Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

E-vone® Use Detect Falls Among hOspitalized Patients in geRiAtric Medicine (EDORA)

2 ottobre 2019 aggiornato da: University Hospital, Angers

Usability Study of PARADE CONNECT Shoes, a Device to Detect Falls in Old People

This study evaluates the usability of a new remote warning system for fall in old people. This system is integrated in a shoe. Patients hospitalized in a geriatric ward but also their informal and professional caregivers will assess the usability of the device using a structured survey.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Sconosciuto

Intervento / Trattamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Falls are a major health concerned because of their frequency and severity. It is estimated that 30% of people over 65 years old and 50% of those over 85 years old fall at least once a year. Falls are also one of the main factors of morbidity, mortality and early institutionalization for old people.

Preventive measures have been implemented to limit the recurrence of falls. Most of these preventive measures are secondary and tertiary prevention programs, such as MultiFactorial Interventions (MFIs). Home-based programs are under evaluation, but evidences of their effectiveness are currently controversial. Effects of prevention programs for in and outpatients remain modest. The objectives of these interventions are to decrease the frequency of falls but also to decrease the severity of falls.

The severity of falls is due to their physical complications (found in 50 to 55% of cases), their psychological complications (40%) but it is also reflected by the subsequent hospitalizations (20%), the acceleration of dependency (50%) and the institutionalizations (40%). Falls are complicated by death in 5% of cases.

In addition, the literature on fall complications is profuse. One of these complications is the hip fracture. Hip fracture is the main cause of mortality and loss of autonomy due to falls. However, in a previous study conducted by Bloch et al. in 2009 at Cochin Hospital, several indirect evidences tended to show that mortality from falls was related to the metabolic disorders linked to the extended stay on the ground, rather than to immediate traumatic consequences. As metabolic disorders reflects the time needed to be rescued, this article highlights the importance of using early warning systems to reduce the occurrence of such complications in old frail patients living alone, and unable to get up alone from the ground.

The most commonly used warning tools are remote assistance systems (necklace or bracelet) with a button to push in case of a fall. In the study conducted by Flemming et al. in 2008, when these systems are activated, the great majority of fallers are back on their feet within one hour after the alert. Nevertheless, of 143 old people living alone and unable to get up alone from the ground, only 28 were using a warning system. The reasons for non-use are as follows: the person does not have a warning remote assistance systems, the person owns a warning remote assistance systems but was not wearing it at the time of the fall, the person was wearing a warning remote assistance systems but was forgetting (or was in difficulty) to use it.

Many research projects on fall warning and detection systems have been initiated. In the 2018 meta-analysis by Nguyen et al., fall detection systems are divided into 2 groups: a pre and a post-fall group. In the latter group, the detection systems were mainly using 3D accelerators, gyroscopes, magnetometers or smartphones with the above-mentioned devices. However, to date, there is no reliable detection system on the market because some obstacles remain. These obstacles are concerning technology but also usability. Concerning technological issue, one of the problems remains the ability of devices to detect low kinetic falls, which is common in the elderly. Concerning usability, questions are for example the problem of the voluntary activation by the user of the most common devices, or the absence of wearing the device during numerous falls.

PARADE CONNECT would remove some of the usability obstacle typically associated with remote warning systems. Indeed, the system is activated independently of the will, cognitive state and consciousness of its user. The warning system is integrated into a shoe usually worn by the old people, with probably a less stigmatizing character of aging and loss of independence. This is why it seems important to us, as a first step, to evaluate its acceptability and usability by patients.

Tipo di studio

Osservativo

Iscrizione (Anticipato)

60

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Luoghi di studio

      • Angers, Francia, 49933 cedex 9
        • Angers University Hospital

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Metodo di campionamento

Campione non probabilistico

Popolazione di studio

Patients are recruited during their hospitalisation in geriatric medicine. Relatives / unformal caregivers are recruited during the hospitalisation of patients in geriatric medicine. Professionnal caregivers are recruited in the acute care geriatric unit.

Descrizione

Inclusion criteria:

  • Patients :

    • Aged 65 years old and over
    • To be hospitalised in geriatric medicine department of Angers University Hospital
  • Unformal caregivers :

    • Family members or relatives
    • Age 18 years and over
  • Professional caregivers:

    • geriatric medicine department's staff of Angers University Hospital
    • aged of 18 years and over

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients :

    • To have motor disability or walking contraindications
    • To be under legal protection
  • Refusal of participating

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Modelli osservazionali: Coorte
  • Prospettive temporali: Prospettiva

Coorti e interventi

Gruppo / Coorte
Intervento / Trattamento
old geriatric inpatients
usability assessment after 24 to 72 hours of possible use of the device (PARADE CONNECT shoes)
usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about ergonomic, questions about design, question about global satisfaction.
unformal caregivers
usability assessment after 24 to 72 hours of possible use of the device (PARADE CONNECT shoes) by their relative
usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about ergonomic, questions about design, question about global satisfaction.
professional caregivers
usability assessment after the possible use of the device (PARADE CONNECT shoes) by 40 hospitalzed old patients in the geriatrics ward
usability survey composed of subpart: System Usability Scale, questions about ergonomic, questions about design, question about global satisfaction.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Usability of the PARADE CONNECT shoes: Average of the usability scores
Lasso di tempo: within 24 hours after removal of the device
Average of the usability scores. Usability score is calculated using the responses to the validated System Usability Scale (SUS). An average score equal or over 70/100 will be considered as satisfying.
within 24 hours after removal of the device

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Satisfaction of the PARADE CONNECT shoes: recommendation scale
Lasso di tempo: within 24 hours after removal of the device
Average recommendation score. Satisfaction score is calculated using the responses to the recommendation scale. This scale is a ten point's scale from 0 (I don't recommend at all) to 10 (I fully recommend). An average score greater than 5/10 would be acceptable, a score greater than or equal to 7/10 would be satisfactory.
within 24 hours after removal of the device
Ergonomic of the PARADE CONNECT shoes
Lasso di tempo: within 24 hours after removal of the device
Average ergonomics score: The ergonomics score is a composite score based on the average of the answers to five ergonomics questions on a four-level Likert scale. The Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The average score is reported on ten. An average score greater than 5/10 would be acceptable, a score greater than or equal to 7/10 would be satisfactory.
within 24 hours after removal of the device
Preferred shape for the PARADE CONNECT shoes
Lasso di tempo: within 24 hours after removal of the device
Three shape of shoes will be presented. Each participant will be asked about his preferred shape of shoes. The prefered shape will be the most choose shapenof shoes.
within 24 hours after removal of the device
Acceptability of the PARADE CONNECT shoes: Average acceptability score
Lasso di tempo: within 24 hours after removal of the device
Average acceptability score: The acceptability score is assessed using a closed question. The response is based on a four-level Likert scale. The Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The average score is reported on ten. An average score greater than 5/10 would be acceptable, a score greater than or equal to 7/10 would be satisfactory.
within 24 hours after removal of the device

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Cedric ANNWEILER, MD, PhD, Angers University Hospital

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Anticipato)

30 ottobre 2019

Completamento primario (Anticipato)

30 aprile 2021

Completamento dello studio (Anticipato)

3 maggio 2021

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

21 agosto 2019

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

21 agosto 2019

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

26 agosto 2019

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

4 ottobre 2019

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

2 ottobre 2019

Ultimo verificato

1 settembre 2019

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio

  • 2019/49

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su usability survey

Sottoscrivi