- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT07569549
Surgery for Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: Joint Replacement vs. Trapeziectomy (BASTION)
BASTION - BASe of Thumb Osteoarthritis Management Non-inferiority Trial: Surgical Treatment of First Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Comparison Between Joint Replacement and Trapeziectomy
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the surgical method with total joint arthroplasty, (TOUCH joint prosthesis), is as good as or better than the traditional surgical method, trapezectomy, to treat thumb base joint osteoarthritis.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does surgery with total joint arthroplasty provide better power grip and pinch grip strength compared to traditional surgery?
What is the long-term risk of complications for both methods?
Which method is more cost-effective for the healthcare system?
Researchers will compare total joint arthroplasty (TOUCH) to trapezectomy (a procedure where a bone in the thumb base is removed) to see which method provides the best results for the patient.
Participants will:
Be randomized to undergo either an operation with total joint arthroplasty or a trapezectomy.
Undergo an initial evaluation and a health economic cost analysis after one year.
Attend follow-up checkups at 2, 5, and 10 years post-surgery to evaluate long-term function and the durability of the prosthesis.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Background and Rationale:
Basal joint arthritis of the thumb (trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis) is a common condition causing pain and reduced hand function. While trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction/capsuloplasty has long been a gold standard, total joint arthroplasty, such as the TOUCH prosthesis, has gained popularity. However, there is a lack of high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing these methods regarding long-term functional outcomes, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness. This study aims to compare the clinical and health-economic outcomes of total joint arthroplasty with TOUCH prosthesis versus trapeziectomy with capsuloplasty.
Study Design and Randomization:
This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Following informed consent obtained by the attending surgeon, participants are randomized to either:
- Total joint arthroplasty using the TOUCH prosthesis.
- Trapeziectomy with capsuloplasty. Randomization is performed in close proximity to the day of surgery. Due to the nature of the interventions, participants are informed of the surgical method postoperatively.
Procedures and Follow-up
- Surgical Intervention: Both procedures are performed according to standardized institutional protocols.
- Postoperative Care (Trapeziectomy): The thumb is immobilized in a cast for 3 weeks, followed by a standardized rehabilitation program led by occupational and physical therapists.
- Postoperative Care (total joint arthroplasty): A stable soft dressing is applied for 3 weeks, followed by the same rehabilitation protocol.
- Follow-up Schedule: Participants are evaluated at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, and 10 years postoperatively.
- Imaging: Radiographic evaluations are performed for the prosthesis group at 6 weeks, 12 months, 24 months, 5 years, and 10 years to monitor for prosthesis loosening or "z-deformity" (MCP joint hyperextension) compared to the trapeziectomy group.
Data Management and Quality Assurance:
Data is collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) to ensure data integrity and validation. Physical informed consent forms are stored securely at the Department of Hand Surgery. Source data verification is performed by comparing registry data against electronic medical records and paper-based Case Report Forms (CRFs).
Sample Size and Power Calculation:
The primary outcome is Jamar grip strength at 12 months. Based on a Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of 6.5 kg and a standard deviation (SD) of 8.5 kg (derived from existing literature and pilot data), a power calculation (90% power, alpha 0.05, two-sided t-test) determined a requirement of 37 patients per group. To account for a 10% dropout rate, the total cohort size is set at 84 patients (42 per arm).
Health Economic Analysis:
A comprehensive health economic evaluation will be conducted to compare the total costs of both methods. This analysis includes:
- Direct Costs: Implant costs, anesthesia, surgical time, and healthcare utilization (number of visits).
- Indirect Costs: Duration of sick leave and time to return to work.
- Secondary Metrics: Analgesic consumption (paracetamol and opioids), patient-reported quality of life (EQ-5D), and "pain-free days" based on NRS (Numerical Rating Scale) assessments.
The objective is to determine if the higher initial cost of the TOUCH prosthesis is offset by faster recovery, reduced sick leave, and improved long-term productivity.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Estimado)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Contato de estudo
- Nome: Eva Nordin, Clinical research nurse
- Número de telefone: +46(0) 186119630
- E-mail: eva.nordin@akademiska.se
Estude backup de contato
- Nome: Elias Gardell, MD, attending hand surgeon
- Número de telefone: +46 (0) 186171544
- E-mail: elias.gardell@uu.se
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Uppsala, Suécia
- Recrutamento
- Department of Handsurgery, Uppsala University Hospital
-
Contato:
- Elias Gardell, MD, attending hand surgeon
- Número de telefone: +46(0) 186171544
- E-mail: elias.gardell@uu.se
-
Contato:
- Sara Edsfeldt, MD, PhD, senior attending
- Número de telefone: +46 (0) 186119031
- E-mail: sara.edsfeldt@uu.se
-
Investigador principal:
- Sara Edsfeldt, MD, PhD, senior attending
-
Örebro, Suécia
- Ainda não está recrutando
- Örebro University Hospital
-
Contato:
- Eva Lundqvist, MD, PhD, senior attending
- Número de telefone: +46(0) 196025175
- E-mail: eva.lundqvist@regionorebrolan.se
-
Investigador principal:
- Eva Lundqvist, MD, PhD, senior attending
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
- Adulto
- Adulto mais velho
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 40-80 years at inclusion
- CMC-joint osteoarthritis grade 1-3 (Eaton-Littler classification)
- Rest pain or pain reducing hand function with indication for surgery
- Insufficient relief from non-operative treatment for ≥3 months (orthosis, OTC analgesics, cortisone injection)
- Eligible for both prosthesis and trapezectomy per including surgeon
- Non-smoker or complete smoking cessation ≥6 weeks prior to surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous surgery to thumb base or STT-joint
- Ongoing chronic pain condition
- Dementia or cognitive impairment
- Trapezium height <7 mm on plain radiograph
- Active smoker
- Osteoarthritis grade 4 (Eaton-Littler)
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Arm 1 -Dual Mobility Prosthesis (TOUCH)
TOUCH Total Joint Arthroplasty (n=42).
Implantation of TOUCH trapeziometacarpal prosthesis (Kerimedical).
Soft bandage for 3 weeks postoperatively, followed by rehabilitation per national guidelines.
|
Surgical implantation of the TOUCH trapeziometacarpal total joint prosthesis (Kerimedical).
The prosthesis consists of an uncemented stainless steel stem inserted into the first metacarpal and a dual cup mobility system with a polyethylene ball articulating against a metal cup fixed in the trapezium.
The stem is available in straight or 15-degree angled neck configurations.
Postoperative management consists of a stable soft dressing for 3 weeks to allow early controlled mobilization, followed by a standardized hand therapy rehabilitation protocol.
Outros nomes:
|
|
Comparador Ativo: Arm 2 - Trapeziectomy and Capsular Reconstruction
Trapezectomy with capsuloplasty (n=42).
Excision of trapezium with dorsal capsule flap capsuloplasty.
Cast immobilization for 3 weeks postoperatively, followed by rehabilitation per national guidelines.
|
Surgical excision of the trapezium bone (trapeziectomy) followed by capsuloplasty using a distally based dorsal capsular flap, without tendon interposition.
The capsular flap is sutured to stabilize the base of the first metacarpal.
No implant or tendon graft is used.
Postoperatively, a cast immobilizing the thumb in functional position is applied for 3 weeks, followed by a standardized hand therapy rehabilitation protocol.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Hand grip strength
Prazo: Measured at 12 months postoperatively
|
Hand grip strength (JAMAR dynamometer) at 12 months post operatively
|
Measured at 12 months postoperatively
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Key-pinch grip strength
Prazo: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 12 months postoperatively
|
Key-pinch strength measured by pinch-gauge in kilograms
|
Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Pinch grip strength
Prazo: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
3-finger pinch strength measured by pinch gauge in kilograms
|
Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Postoperative Pain Intensity on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Prazo: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
Pain measured with the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and load, where 0 is "no pain" and 10 is "worst imaginable pain"
|
Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Range of movement
Prazo: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
Range of movement of thumb measured by physiotherapist.
Extension, flexion, volar abduction, radial abduction.
In degrees.
|
Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Metacarpophalangeal (MCP)-joint hyperextension
Prazo: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
Radiographic MCP-joint hyperextension (Z-deformity)
|
Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Complications
Prazo: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
Complications, such as trigger thumb, de Quervain's, reoperation, and infection, reported within 12 months of surgery.
|
Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Use of analgesics
Prazo: Measured at 12 months postoperatively
|
Total usage of analgesic during the post operative period.
|
Measured at 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Duration of sick leave
Prazo: Measured at 12 months postoperatively
|
Total duration of sick leave.
|
Measured at 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Patient-reported outcomes EQ-5D
Prazo: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
Patient-reported outcome of the hand surgery using validated questionnaire EQ-5D
|
Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Patient-reported outcomes PRWHE
Prazo: Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
Patient-reported outcome of the hand surgery using validated questionnaire PRWHE
|
Measured at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months postoperatively
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Diretor de estudo: Nils Hailer, MD, PhD. Professor, Department of orthopaedics and hand surgery, Akademiska hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
- Investigador principal: Sara Edsfeldt, MD, PhD, senior attending, Department of orthopaedics and hand surgery, Akademiska hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
- Cadeira de estudo: Sara Edsfeldt, MD, PhD, senior attending, Department of orthopaedics and hand surgery, Akademiska hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Kim JK, Park MG, Shin SJ. What is the minimum clinically important difference in grip strength? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2536-41. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3666-y. Epub 2014 May 10.
- Lang CE, Edwards DF, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW. Estimating minimal clinically important differences of upper-extremity measures early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Sep;89(9):1693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.02.022.
- Kriegs-Au G, Petje G, Fojtl E, Ganger R, Zachs I. Ligament reconstruction with or without tendon interposition to treat primary thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):209-18. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00001.
- Bohannon RW. Minimal clinically important difference for grip strength: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2019 Jan;31(1):75-78. doi: 10.1589/jpts.31.75. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
- Werle S, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Simmen BR, Sprott H, Herren DB. Age- and gender-specific normative data of grip and pinch strength in a healthy adult Swiss population. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009 Feb;34(1):76-84. doi: 10.1177/1753193408096763. Epub 2009 Jan 7.
- Herren DB, Marks M, Neumeister S, Schindele S. Low complication rate and high implant survival at 2 years after Touch(R) trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2023 Oct;48(9):877-883. doi: 10.1177/17531934231179581. Epub 2023 Jun 13.
- Kierkegaard M, Petitclerc E, Hebert LJ, Mathieu J, Gagnon C. Responsiveness of performance-based outcome measures for mobility, balance, muscle strength and manual dexterity in adults with myotonic dystrophy type 1. J Rehabil Med. 2018 Feb 28;50(3):269-277. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2304.
- Draak TH, Pruppers MH, van Nes SI, Vanhoutte EK, Bakkers M, Gorson KC, Van der Pol WL, Lewis RA, Notermans NC, Nobile-Orazio E, Leger JM, Van den Bergh PY, Lauria G, Bril V, Katzberg H, Lunn MP, Pouget J, van der Kooi AJ, van den Berg LH, van Doorn PA, Cornblath DR, Hahn AF, Faber CG, Merkies IS; PeriNomS study group. Grip strength comparison in immune-mediated neuropathies: Vigorimeter vs. Jamar. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2015 Sep;20(3):269-76. doi: 10.1111/jns.12126.
- Guzzini M, Arioli L, Annibaldi A, Pecchia S, Latini F, Ferretti A. Interposition Arthroplasty versus Dual Cup Mobility Prosthesis in Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Randomized Study. Hand (N Y). 2024 Nov;19(8):1260-1268. doi: 10.1177/15589447231185584. Epub 2023 Jul 23.
- Newton A, Talwalkar S. Arthroplasty in thumb trapeziometacarpal (CMC joint) osteoarthritis: An alternative to excision arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2022 Nov 26;35:134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.11.011. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Estimado)
Conclusão Primária (Estimado)
Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
- Análise de custo-benefício
- Estudos Prospectivos
- Força de preensão
- prótese
- Primeira Articulação Carpometacarpiana
- Estudo comparativo
- Ensaio controlado randomizado (RCT)
- Rizartrose
- Trapeziectomia
- Volte ao trabalho
- cirurgia de mão
- Osteoartrite do polegar
- Estudo Prospectivo
- EQ-5D
- Artroplastia Total da Articulação
- Qualidade de Vida (QV)
- Medidas de resultados relatados pelo paciente (PROMs)
- Economia saudável
- QuickDASH
- Qualidade de Vida Relacionada à Saúde (QVRS)
- Força de Aperto
- Análise de custo-efetividade
- Reconstrução Cirúrgica
- Articulação Trapézio-Metacarpiana
- Thumb base arthroplasty
- CMC joint
- Dual Mobility Prosthesis
- Total Joint Replacement
- Ligament Reconstruction
- Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- Dnr2026-00547-01
- 2026-00547-01 (Outro identificador: Swedish Ethical Review Authority)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD
Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD
Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD
- PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
- SEIVA
- CIF
- CSR
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .