The Effect of Different Types of Mouthwash on Extraction Sockets' Healing
3 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Ahmad Abdel-Salam Hamdan, University of Jordan
A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Different Types of Mouthwash on the Healing of Extraction Sockets
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effect of four different types of mouthwash on socket healing after surgical extractions in male or female patients aged 18 years and older who have a unilateral impacted mandibular third molar indicated for extraction. The main questions it aims to answer are:
The effect of Bone Bioactive Liquid (BBL) mouthwash, Hyaluronic Acid (HA) mouthwash, the Chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) mouthwash and Warm Saline Mouth Rinse (WSMR) on socket healing after surgical extractions.
The effect of BBL mouthwash, HA mouthwash, the CHX mouthwash and WSMR on patient related factors and their quality of life.
Recruited Participants will be randomized into four intervention groups:
- First group will receive BBL mouthwash.
- The second group will receive CHX mouthwash.
- The third group will be prescribed HA mouthwash.
- The fourth group will receive Warm Saline Mouth Rinse.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Recrutamento
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Estimado)
100
Estágio
- Fase 4
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Ahmad Hamdan, Ph.D. in Periodontics
- Número de telefone: + 962779099199
- E-mail: Ahmad.hamdan@ju.edu.jo
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Amman, Jordânia, 11941
- Recrutamento
- University of Jordan hospital
-
Contato:
- Ahmad Hamdan, Ph.D. in Periodontics
- Número de telefone: + 962779099199
- E-mail: Ahmad.hamdan@ju.edu.jo
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Não
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female patients aged 18 years and older who have a unilateral impacted mandibular third molar that is indicated for extraction with bone removal and the presence of an adjacent second molar.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Soft tissue impaction that will not need any bone removal.
- Presence of any acute oral infection including active Pericoronitis.
- Patients who have undergone radiotherapy in the head and neck region, chemotherapy or systemic long-term corticosteroid treatment.
- Patients receiving medications known to induce gingival hyperplasia; anticonvulsant (phenytoin), immunosuppressant (cyclosporine A), and various calcium channel blockers (nifedipine, verapamil, diltiazem).
- Patients who have taken systemic antibiotics less than 3 months prior to baseline.
- Presence of uncontrolled diabetes, severe nutritional deficiencies and endocrine disturbances.
- Presence of immune deficiency or any immune disease.
- Intravenous bisphosphonates or Oral bisphosphonate intake for more than 3 years.
- Smokers and alcoholics.
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- Hypersensitivity to one of the ingredients listed in any of the mouthwashes, especially chlorhexidine as reactions to this has been reported in the literature.
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Cuidados de suporte
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Quadruplicar
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador Ativo: Bone Bioactive Liquid
Bone bioactive liquid (BBL) is a saline solution used as a mouthwash that contains calcium chloride (CaCl2) and magnesium dichloride hexahydrate (MgCl2-6H2O) with a net negative charge.
|
Prescribed for 7 days period 2 times a day starting 24 hours post-extraction.
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Chlorhexidine Gluconate
It is a strong bisbiguanide base, with cationic structure at physiological pH (positively charged), and has a broad-spectrum antibacterial activity that works against Gram-positive and Gram- negative bacteria and certain mycetes.
|
Prescribed for 7 days period 2 times a day starting 24 hours post-extraction, the patient is instructed to pour 10 ml of the mouthwash into a measuring cup, rinse for 1 minute at an alternative time to teeth brushing.
Do not eat or drink for 30 min after use.
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Warm Saline Mouth Rinse
Prescribing WSMR as a prophylactic postoperatively is due to the fact that the heat of the solution results in a therapeutic increase in blood flow to the extraction socket.
|
Prescribed for 7 days period 2 times a day starting 24 hours post-extraction.
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Hyaluronic Acid mouthwash
It is a high molecular weight non-sulphated polysaccharide.
It is biocompatible, non-immunogenic, biodegradable, viscoelastic that make it a preferable biomaterial for medical and pharmaceutical applications without adverse events.
|
Prescribed for 7 days period 3-4 times a day starting 24 hours post-extraction, the patient is instructed to pour 20 ml of the mouthwash into a measuring cup and rinse for 1 minute, at an alternative time to teeth brushing.
Do not eat or drink for 30 mins after use.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Extraction socket soft tissue healing
Prazo: Measured at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
Using a new socket wound healing scale that is a combination of the gingival healing index of Landry et al. and the wound healing scale used by Cervelli et al. to assess the post-extraction wounds in terms of wound dehiscence, epithelialization, quality of granulation tissue filling the post-extraction socket, and depth between early granulation tissue and wound margin. A blunt periodontal probe with millimetric markers will be used for this assessment to score a number between 0 (best) and 4 (worst) for the healing socket. |
Measured at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Extraction socket Bone healing
Prazo: Radiographs will be taken at baseline and at 6 months after extraction.
|
Using panoramic radiographs and following the Longitudinal radiographic assessment (LRA) technique categorized as: A. The empty socket is completely radiolucent, and lamina dura is observed clearly around the socket.
B. Socket region is hazy and lamina dura is observed around the socket.
C.
There is a mixed radiolucent-radiopaque appearance inside the socket and lamina dura has been partially disappeared.
D. Mature bone is seen inside the socket and lamina dura has disappeared completely (no difference between the socket and normal bone).
|
Radiographs will be taken at baseline and at 6 months after extraction.
|
|
The resulting periodontal defect of the adjacent second molar
Prazo: Preoperatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, we may call the patients for further assessment at 9 and 12 months
|
Will be evaluated using a UNC 15 perio probe with three clinical parameters: the first is probing depth (PD) measured in mm at three sites of the second molar tooth: Distal (D), disto-buccal (DB), and disto-lingual (DL).
|
Preoperatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, we may call the patients for further assessment at 9 and 12 months
|
|
The resulting periodontal defect of the adjacent second molar
Prazo: Preoperatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, we may call the patients for further assessment at 9 and 12 months
|
Will be evaluated using a UNC 15 perio probe with three clinical parameters: the second is gingival recession (GR) measured in mm at three sites of the second molar tooth: Distal (D), disto-buccal (DB), and disto-lingual (DL).
|
Preoperatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, we may call the patients for further assessment at 9 and 12 months
|
|
The resulting periodontal defect of the adjacent second molar
Prazo: Preoperatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, we may call the patients for further assessment at 9 and 12 months
|
Will be evaluated using a UNC 15 perio probe with three clinical parameters: the third is bleeding on probing (BOP) measured as present or not at three sites of the second molar tooth: Distal (D), disto-buccal (DB), and disto-lingual (DL).
|
Preoperatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, we may call the patients for further assessment at 9 and 12 months
|
|
Quality of life of the patients (QOL) after extraction
Prazo: At 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
Assessed based on a questionnaire that addresses different aspects including social and work isolation, ability to eat and speak, impairment of sleep schedule, their physical appearance related to swelling, bleeding and Paresthesia.
Answers to the presented questions are in the form of a four-point scale regarding their experience at the time the participants given the form to fill.
|
At 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
|
Pain at the extraction side
Prazo: At 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
Assessed using a 10cm long visual analog scale (VAS) where 0= no pain and 10= maximum amount of pain.
|
At 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
|
Trismus
Prazo: Pre-operatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
By measuring the interincisal distance at the maximum mouth opening pre-operatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively, then the difference between pre- and postoperative will be taken.
|
Pre-operatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
|
Facial swelling at the extraction side
Prazo: Preoperatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
Assessed using a soft tape to measure the distance between the lowest point of the tragus and the soft tissue pogonion, the lowest point of the tragus and the lateral corner of the mouth, the lateral corner of the eye and the angle of the mandible.
These measurements will be taken preoperatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
Then the difference between the pre-operative and postoperative values will be divided by the value obtained in the preoperative period and multiplied by 100 to have the final percentage for the post-operative day.
|
Preoperatively and at 3, 7, 14 days, 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
|
Socio-demographic factors and medical history
Prazo: Once preoperatively.
|
Data taken from participants using a form.
|
Once preoperatively.
|
|
Peri-operative factors
Prazo: During the surgical procedure.
|
Operation time (min) categorized as <=20, >20 to 30, >30 to 40, >40.
|
During the surgical procedure.
|
|
Peri-operative factors
Prazo: During the surgical procedure.
|
Amount of anesthesia administered.
|
During the surgical procedure.
|
|
Peri-operative factors
Prazo: During the surgical procedure.
|
Tooth sectioning (done, not done).
|
During the surgical procedure.
|
|
Peri-operative factors
Prazo: During the surgical procedure.
|
The surgeon's perception of difficulty categorized as <=9, >9 to 12, >12 to 16, >16.
|
During the surgical procedure.
|
|
Pre-operative factors
Prazo: Once preoperatively.
|
The radiographic anatomical relationship between the tooth roots and mandibular canal as it appears on the radiographic image taken preoperatively, categorized as: No association between root structure and the superior border of the canal, Root structure impinging the superior border of canal, Overlapping root structure and canal.
|
Once preoperatively.
|
|
Pre-operative factors
Prazo: Once preoperatively.
|
Prior symptoms related to the third molar to be extracted categorized as: present, absent.
|
Once preoperatively.
|
|
Pre-operative factors
Prazo: Once preoperatively.
|
Indication for the surgical extraction of the third molar categorized as: prophylactic extraction, pain related to the third molar, orthodontic indication.
|
Once preoperatively.
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Ahmad Hamdan, Ph.D. in Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry - University of Jordan
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Publicações Gerais
- Araujo MG, Silva CO, Misawa M, Sukekava F. Alveolar socket healing: what can we learn? Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun;68(1):122-34. doi: 10.1111/prd.12082.
- Afat IM, Akdogan ET, Gonul O. Effects of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin alone and combined with hyaluronic acid on early soft tissue healing after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A prospective clinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Feb;47(2):280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
- Varoni E, Tarce M, Lodi G, Carrassi A. Chlorhexidine (CHX) in dentistry: state of the art. Minerva Stomatol. 2012 Sep;61(9):399-419. English, Italian.
- Ibraheem W, Jedaiba WH, Alnami AM, Hussain Baiti LA, Ali Manqari SM, Bhati A, Almarghlani A, Assaggaf M. Efficacy of hyaluronic acid gel and spray in healing of extraction wound: a randomized controlled study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 May;26(10):3444-3449. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202205_28838.
- Kim JJ, Song HY, Ben Amara H, Kyung-Rim K, Koo KT. Hyaluronic Acid Improves Bone Formation in Extraction Sockets With Chronic Pathology: A Pilot Study in Dogs. J Periodontol. 2016 Jul;87(7):790-5. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.150707. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
- Koray M, Ofluoglu D, Onal EA, Ozgul M, Ersev H, Yaltirik M, Tanyeri H. Efficacy of hyaluronic acid spray on swelling, pain, and trismus after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Nov;43(11):1399-403. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.05.003. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
- Sasaki T, Watanabe C. Stimulation of osteoinduction in bone wound healing by high-molecular hyaluronic acid. Bone. 1995 Jan;16(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(94)00001-8.
- Yamada SI, Hasegawa T, Yoshimura N, Hakoyama Y, Nitta T, Hirahara N, Miyamoto H, Yoshimura H, Ueda N, Yamamura Y, Okuyama H, Takizawa A, Nakanishi Y, Iwata E, Akita D, Itoh R, Kubo K, Kondo S, Hata H, Koyama Y, Miyamoto Y, Nakahara H, Akashi M, Kirita T, Shibuya Y, Umeda M, Kurita H. Prevalence of and risk factors for postoperative complications after lower third molar extraction: A multicenter prospective observational study in Japan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 12;101(32):e29989. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029989.
- Osunde OD, Adebola RA, Adeoye JB, Bassey GO. Comparative study of the effect of warm saline mouth rinse on complications after dental extractions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;43(5):649-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
- Adekunle AA, Egbunah UP, Erinoso OA, Adeyemo WL. Effectiveness of warm saline mouth bath in preventing alveolar osteitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Oct;49(10):980-988. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.09.001. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
- Cho H, Lynham AJ, Hsu E. Postoperative interventions to reduce inflammatory complications after third molar surgery: review of the current evidence. Aust Dent J. 2017 Dec;62(4):412-419. doi: 10.1111/adj.12526. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
- Maria de Souza G, Elias GM, Pereira de Andrade PF, Andrade Sales KN, Galvao EL, Moreira Falci SG. The Effectiveness of Hyaluronic Acid in Controlling Pain, Edema, and Trismus After Extraction of Third Molars: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Dec;78(12):2154.e1-2154.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
- Canellas JVDS, Fraga SRG, Santoro MF, Netto JNS, Tinoco EMB. Intrasocket interventions to prevent alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar surgery: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2020 Sep;48(9):902-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
- Yilmaz N, Demirtas N, Kazancioglu HO, Bayer S, Acar AH, Mihmanli A. The efficacy of hyaluronic acid in postextraction sockets of impacted third molars: A pilot study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017 Dec;20(12):1626-1631. doi: 10.4103/1119-3077.224131.
- Gocmen G, Gonul O, Oktay NS, Yarat A, Goker K. The antioxidant and anti-inflammatory efficiency of hyaluronic acid after third molar extraction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Sep;43(7):1033-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 May 6.
- Rodrigues SV, Acharya AB, Bhadbhade S, Thakur SL. Hyaluronan-containing mouthwash as an adjunctive plaque-control agent. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2010;8(4):389-94.
- Romano CL, De Vecchi E, Bortolin M, Morelli I, Drago L. Hyaluronic Acid and Its Composites as a Local Antimicrobial/Antiadhesive Barrier. J Bone Jt Infect. 2017 Jan 1;2(1):63-72. doi: 10.7150/jbji.17705. eCollection 2017.
- Phillips C, White RP Jr, Shugars DA, Zhou X. Risk factors associated with prolonged recovery and delayed healing after third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Dec;61(12):1436-48. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.08.003.
- Gizligoz B, Ince Kuka G, Tunar OL, Ozkan Karaca E, Gursoy H, Kuru B. Plaque Inhibitory Effect of Hyaluronan-Containing Mouthwash in a 4-Day Non-Brushing Model. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Feb 14;18(1):61-70. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a43936.
- Ferres-Amat E, Al Madhoun A, Ferres-Amat E, Al Demour S, Ababneh MA, Ferres-Padro E, Marti C, Carrio N, Barajas M, Atari M. Histologic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of a New Bioactive Liquid BBL on Implant Surface: A Preclinical Study in Foxhound Dogs. Materials (Basel). 2021 Oct 19;14(20):6217. doi: 10.3390/ma14206217.
- Ferres-Amat E, Al Madhoun A, Ferres-Amat E, Carrio N, Barajas M, Al-Madhoun AS, Ferres-Padro E, Marti C, Atari M. Comparison of 0.12% Chlorhexidine and a New Bone Bioactive Liquid, BBL, in Mouthwash for Oral Wound Healing: A Randomized, Double Blind Clinical Human Trial. J Pers Med. 2022 Oct 16;12(10):1725. doi: 10.3390/jpm12101725.
- Oginni FO, Ugboko VI, Assam E, Ogunbodede EO. Postoperative complaints following impacted mandibular third molar surgery in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. SADJ. 2002 Jul;57(7):264-8.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
10 de agosto de 2025
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
1 de dezembro de 2026
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
1 de dezembro de 2026
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
31 de agosto de 2024
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
4 de setembro de 2024
Primeira postagem (Real)
19 de setembro de 2024
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
7 de maio de 2026
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
3 de maio de 2026
Última verificação
1 de maio de 2026
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 224000195
- 284/2023-2024 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: University of Jordan)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
SIM
Descrição do plano IPD
The plan is to share only IPD used in the results publication
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
Beginning from publication with no end date
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
The principal investigator will review requests for IPD sharing according to the predetermined set of criteria.
The criteria that must be met in order for data to be shared are: having a study protocol that has been approved by an independent review committee identified for IPD meta-analyses.
The study protocol must be submitted through email then when reviewed data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
The data requestor will be provided with the IPD file that can be accessed by them only by having their email listed as a viewer in the sharing list of a folder stored on the DropBox website, this folder has the data excel sheet file and the study protocol as the supporting material.
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .