Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

V-Reverse Suture Technique Compared to Traditional Anchored Sling Suture in Treating Multiple Gingival Recession

18 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Reem Abdel-Hafez, King Abdullah University Hospital

Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel for Root Coverage With Sling Suture VS. V-Reverse Suture: A Slit-Mouth Pilot Study

The goal of this split-mouth pilot study is to study the effect of two different suturing techniques in root coverage using coronally advanced flap tunnel in multiple adjacent recession cases to see which technique will give superior outcomes in term of mean root coverage percentage, and root coverage esthetic score after 3-months.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does a suturing technique gives superior mean root coverage percentage over another?
  • Does a suturing technique gives superior root coverage esthetic score?

Researcher will compare between V-reverse suturing technique and anchored sling suture to see which will result in superior mean root coverage percentage, and root coverage esthetic score after 3-months.

Participants will:

  • Come in for a first visit to check your gum health, check eligibility and to be provided with scaling and polishing if needed.
  • Come in for surgery and clinical measurements.
  • Participant will be asked to complete post-operative questionnaire for 14 days.
  • Re-evaluated after 1 week and suture removal at 2 weeks.
  • Follow-up after 1 and 3 months.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

This split-moth pilot study is designed to assess the comparative effectiveness of V-reverse suturing technique(test) and anchored sling suturing technique (Control) in patients with bilateral multiple adjacent gingival recession. The primary aim of the study is to compare the test and control groups in terms of the obtained mean root coverage (mRC) and Root coverage esthetic score (RES) in 3 months. The secondary aims are to compare the two groups in terms of Complete root coverage (CRC), Keratinized tissue width (KTW), Gingival thickness (GT), Recession depth (REC), Probing depth (PD), and Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction.

At surgery day (T0) baseline measurements and photographs will be taken for all participants and they will be treated with coronally advanced tunnel with autogenous connective tissue graft harvested from the palate for both sides. Each side will be randomly allocated for either V-reverse suturing technique (test) or anchored sling suturing technique (control) to advance the tunnel coronally. At the end of the surgery postoperative instructions will be delivered to all patients in a written and oral manner, in conjunction with a medical prescription, and post-operative questionnaire to fill for the next 14 days to capture patient-reported experience measures (PREMs).

Participants will be re-evaluated at 1 week and at 2 weeks sutures will be removed.

At (T1) 1 month after surgery the following parameters will be recorded : bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), and recession depth.

At (T2) 3 month after surgery the following parameters will be recorded : bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), recession depth, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), gingival thickness (GT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), Root coverage esthetic score (RES), mean root coverage% (mRC%), and complete root coverage(cRC "YES/NO")..

Visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- very dissatisfied, 0- very satisfied) at each visit after surgery was taken to assess patients overall satisfaction, and another visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- worst pain, 0- no pain) to assess patients perceptions of pain.

Photographs will be taken at each visit, all indices will be recorded by a calibrated examiner, and oral hygiene instructions will be reinforced at each visit.

The trial will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines. Approval has been granted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Jordan University of Science and Technology. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. Adverse events will be documented, monitored, and reported according to IRB requirements.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

7

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • Jordan
      • Irbid, Jordan, Jordânia, 22110
        • Jordan University of Science and Technology

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Periodontally and systemically healthy;
  • Good plaque control (FMPS < 20%)
  • Presence of two quadrants exhibiting multiple (2 or more sites) adjacent RT1 or RT2 gingival recession ≥ 2 mm in at least one site.
  • Non-smoker.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoking
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • Untreated periodontitis;
  • Systemic disorders with compromised healing potential;
  • Use of medications (immuno-suppressants, phenytoin, or anything else that might affect soft tissue healing);
  • Undergoing radiotherapy;
  • History of mucogingival surgery.
  • Presence of severe tooth malposition, rotation, or super-eruption.
  • Presence of root caries or inadequate prosthetic restorations;
  • Persistence of uncorrected gingival trauma from toothbrushing.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Dobro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Test: V-Reverse Suture
Coronally advanced tunnel with V-reverse suture.

The V-reverse suturing technique can be a valid technique for improving graft and flap stability in the midfacial region which is likely the most crucial area that should be firm for achieving complete root coverage following the tunnel approach.

The V-reverse suture starts in the palatal aspect, passing below the splinted contact point. Then the needle engages the graft and the flap (from inside to outside) ≈3 mm apical to the soft tissue margin in the mid-facial area. Then the needle passes to the palatal side under the contact point. Then the needle turns one round around the splinted composite (without pinching the soft tissue), and then the knot is performed and tightened over the composite. At the end, the sutures form a V-reverse shape

Comparador Ativo: Control: Anchored Sling Suture
Coronally advanced tunnel with anchored sling suture
In addition to interrupted sutures, sling sutures have also regularly been applied as a conventional method of suturing to advance periodontal flaps over exposed root surfaces and connect the papillae to the interdental connective tissues, and composite stops where added to provide better stability.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
mean root coverage percentage
Prazo: 3 months
It represents the average percentage of the initial recession depth that has been successfully covered by new gum tissue over a defined period.
3 months
root coverage esthetic score
Prazo: 3 months
(RES) is a, 10-point, five-variable system developed by Cairo et al. (2009) to objectively evaluate the success of gingival recession treatment. It evaluates root coverage (60% weight, 0-6 points) and four soft tissue parameters: margin contour, tissue texture, junction alignment, and color (40% weight, 1 point each).
3 months

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Percentage of complete root coverage
Prazo: 3 months
a periodontal surgical outcome where the gingival margin is repositioned to the level of, or coronal to, the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), completely covering previously exposed root surfaces
3 months
change in keratinized tissue width
Prazo: at baseline and 3 months
Measured as the distance from gingival margin to mucogingival junction (MGJ) using a periodontal probe (UNC15).
at baseline and 3 months
change in gingival thickness
Prazo: at baseline and at 3 months
Probe visibility technique was used, by inserting a periodontal probe (UNC15) in mid-facial aspect of the tooth, and thin gingival biotype is defined as ≤ 1mm (visible probe), while thick is > 1mm (invisible probe).
at baseline and at 3 months
change in recession depth
Prazo: at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Measured as the distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and gingival margin using a periodontal probe (UNC15).
at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Patient reported experience measures (PREMs)
Prazo: For 14 days after surgery
were assessed using validated translations of the OHIP-14 questionnaire into the native language of all participants. Patients were instructed to use a postoperative diary for the first 14 days after the surgery to capture patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The diary was designed to assess patient recovery in four main areas: post-surgery sequelae, pain and discomfort, oral function, interference with daily activities.
For 14 days after surgery
change in probing depth
Prazo: at baseline and 3 months
Measured as the distance from the gingival margin to the base of the pocket using a periodontal probe (UNC15).
at baseline and 3 months
Patient satisfaction score
Prazo: day one, 1week, 2weeks, 1 month, 3months after surgery
Visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- very dissatisfied, 0- very satisfied) at each visit after surgery was taken to assess patients overall satisfaction.
day one, 1week, 2weeks, 1 month, 3months after surgery
Patient perception of pain score
Prazo: day one, 1 week, 2 weeks following surgery
Visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- worst pain, 0- no pain) to assess patients perceptions of pain.
day one, 1 week, 2 weeks following surgery

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Investigadores

  • Cadeira de estudo: Reem Abdel-Hafez, Jordan University of Science and Technology

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

1 de abril de 2025

Conclusão Primária (Real)

23 de março de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de junho de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

3 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

18 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

22 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

22 de maio de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

18 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

We plan to share de-identified individual participant data (IPD) including demographics, primary and secondary outcome measures, and adverse events. Data will be made available beginning 12 months after publication of the primary results, and will be accessible to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to data-sharing agreements and IRB approval.

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

12 months after publication of primary results and will remain available for 5 years via a controlled access repository upon request and data use agreement.

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

Qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions, healthcare organizations, or nonprofit research centers will be able to request access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents, including the Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), and Analytic Code.

Requests for access will be reviewed by the study sponsor or data access committee to ensure appropriate use and ethical standards.

Approved users will receive access via a secure online data repository, after signing a data use agreement that outlines terms of use, privacy protections, and publication rights.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • SEIVA
  • CIF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Ensaios clínicos em coronally advanced tunnel with v-reverse suture

Se inscrever