Endoscopic Versus Conventional Lumbar Decompression for Lumbar Canal Stenosis (ENDOLSS)
Outcomes Evaluation of Interlaminar Endoscopic Uniportal Bilateral Lumbar Decompression Versus Open Laminectomy for Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Descrição detalhada
This randomized controlled trial was designed to compare the clinical and surgical outcomes of interlaminar uniportal endoscopic bilateral lumbar decompression versus conventional open laminectomy in patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar canal stenosis. Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common degenerative condition that results in neurogenic claudication, radicular pain, and functional disability due to compression of neural elements.
The study was conducted at Ain Shams University Hospitals and Damanhour Medical National Institute. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were diagnosed based on clinical evaluation and radiological confirmation using MRI. Eligible patients were randomized into two groups: one group underwent minimally invasive interlaminar uniportal endoscopic bilateral decompression, while the other group underwent conventional open laminectomy.
The primary objective of the study was to compare the effectiveness of both surgical techniques in terms of pain relief and functional improvement. Secondary objectives included comparison of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, complication rates, muscle injury markers, and time to return to normal activity.
Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using standardized clinical assessment tools. Postoperative follow-up was conducted at one day postoperative period, one month, and six months to assess both early and mid-term outcomes.
The hypothesis of the study is that minimally invasive endoscopic decompression provides equivalent or superior clinical outcomes compared to conventional open laminectomy, with the advantage of reduced tissue trauma, less postoperative pain, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stay.
This study aims to contribute to the growing evidence supporting minimally invasive spine surgery techniques and to provide high-quality comparative data to guide surgical decision-making in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Cairo, Egito
- Ain shams university hospitals
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients diagnosed with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis based on clinical and radiological findings.
Patients presenting with neurogenic claudication and/or radicular leg pain. Patients indicated for surgical decompression after failure of conservative treatment.
Age 18 years and above. Patients able to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with previous lumbar spine surgery at the same level. Patients with spinal instability requiring fusion. Presence of spinal infection, tumor, or traumatic pathology. Severe comorbid conditions contraindicating surgery. Patients with incomplete clinical or follow-up data.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Endoscopic Decompression Group
Patients undergo interlaminar uniportal endoscopic bilateral lumbar decompression for treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
|
Minimally invasive interlaminar uniportal endoscopic decompression of the lumbar spinal canal performed for treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
The procedure aims to relieve neural compression while preserving posterior spinal structures and reducing tissue trauma compared to open surgery.
Outros nomes:
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Open Laminectomy Group
Patients undergo conventional open laminectomy for treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis
|
Standard open lumbar laminectomy performed for decompression of the spinal canal in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
The procedure involves removal of posterior bony and ligamentous structures to relieve neural compression.
Outros nomes:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Disability (Oswestry Disability Index - ODI)
Prazo: Preoperative, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative
|
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) will be used to evaluate functional disability related to lumbar spinal stenosis.
The ODI is a validated questionnaire assessing limitations in activities of daily living, including pain intensity, personal care, walking, sitting, standing, and social function.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Outcomes will be compared between patients undergoing interlaminar endoscopic and conventional open lumbar decompression.
|
Preoperative, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative
|
|
Postoperative Leg Pain (VAS-Leg Score)
Prazo: Preoperative, 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative
|
Radicular leg pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a validated 10-point scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
Patients will rate their leg pain intensity preoperatively and at follow-up intervals.
This measure reflects the severity of nerve root compression symptoms and will be used to compare the effectiveness of interlaminar endoscopic versus conventional open lumbar decompression
|
Preoperative, 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative
|
|
Postoperative Back Pain (VAS-Back Score)
Prazo: Preoperative, 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative
|
Low back pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), a validated patient-reported outcome measure ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
This scale evaluates the severity of axial back pain associated with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.
Measurements will be obtained preoperatively and at follow-up intervals to compare pain relief between interlaminar endoscopic and conventional open lumbar decompression techniques.
|
Preoperative, 1 day, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative
|
|
Claudication Distance
Prazo: Preoperative, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative
|
Claudication distance will be assessed as the maximum walking distance a patient can achieve before the onset of neurogenic claudication symptoms, such as leg pain, numbness, or weakness.
This measure reflects functional limitation due to lumbar spinal stenosis and will be used to evaluate improvement after interlaminar endoscopic versus open lumbar decompression.
|
Preoperative, 1 month, and 6 months postoperative
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Operative Time
Prazo: Intraoperative
|
Duration of surgery measured in hours from skin incision to wound closure in patients undergoing endoscopic versus open lumbar decompression.
|
Intraoperative
|
|
Length of Hospital Stay
Prazo: From surgery to hospital discharge (typically within 1-5 days postoperative)
|
Duration of hospitalization measured in days from surgery to discharge.
|
From surgery to hospital discharge (typically within 1-5 days postoperative)
|
|
Postoperative Complications
Prazo: Up to 6 months postoperative
|
Incidence of postoperative complications including infection, dural tear, neurological deficit, and reoperation.
|
Up to 6 months postoperative
|
|
Time to Return to Work
Prazo: Up to 6 months postoperative
|
Time taken for patients to resume normal daily activities or return to work after surgery.
|
Up to 6 months postoperative
|
|
Creatine Phosphokinase (CPK) Level
Prazo: 1 day postoperative
|
Serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels will be measured as a biomarker of muscle injury associated with surgical intervention.
Levels will be compared between endoscopic and open lumbar decompression groups to assess the degree of muscle damage.
|
1 day postoperative
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Mohammad Yousof Aboukila, MD, Ain Shams University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Aboukila MY, et al. "Outcomes Evaluation of Interlaminar Endoscopic Uniportal Bilateral Lumbar Decompression versus Open Laminectomy for Degenerative Lumbar Canal Stenosis." Ain Shams University, Department of Neurosurgery, 2026. (Unpublished clinical study / thesis)
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- FMASU MD323/2023
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
produto fabricado e exportado dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .