Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Evaluating the Health Benefits of Workplace Policies and Practices - Phase II (WFHS)

13 de diciembre de 2017 actualizado por: Lisa Berkman, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
Although the prevalence of "family-friendly" policies in US workplaces has increased dramatically, few have been studied using scientifically sound designs. To address this, the NIH and CDC formed the Work, Family, and Health Network (WFHN). During Phase 1, the WFHN designed and conducted multiple pilot and feasibility studies. For Phase 2, the WFHN implemented an innovative intervention based on Phase I pilot studies that is designed to increase family-supportive supervisor behaviors and employee control over work, and to evaluate the intervention using a group randomized experimental design. Customized interventions were performed separately in workplaces of two separate corporate partners.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

Although the prevalence of "family-friendly" policies in US workplaces has increased dramatically in recent years, few have been studied using scientifically sound designs. To address this critical gap, the NIH and CDC formed the Work, Family, and Health Network (WFHN). During Phase 1, the WFHN designed and conducted multiple pilot and feasibility studies.

For Phase 2, the WFHN implemented an innovative intervention based on Phase 1 pilot studies that is designed to increase family-supportive supervisor behaviors and employee control over work, and to evaluate the intervention using a group randomized experimental design. The goal of the study is to assess the effects of a workplace intervention designed to reduce work-family conflict, and thereby improve the health and well being of employees. The study intervention is grounded in theory from multiple disciplines and supported by findings from pilot/feasibility studies. The study seeks to inform the implementation of evidence-based, family-friendly policies, and thereby improving the health and well-being of employees and their families nationwide.

The investigators assess the efficacy of the intervention via two independent, group-randomized field experiments, one at each of two employers representing different industries, referred to by alias as "LEEF" and "TOMO". LEEF is an extended care (nursing home) company and facilities were excluded if they were in very isolated settings, if there were fewer than 30 direct patient-care employees, or if facilities were recently acquired. TOMO is an Information Technology company. Within each industry partner, worksites of 50-120 employees each were randomly assigned to intervention or usual practice conditions. All employee and supervisor participants were assessed at baseline and at 6-, 12-, and 18-months post baseline, including survey interviews and health assessments.

Primary health outcomes were comprised of a cardiometabolic risk score using selected biomarkers and sleep duration and quality objectively measured using wrist actigraphy. These primary health outcomes were independently assessed as change from baseline to the 12-month wave, and separately in the two industries.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

2753

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Massachusetts
      • Cambridge, Massachusetts, Estados Unidos, 02318
        • Harvard School of Public Health

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Niño
  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • LEEF: employees and supervisors with at least 22 weekly hours of direct patient care work in selected facilities
  • TOMO: employees and supervisors located in the two data collection cities

Exclusion Criteria:

  • LEEF: nightwork schedule
  • TOMO: independent contractor classification

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Otro
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: LEEF Industry only: Intervention
Customized to the "Leef" (alias) workplace: A 3-month structural and social change process designed to increase employee control over work time and family supportive supervisory behaviors.
The intervention was a 3-month structural and social change process designed to increase employee control over work time and family supportive supervisory behaviors (Kossek et al., in press). The change process was an integration of two previously evaluated interventions (Hammer et al., 2011; Kelly et al., 2011). A facilitator led 8 hrs of participatory sessions to transition employees from a time-based to a results-based work culture. Supervisors participated in all change activities plus 4hrs of training in supportive supervision. Training in family supportive supervision was implemented with behavioral computer-based training (cTRAIN, NWeta, Lake Oswego, OR) followed by 2 rounds of goal-setting and behavioral self-monitoring using an iPod Touch (Habitrack, OHSU, Portland, OR).
Sin intervención: LEEF Industry only: Usual Practice
Continued work conditions and practice as "Usual Practice" in that workplace
Experimental: TOMO Industry only: Intervention
Customized to the "Tomo" (alias) workplace: A 3-month structural and social change process designed to increase employee control over work time and family supportive supervisory behaviors.
The intervention was a 3-month structural and social change process designed to increase employee control over work time and family supportive supervisory behaviors (Kossek et al., in press). The change process was an integration of two previously evaluated interventions (Hammer et al., 2011; Kelly et al., 2011). A facilitator led 8 hrs of participatory sessions to transition employees from a time-based to a results-based work culture. Supervisors participated in all change activities plus 4hrs of training in supportive supervision. Training in family supportive supervision was implemented with behavioral computer-based training (cTRAIN, NWeta, Lake Oswego, OR) followed by 2 rounds of goal-setting and behavioral self-monitoring using an iPod Touch (Habitrack, OHSU, Portland, OR).
Sin intervención: TOMO Industry only: Usual Practice
Continued work conditions and practice as "Usual Practice" in that workplace

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in total sleep time
Periodo de tiempo: baseline to one year later
Average 24 hour total sleep time as assessed by ~1 week of actigraphy
baseline to one year later
change in wake after sleep onset
Periodo de tiempo: baseline to one year later
Amount of nightime wake after sleep onset as assessed by ~1 week of actigraphy
baseline to one year later
change in cardiometabolic risk score
Periodo de tiempo: baseline to one year later
The cardiometabolic risk score was created based on modifiable risk factors using an independently validated CVD risk score developed from the Framingham offspring study; including BMI, blood pressure, HbA1C, cholesterol, and tobacco consumption.
baseline to one year later

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
change in sleep insufficiency
Periodo de tiempo: baseline to one year later

Sleep insufficiency was assessed by the following question: How often during the past 4 weeks did you get enough sleep to feel rested upon waking up? Would you say never, rarely, sometimes, often, or very often?

YES - NEVER/RARELY

NO - SOMETIMES OFTEN VERY OFTEN

baseline to one year later
change in insomnia symptoms
Periodo de tiempo: baseline to one year later

Insomnia symptoms were assessed by the following question: During the past 4 weeks, how often did you wake up in the middle of the night or early morning? (Would you say never, less than once a week, once or twice a week, or three or more times a week?)

YES - THREE OR MORE TIMES A WEEK

NO - NEVER/LESS THAN ONCE A WEEK/ONCE OR TWICE A WEEK

baseline to one year later

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Lisa F Berkman, PhD, Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH)
  • Investigador principal: Orfeu M Buxton, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital; Harvard Medical School; Harvard School of Public Health; Pennsylvania State University

Publicaciones y enlaces útiles

La persona responsable de ingresar información sobre el estudio proporciona voluntariamente estas publicaciones. Estos pueden ser sobre cualquier cosa relacionada con el estudio.

Publicaciones Generales

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio

1 de septiembre de 2009

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de diciembre de 2012

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de diciembre de 2012

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

28 de enero de 2014

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

29 de enero de 2014

Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)

30 de enero de 2014

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

15 de diciembre de 2017

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

13 de diciembre de 2017

Última verificación

1 de diciembre de 2017

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • P16633
  • U01AG027669 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
  • U01HD051218 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
  • U01HD051256 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
  • U01HD051276 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
  • U01HD051217 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
  • R01HL107240 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
  • U01OH008788 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
  • U01HD059773 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir