Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

E-vone® Use Detect Falls Among hOspitalized Patients in geRiAtric Medicine (EDORA)

2 de outubro de 2019 atualizado por: University Hospital, Angers

Usability Study of PARADE CONNECT Shoes, a Device to Detect Falls in Old People

This study evaluates the usability of a new remote warning system for fall in old people. This system is integrated in a shoe. Patients hospitalized in a geriatric ward but also their informal and professional caregivers will assess the usability of the device using a structured survey.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Desconhecido

Intervenção / Tratamento

Descrição detalhada

Falls are a major health concerned because of their frequency and severity. It is estimated that 30% of people over 65 years old and 50% of those over 85 years old fall at least once a year. Falls are also one of the main factors of morbidity, mortality and early institutionalization for old people.

Preventive measures have been implemented to limit the recurrence of falls. Most of these preventive measures are secondary and tertiary prevention programs, such as MultiFactorial Interventions (MFIs). Home-based programs are under evaluation, but evidences of their effectiveness are currently controversial. Effects of prevention programs for in and outpatients remain modest. The objectives of these interventions are to decrease the frequency of falls but also to decrease the severity of falls.

The severity of falls is due to their physical complications (found in 50 to 55% of cases), their psychological complications (40%) but it is also reflected by the subsequent hospitalizations (20%), the acceleration of dependency (50%) and the institutionalizations (40%). Falls are complicated by death in 5% of cases.

In addition, the literature on fall complications is profuse. One of these complications is the hip fracture. Hip fracture is the main cause of mortality and loss of autonomy due to falls. However, in a previous study conducted by Bloch et al. in 2009 at Cochin Hospital, several indirect evidences tended to show that mortality from falls was related to the metabolic disorders linked to the extended stay on the ground, rather than to immediate traumatic consequences. As metabolic disorders reflects the time needed to be rescued, this article highlights the importance of using early warning systems to reduce the occurrence of such complications in old frail patients living alone, and unable to get up alone from the ground.

The most commonly used warning tools are remote assistance systems (necklace or bracelet) with a button to push in case of a fall. In the study conducted by Flemming et al. in 2008, when these systems are activated, the great majority of fallers are back on their feet within one hour after the alert. Nevertheless, of 143 old people living alone and unable to get up alone from the ground, only 28 were using a warning system. The reasons for non-use are as follows: the person does not have a warning remote assistance systems, the person owns a warning remote assistance systems but was not wearing it at the time of the fall, the person was wearing a warning remote assistance systems but was forgetting (or was in difficulty) to use it.

Many research projects on fall warning and detection systems have been initiated. In the 2018 meta-analysis by Nguyen et al., fall detection systems are divided into 2 groups: a pre and a post-fall group. In the latter group, the detection systems were mainly using 3D accelerators, gyroscopes, magnetometers or smartphones with the above-mentioned devices. However, to date, there is no reliable detection system on the market because some obstacles remain. These obstacles are concerning technology but also usability. Concerning technological issue, one of the problems remains the ability of devices to detect low kinetic falls, which is common in the elderly. Concerning usability, questions are for example the problem of the voluntary activation by the user of the most common devices, or the absence of wearing the device during numerous falls.

PARADE CONNECT would remove some of the usability obstacle typically associated with remote warning systems. Indeed, the system is activated independently of the will, cognitive state and consciousness of its user. The warning system is integrated into a shoe usually worn by the old people, with probably a less stigmatizing character of aging and loss of independence. This is why it seems important to us, as a first step, to evaluate its acceptability and usability by patients.

Tipo de estudo

Observacional

Inscrição (Antecipado)

60

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

      • Angers, França, 49933 cedex 9
        • Angers University Hospital

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Método de amostragem

Amostra Não Probabilística

População do estudo

Patients are recruited during their hospitalisation in geriatric medicine. Relatives / unformal caregivers are recruited during the hospitalisation of patients in geriatric medicine. Professionnal caregivers are recruited in the acute care geriatric unit.

Descrição

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients :

    • Aged 65 years old and over
    • To be hospitalised in geriatric medicine department of Angers University Hospital
  • Unformal caregivers :

    • Family members or relatives
    • Age 18 years and over
  • Professional caregivers:

    • geriatric medicine department's staff of Angers University Hospital
    • aged of 18 years and over

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients :

    • To have motor disability or walking contraindications
    • To be under legal protection
  • Refusal of participating

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Modelos de observação: Coorte
  • Perspectivas de Tempo: Prospectivo

Coortes e Intervenções

Grupo / Coorte
Intervenção / Tratamento
old geriatric inpatients
usability assessment after 24 to 72 hours of possible use of the device (PARADE CONNECT shoes)
usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about ergonomic, questions about design, question about global satisfaction.
unformal caregivers
usability assessment after 24 to 72 hours of possible use of the device (PARADE CONNECT shoes) by their relative
usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about ergonomic, questions about design, question about global satisfaction.
professional caregivers
usability assessment after the possible use of the device (PARADE CONNECT shoes) by 40 hospitalzed old patients in the geriatrics ward
usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about ergonomic, questions about design, question about global satisfaction.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Usability of the PARADE CONNECT shoes: Average of the usability scores
Prazo: within 24 hours after removal of the device
Average of the usability scores. Usability score is calculated using the responses to the validated System Usability Scale (SUS). An average score equal or over 70/100 will be considered as satisfying.
within 24 hours after removal of the device

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Satisfaction of the PARADE CONNECT shoes: recommendation scale
Prazo: within 24 hours after removal of the device
Average recommendation score. Satisfaction score is calculated using the responses to the recommendation scale. This scale is a ten point's scale from 0 (I don't recommend at all) to 10 (I fully recommend). An average score greater than 5/10 would be acceptable, a score greater than or equal to 7/10 would be satisfactory.
within 24 hours after removal of the device
Ergonomic of the PARADE CONNECT shoes
Prazo: within 24 hours after removal of the device
Average ergonomics score: The ergonomics score is a composite score based on the average of the answers to five ergonomics questions on a four-level Likert scale. The Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The average score is reported on ten. An average score greater than 5/10 would be acceptable, a score greater than or equal to 7/10 would be satisfactory.
within 24 hours after removal of the device
Preferred shape for the PARADE CONNECT shoes
Prazo: within 24 hours after removal of the device
Three shape of shoes will be presented. Each participant will be asked about his preferred shape of shoes. The prefered shape will be the most choose shapenof shoes.
within 24 hours after removal of the device
Acceptability of the PARADE CONNECT shoes: Average acceptability score
Prazo: within 24 hours after removal of the device
Average acceptability score: The acceptability score is assessed using a closed question. The response is based on a four-level Likert scale. The Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The average score is reported on ten. An average score greater than 5/10 would be acceptable, a score greater than or equal to 7/10 would be satisfactory.
within 24 hours after removal of the device

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Cedric ANNWEILER, MD, PhD, Angers University Hospital

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Antecipado)

30 de outubro de 2019

Conclusão Primária (Antecipado)

30 de abril de 2021

Conclusão do estudo (Antecipado)

3 de maio de 2021

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

21 de agosto de 2019

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

21 de agosto de 2019

Primeira postagem (Real)

26 de agosto de 2019

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

4 de outubro de 2019

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

2 de outubro de 2019

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2019

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 2019/49

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever