Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

V-Reverse Suture Technique Compared to Traditional Anchored Sling Suture in Treating Multiple Gingival Recession

18. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: Reem Abdel-Hafez, King Abdullah University Hospital

Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel for Root Coverage With Sling Suture VS. V-Reverse Suture: A Slit-Mouth Pilot Study

The goal of this split-mouth pilot study is to study the effect of two different suturing techniques in root coverage using coronally advanced flap tunnel in multiple adjacent recession cases to see which technique will give superior outcomes in term of mean root coverage percentage, and root coverage esthetic score after 3-months.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does a suturing technique gives superior mean root coverage percentage over another?
  • Does a suturing technique gives superior root coverage esthetic score?

Researcher will compare between V-reverse suturing technique and anchored sling suture to see which will result in superior mean root coverage percentage, and root coverage esthetic score after 3-months.

Participants will:

  • Come in for a first visit to check your gum health, check eligibility and to be provided with scaling and polishing if needed.
  • Come in for surgery and clinical measurements.
  • Participant will be asked to complete post-operative questionnaire for 14 days.
  • Re-evaluated after 1 week and suture removal at 2 weeks.
  • Follow-up after 1 and 3 months.

Studienübersicht

Status

Aktiv, nicht rekrutierend

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

This split-moth pilot study is designed to assess the comparative effectiveness of V-reverse suturing technique(test) and anchored sling suturing technique (Control) in patients with bilateral multiple adjacent gingival recession. The primary aim of the study is to compare the test and control groups in terms of the obtained mean root coverage (mRC) and Root coverage esthetic score (RES) in 3 months. The secondary aims are to compare the two groups in terms of Complete root coverage (CRC), Keratinized tissue width (KTW), Gingival thickness (GT), Recession depth (REC), Probing depth (PD), and Patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction.

At surgery day (T0) baseline measurements and photographs will be taken for all participants and they will be treated with coronally advanced tunnel with autogenous connective tissue graft harvested from the palate for both sides. Each side will be randomly allocated for either V-reverse suturing technique (test) or anchored sling suturing technique (control) to advance the tunnel coronally. At the end of the surgery postoperative instructions will be delivered to all patients in a written and oral manner, in conjunction with a medical prescription, and post-operative questionnaire to fill for the next 14 days to capture patient-reported experience measures (PREMs).

Participants will be re-evaluated at 1 week and at 2 weeks sutures will be removed.

At (T1) 1 month after surgery the following parameters will be recorded : bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), and recession depth.

At (T2) 3 month after surgery the following parameters will be recorded : bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), recession depth, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), gingival thickness (GT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), Root coverage esthetic score (RES), mean root coverage% (mRC%), and complete root coverage(cRC "YES/NO")..

Visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- very dissatisfied, 0- very satisfied) at each visit after surgery was taken to assess patients overall satisfaction, and another visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- worst pain, 0- no pain) to assess patients perceptions of pain.

Photographs will be taken at each visit, all indices will be recorded by a calibrated examiner, and oral hygiene instructions will be reinforced at each visit.

The trial will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines. Approval has been granted by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Jordan University of Science and Technology. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. Adverse events will be documented, monitored, and reported according to IRB requirements.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

7

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Jordanien
    • Jordan
      • Irbid, Jordan, Jordanien, 22110
        • Jordan University of Science and Technology

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Periodontally and systemically healthy;
  • Good plaque control (FMPS < 20%)
  • Presence of two quadrants exhibiting multiple (2 or more sites) adjacent RT1 or RT2 gingival recession ≥ 2 mm in at least one site.
  • Non-smoker.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoking
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • Untreated periodontitis;
  • Systemic disorders with compromised healing potential;
  • Use of medications (immuno-suppressants, phenytoin, or anything else that might affect soft tissue healing);
  • Undergoing radiotherapy;
  • History of mucogingival surgery.
  • Presence of severe tooth malposition, rotation, or super-eruption.
  • Presence of root caries or inadequate prosthetic restorations;
  • Persistence of uncorrected gingival trauma from toothbrushing.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Doppelt

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Test: V-Reverse Suture
Coronally advanced tunnel with V-reverse suture.
Verfahren: coronally advanced tunnel with v-reverse suture

The V-reverse suturing technique can be a valid technique for improving graft and flap stability in the midfacial region which is likely the most crucial area that should be firm for achieving complete root coverage following the tunnel approach.

The V-reverse suture starts in the palatal aspect, passing below the splinted contact point. Then the needle engages the graft and the flap (from inside to outside) ≈3 mm apical to the soft tissue margin in the mid-facial area. Then the needle passes to the palatal side under the contact point. Then the needle turns one round around the splinted composite (without pinching the soft tissue), and then the knot is performed and tightened over the composite. At the end, the sutures form a V-reverse shape
Aktiver Komparator: Control: Anchored Sling Suture
Coronally advanced tunnel with anchored sling suture
Verfahren: coronally advanced tunnel with anchored sling suture
In addition to interrupted sutures, sling sutures have also regularly been applied as a conventional method of suturing to advance periodontal flaps over exposed root surfaces and connect the papillae to the interdental connective tissues, and composite stops where added to provide better stability.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
mean root coverage percentage
Zeitfenster: 3 months
It represents the average percentage of the initial recession depth that has been successfully covered by new gum tissue over a defined period.
3 months
root coverage esthetic score
Zeitfenster: 3 months
(RES) is a, 10-point, five-variable system developed by Cairo et al. (2009) to objectively evaluate the success of gingival recession treatment. It evaluates root coverage (60% weight, 0-6 points) and four soft tissue parameters: margin contour, tissue texture, junction alignment, and color (40% weight, 1 point each).
3 months

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Percentage of complete root coverage
Zeitfenster: 3 months
a periodontal surgical outcome where the gingival margin is repositioned to the level of, or coronal to, the cementoenamel junction (CEJ), completely covering previously exposed root surfaces
3 months
change in keratinized tissue width
Zeitfenster: at baseline and 3 months
Measured as the distance from gingival margin to mucogingival junction (MGJ) using a periodontal probe (UNC15).
at baseline and 3 months
change in gingival thickness
Zeitfenster: at baseline and at 3 months
Probe visibility technique was used, by inserting a periodontal probe (UNC15) in mid-facial aspect of the tooth, and thin gingival biotype is defined as ≤ 1mm (visible probe), while thick is > 1mm (invisible probe).
at baseline and at 3 months
change in recession depth
Zeitfenster: at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Measured as the distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and gingival margin using a periodontal probe (UNC15).
at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Patient reported experience measures (PREMs)
Zeitfenster: For 14 days after surgery
were assessed using validated translations of the OHIP-14 questionnaire into the native language of all participants. Patients were instructed to use a postoperative diary for the first 14 days after the surgery to capture patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The diary was designed to assess patient recovery in four main areas: post-surgery sequelae, pain and discomfort, oral function, interference with daily activities.
For 14 days after surgery
change in probing depth
Zeitfenster: at baseline and 3 months
Measured as the distance from the gingival margin to the base of the pocket using a periodontal probe (UNC15).
at baseline and 3 months
Patient satisfaction score
Zeitfenster: day one, 1week, 2weeks, 1 month, 3months after surgery
Visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- very dissatisfied, 0- very satisfied) at each visit after surgery was taken to assess patients overall satisfaction.
day one, 1week, 2weeks, 1 month, 3months after surgery
Patient perception of pain score
Zeitfenster: day one, 1 week, 2 weeks following surgery
Visual analog scale from 0 - 10 (10- worst pain, 0- no pain) to assess patients perceptions of pain.
day one, 1 week, 2 weeks following surgery

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

King Abdullah University Hospital

Mitarbeiter

Jordan University of Science and Technology
Deanship of Scientific Research/Jordan University of Science and Technology

Ermittler

  • Studienstuhl: Reem Abdel-Hafez, Jordan University of Science and Technology

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. April 2025

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

23. März 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

1. Juni 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

3. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

18. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

22. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

22. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

18. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 20240614

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

JA

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

We plan to share de-identified individual participant data (IPD) including demographics, primary and secondary outcome measures, and adverse events. Data will be made available beginning 12 months after publication of the primary results, and will be accessible to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to data-sharing agreements and IRB approval.

IPD-Sharing-Zeitrahmen

12 months after publication of primary results and will remain available for 5 years via a controlled access repository upon request and data use agreement.

IPD-Sharing-Zugriffskriterien

Qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions, healthcare organizations, or nonprofit research centers will be able to request access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting documents, including the Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), and Analytic Code.

Requests for access will be reviewed by the study sponsor or data access committee to ensure appropriate use and ethical standards.

Approved users will receive access via a secure online data repository, after signing a data use agreement that outlines terms of use, privacy protections, and publication rights.

Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen

  • STUDIENPROTOKOLL
  • SAFT
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur coronally advanced tunnel with v-reverse suture

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Uruguay

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren