- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT01421914
Determining the Minimum Effective Volume of Local Anesthetic for Ultrasound-guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Study Design All patients had their demographic data recorded upon inclusion in the study. Routine preoperative monitoring was subsequently performed using ECG, non-invasive blood pressure measurements and pulse oximetry. Intravenous access was established and maintained with a crystalloid infusion.
The axillary approach using ultrasound (M-Turbo ® System with HFL 38x linear transducer 13-6 MHz, SonoSite, Bothell, WA, USA) and peripheral nerve stimulation (Stimuplex ® DIG RC, B. Braun, Melsung, Germany) guidance was performed to obtain brachial plexus block with the patient lying in the supine position. The needle used was a 22G x 50 mm (AEQ2250, BMD Group, Venezia, Italy). The puncture site was infiltrated with lidocaine 1% after asepsis and antisepsis skin treatment with chlorhexidine. After that, the ulnar, radial, median and musculocutaneous nerves were visualized by ultrasound (Figure 1) and had their identity confirmed by nerve stimulation. An initial dose of 5 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% with adrenaline (1:200,000) was injected in the proximity of each nerve. If severe pain at the injection was referred or, if nerve diameter changed during injection, injection was immediately interrupted, patient was removed form study and followed postoperatively for possible intraneural injection. The needle was repositioned during injection and perineural injected was ensured by ultrasound.
The efficacy of the block was assessed by an assessor blinded to injected volume. Assessments were conducted every 5 min up to a total of 30 min following the end of the injection of the local anaesthetic. Block assessment was finished either after surgical anaesthesia was achieved or,after 30 min had elapsed.
Success or failure of the block was used to dynamically reduce or increase, respectively, the volume of local anaesthetic that was used for the subsequent patient. When a block was achieved, the subsequent patient received a 0.5 mL reduction in the total volume of local anaesthetic per nerve. Upon failure of the block, the patient received a complementation of nerve blocks at a point distal to the axilla, and the volume of local anaesthetic delivered to the next patient was increased by 0.5 mL. After the block was assessed, the patients were cleared for surgery. During surgery, an infusion of 25-50 mcg.kg-1.min-1 of propofol was used to achieve proper sedation. Also, if during the procedure pain was referred, the block was considered failure and a conversion to general anaesthesia was performed.
After surgery, the patients were admitted to the post-anaesthetic recovery room, where they were continuously monitored using ECG as well as non-invasive blood pressure and pulse oximetry until the requirements for discharge were met. Postoperative analgesia was evaluated in the recovery room using a visual analogue pain scale (VAS) three hours after the block.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
São Paulo, Brasil, 04024-002
- Federal University of São Paulo
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- ASA 1 and 2 adult patients scheduled for ambulatorial hand surgery were included
Exclusion Criteria:
- cognitive impairment,
- coagulopathy,
- allergy to bupivacaine,
- infection at the puncture site,
- body mass index > 35 kg/m2.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Alocação: N / D
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Outro: Bupivacaine 0,5%
Single arm study
|
The study method was a step-up/step-down sequence model where the dose for following patients was determined by the outcome of the preceding block.
The starting dose of bupivacaine was 5 mL per nerve.
In the case of block failure, the dose was increased by 0.5 mL per nerve.
Conversely, block success resulted in a reduction in dose by 0.5 mL per nerve.
Each of the three nerves was treated as a separate entity.
Dose adjustments were made to each nerve individually.
The volume dose was increased in 0.5 mL at every 5 consecutive cases regardless of the result of the previous block in order to minimize bias occurence.
A blinded assistant assessed sensory and motor blockade at 5-min intervals up to 30 min.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Determining the minimum effective volume of bupivacaine 0,5% with epinephrine For successful axillary brachial plexus block for hand surgery
Prazo: A blinded Assistant assess sensory and motor blockade in a 5-min intervals up to 30 minutes.
|
Assessment of the success of ABPB A motor function score of 2 or less on the modified Bromage scale and also a lack of thermal sensitivity and response to a pinprick in the regions of the median, ulnar, radial and musculocutaneous nerves were considered characteristics of a successful block.
Moreover, the surgery should be concluded without any complementary analgesia to confirm the success of the anaesthetic procedure.
|
A blinded Assistant assess sensory and motor blockade in a 5-min intervals up to 30 minutes.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Leonardo HC Ferraro, MD, Federal University of São Paulo
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- Unifesp-USG Axillary block
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .