. To address this critical gap, the NIH and CDC formed the Work, Family, and Health Network (WFHN). During Phase 1, the WFHN designed and conducted multiple pilot and feasibility studies.

For Phase 2, the WFHN implemented an innovative intervention based on Phase 1 pilot studies that is designed to increase family-supportive supervisor behaviors and employee control over work, and to evaluate the intervention using a group randomized experimental design. The goal of the study is to assess the effects of a workplace intervention designed to reduce work-family conflict, and thereby improve the health and well being of employees. The study intervention is grounded in theory from multiple disciplines and supported by findings from pilot/feasibility studies. The study seeks to inform the implementation of evidence-based, family-friendly policies, and thereby improving the health and well-being of employees and their families nationwide.

The investigators assess the efficacy of the intervention via two independent, group-randomized field experiments, one at each of two employers representing different industries, referred to by alias as "LEEF" and "TOMO". LEEF is an extended care (nursing home) company and facilities were excluded if they were in very isolated settings, if there were fewer than 30 direct patient-care employees, or if facilities were recently acquired. TOMO is an Information Technology company. Within each industry partner, worksites of 50-120 employees each were randomly assigned to intervention or usual practice conditions. All employee and supervisor participants were assessed at baseline and at 6-, 12-, and 18-months post baseline, including survey interviews and health assessments.

Primary health outcomes were comprised of a cardiometabolic risk score using selected biomarkers and sleep duration and quality objectively measured using wrist actigraphy. These primary health outcomes were independently assessed as change from baseline to the 12-month wave, and separately in the two industries.

Typ studiów

Interwencyjne

Zapisy (Rzeczywisty)

2753

Faza

  • Nie dotyczy

Kontakty i lokalizacje

Ta sekcja zawiera dane kontaktowe osób prowadzących badanie oraz informacje o tym, gdzie badanie jest przeprowadzane.

Lokalizacje studiów

    • Massachusetts
      • Cambridge, Massachusetts, Stany Zjednoczone, 02318
        • Harvard School of Public Health

Kryteria uczestnictwa

Badacze szukają osób, które pasują do określonego opisu, zwanego kryteriami kwalifikacyjnymi. Niektóre przykłady tych kryteriów to ogólny stan zdrowia danej osoby lub wcześniejsze leczenie.

Kryteria kwalifikacji

Wiek uprawniający do nauki

  • Dziecko
  • Dorosły
  • Starszy dorosły

Akceptuje zdrowych ochotników

Nie

Płeć kwalifikująca się do nauki

Wszystko

Opis

Inclusion Criteria:

  • LEEF: employees and supervisors with at least 22 weekly hours of direct patient care work in selected facilities
  • TOMO: employees and supervisors located in the two data collection cities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • LEEF: nightwork schedule
  • TOMO: independent contractor classification

Plan studiów

Ta sekcja zawiera szczegółowe informacje na temat planu badania, w tym sposób zaprojektowania badania i jego pomiary.

Jak projektuje się badanie?

Szczegóły projektu

  • Główny cel: Inny
  • Przydział: Randomizowane
  • Model interwencyjny: Przydział równoległy
  • Maskowanie: Pojedynczy

Broń i interwencje

Grupa uczestników / Arm
Interwencja / Leczenie
Eksperymentalny: LEEF Industry only: Intervention
Customized to the "Leef" (alias) workplace: A 3-month structural and social change process designed to increase employee control over work time and family supportive supervisory behaviors.
The intervention was a 3-month structural and social change process designed to increase employee control over work time and family supportive supervisory behaviors (Kossek et al., in press). The change process was an integration of two previously evaluated interventions (Hammer et al., 2011; Kelly et al., 2011). A facilitator led 8 hrs of participatory sessions to transition employees from a time-based to a results-based work culture. Supervisors participated in all change activities plus 4hrs of training in supportive supervision. Training in family supportive supervision was implemented with behavioral computer-based training (cTRAIN, NWeta, Lake Oswego, OR) followed by 2 rounds of goal-setting and behavioral self-monitoring using an iPod Touch (Habitrack, OHSU, Portland, OR).
Brak interwencji: LEEF Industry only: Usual Practice
Continued work conditions and practice as "Usual Practice" in that workplace
Eksperymentalny: TOMO Industry only: Intervention
Customized to the "Tomo" (alias) workplace: A 3-month structural and social change process designed to increase employee control over work time and family supportive supervisory behaviors.
The intervention was a 3-month structural and social change process designed to increase employee control over work time and family supportive supervisory behaviors (Kossek et al., in press). The change process was an integration of two previously evaluated interventions (Hammer et al., 2011; Kelly et al., 2011). A facilitator led 8 hrs of participatory sessions to transition employees from a time-based to a results-based work culture. Supervisors participated in all change activities plus 4hrs of training in supportive supervision. Training in family supportive supervision was implemented with behavioral computer-based training (cTRAIN, NWeta, Lake Oswego, OR) followed by 2 rounds of goal-setting and behavioral self-monitoring using an iPod Touch (Habitrack, OHSU, Portland, OR).
Brak interwencji: TOMO Industry only: Usual Practice
Continued work conditions and practice as "Usual Practice" in that workplace

Co mierzy badanie?

Podstawowe miary wyniku

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
Change in total sleep time
Ramy czasowe: baseline to one year later
Average 24 hour total sleep time as assessed by ~1 week of actigraphy
baseline to one year later
change in wake after sleep onset
Ramy czasowe: baseline to one year later
Amount of nightime wake after sleep onset as assessed by ~1 week of actigraphy
baseline to one year later
change in cardiometabolic risk score
Ramy czasowe: baseline to one year later
The cardiometabolic risk score was created based on modifiable risk factors using an independently validated CVD risk score developed from the Framingham offspring study; including BMI, blood pressure, HbA1C, cholesterol, and tobacco consumption.
baseline to one year later

Miary wyników drugorzędnych

Miara wyniku
Opis środka
Ramy czasowe
change in sleep insufficiency
Ramy czasowe: baseline to one year later

Sleep insufficiency was assessed by the following question: How often during the past 4 weeks did you get enough sleep to feel rested upon waking up? Would you say never, rarely, sometimes, often, or very often?

YES - NEVER/RARELY

NO - SOMETIMES OFTEN VERY OFTEN

baseline to one year later
change in insomnia symptoms
Ramy czasowe: baseline to one year later

Insomnia symptoms were assessed by the following question: During the past 4 weeks, how often did you wake up in the middle of the night or early morning? (Would you say never, less than once a week, once or twice a week, or three or more times a week?)

YES - THREE OR MORE TIMES A WEEK

NO - NEVER/LESS THAN ONCE A WEEK/ONCE OR TWICE A WEEK

baseline to one year later

Współpracownicy i badacze

Tutaj znajdziesz osoby i organizacje zaangażowane w to badanie.

Śledczy

  • Główny śledczy: Lisa F Berkman, PhD, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
  • Główny śledczy: Orfeu M Buxton, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School; Harvard School of Public Health; Pennsylvania State University

Publikacje i pomocne linki

Osoba odpowiedzialna za wprowadzenie informacji o badaniu dobrowolnie udostępnia te publikacje. Mogą one dotyczyć wszystkiego, co jest związane z badaniem.

Publikacje ogólne

Daty zapisu na studia

Daty te śledzą postęp w przesyłaniu rekordów badań i podsumowań wyników do ClinicalTrials.gov. Zapisy badań i zgłoszone wyniki są przeglądane przez National Library of Medicine (NLM), aby upewnić się, że spełniają określone standardy kontroli jakości, zanim zostaną opublikowane na publicznej stronie internetowej.

Główne daty studiów

Rozpoczęcie studiów

1 września 2009

Zakończenie podstawowe (Rzeczywisty)

1 grudnia 2012

Ukończenie studiów (Rzeczywisty)

1 grudnia 2012

Daty rejestracji na studia

Pierwszy przesłany

28 stycznia 2014

Pierwszy przesłany, który spełnia kryteria kontroli jakości

29 stycznia 2014

Pierwszy wysłany (Oszacować)

30 stycznia 2014

Aktualizacje rekordów badań

Ostatnia wysłana aktualizacja (Rzeczywisty)

15 grudnia 2017

Ostatnia przesłana aktualizacja, która spełniała kryteria kontroli jakości

13 grudnia 2017

Ostatnia weryfikacja

1 grudnia 2017

Więcej informacji

Terminy związane z tym badaniem

Inne numery identyfikacyjne badania

  • P16633
  • U01AG027669 (Grant/umowa NIH USA)
  • U01HD051218 (Grant/umowa NIH USA)
  • U01HD051256 (Grant/umowa NIH USA)
  • U01HD051276 (Grant/umowa NIH USA)
  • U01HD051217 (Grant/umowa NIH USA)
  • R01HL107240 (Grant/umowa NIH USA)
  • U01OH008788 (Grant/umowa NIH USA)
  • U01HD059773 (Grant/umowa NIH USA)

Te informacje zostały pobrane bezpośrednio ze strony internetowej clinicaltrials.gov bez żadnych zmian. Jeśli chcesz zmienić, usunąć lub zaktualizować dane swojego badania, skontaktuj się z register@clinicaltrials.gov. Gdy tylko zmiana zostanie wprowadzona na stronie clinicaltrials.gov, zostanie ona automatycznie zaktualizowana również na naszej stronie internetowej .

Subskrybuj