Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Luting Cements for Prefabricated Zirconia Crown Retention in Primary Anterior Teeth in Children

21 de maio de 2026 atualizado por: Murad Alrashidi

Comparison of Self-Adhesive Resin, Conventional Glass Ionomer, and Bioactive Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements for Prefabricated Zirconia Crown Retention in Primary Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the long-term clinical performance of three different luting cements used to bond prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZCs) on primary front teeth in young children. The trial will determine whether any single cement offers superior retention, gum health, or marginal sealing compared to the others over a 3-year period.

Main Questions:

The study aims to answer the following:

Are conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), bioactive resin-modified glass ionomer cement (BioCem™), and self-adhesive resin cement (SARC) equivalent in retaining prefabricated zirconia crowns on primary incisors over 36 months? Do these cements differ in their effect on gingival health, plaque accumulation, or marginal discoloration around the cemented crown?

Comparison:

Researchers will compare three parallel groups of children whose primary incisors are restored with identical prefabricated zirconia crowns but cemented with one of the three different luting cements.

Participants will: Receive a clinical and radiographic dental examination at screening. Undergo placement of one or more prefabricated zirconia crowns on primary anterior teeth using their randomly assigned cement. Return to the clinic for blinded follow-up evaluations at 12, 24, and 36 months for assessment of crown retention, gingival health, plaque, and marginal staining.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

This prospective, parallel-group, three-arm, randomized controlled trial evaluates the long-term clinical performance of three commercially available luting cements when used to bond prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZCs) on primary anterior teeth in pediatric patients. Although PZCs are increasingly preferred over stainless steel crowns for anterior restorations due to their superior esthetics and biocompatibility, their retention relies entirely on the luting cement because of their passive fit and conservative preparation design. Comparative clinical evidence on cement performance in this specific anatomical and functional context remains limited.

Trial Design:

The trial is conducted at the Pediatric Dental Clinic of Qassim University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Eligible children aged 2 to 7 years requiring full-coverage restoration of one or more primary incisors are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three cement groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Allocation labels are reshuffled after each assignment to preserve equal group sizes. An independent outcome assessor is blinded to group allocation throughout the trial, and standardized cheek retractors are used to mask cement margins during evaluations. Operators cannot be blinded due to material-specific application protocols.

Intervention Protocols:

Tooth preparation follows standardized anterior-specific minimal reduction principles (1.0-1.5 mm incisal, 0.5-0.8 mm uniform labial, feather-edge proximal margins) under rubber dam isolation. NuSmile® prefabricated zirconia crowns are used for all participants. Cement application follows manufacturer instructions for each group:

Group 1 (GIC): Fuji IX GP Extra (GC America) - tooth conditioned with 20% polyacrylic acid for 20 seconds, rinsed, gently air-dried; cement hand-mixed, loaded into crown, seated under finger pressure for 3 minutes.

Group 2 (BioCem™): BioCem™ Universal BioActive Cement (NuSmile®) - tooth cleaned with pumice and water, rinsed, dried; cement auto-mixed into crown, seated, briefly light-cured (2-3 s) for excess removal, then fully light-cured 20 s per surface.

Group 3 (SARC): RelyX™ Universal Resin Cement (3M) - tooth cleaned with pumice and water, rinsed, dried; cement loaded, crown seated, tack-cured 2-3 s, excess removed, full light-curing 20 s per surface.

All crowns are placed by a single calibrated pediatric dentist. Post-cementation periapical radiographs verify marginal integrity. Parents receive standardized oral hygiene instructions and a 7-day course of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash.

Follow-Up and Safety:

Clinical evaluations occur at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months. Retention is assessed by visual/tactile examination with a sharp explorer and LED transillumination (DEXIS CariVu®). Failed crowns are recemented and excluded from subsequent analyses. Adverse events including soft-tissue irritation, crown fracture, debonding, and aspiration risk are continuously recorded.

Statistical Methodology:

Sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1.9.7 assuming a medium effect size (f = 0.25) for ANOVA, 90% power, and α = 0.05, yielding 28 participants per group; this was inflated to 40 per group (total 120) to accommodate an anticipated 30% attrition over 36 months. The primary retention outcome will be analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with between-group comparison using the log-rank test, supplemented by Fisher's exact test for proportional retention and Cox proportional hazards regression for hazard ratios. Gingival Index and Plaque Index will be compared between groups by one-way ANOVA and within groups by repeated-measures ANOVA. Margin discoloration distribution will be compared by chi-square (with Cramér's V as effect size) and within-group transitions by McNemar's test. Significance is set at p < 0.05. Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat principle, with per-protocol sensitivity analyses.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

120

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Locais de estudo

    • Al-Qassim Region
      • Buraidah, Al-Qassim Region, Arábia Saudita, 52571
        • Qassim University
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Filho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Sim

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy children aged 2 to 7 years
  2. One or more primary maxillary or mandibular incisors requiring full-coverage restoration due to caries or trauma
  3. Adequate remaining tooth structure following preparation, defined as greater than 50% of the clinical crown
  4. Parent or legal guardian able and willing to provide written informed consent and to commit to the 36-month follow-up schedule

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active periodontal disease at the index tooth, defined as a Löe Gingival Index score of 2 or higher
  2. Parafunctional habits such as bruxism, severe thumb-sucking, or tongue-thrust documented at screening
  3. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to zirconia, resin, glass ionomer, or any component of the assigned cement
  4. Inconsistent oral hygiene, defined as less than twice-daily toothbrushing per parental report
  5. Systemic disease affecting bone metabolism, tooth development, or wound healing
  6. Current participation in another interventional dental clinical trial

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Group
Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Group: Participants receive a NuSmile® prefabricated zirconia crown cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GP Extra, GC America) following a standardized polyacrylic-acid-conditioning protocol.
Cementation with Fuji IX GP Extra Glass Ionomer Cement Hand-mixed conventional glass ionomer luting cement applied per manufacturer protocol; crown seated under finger pressure for 3 minutes; excess removed after initial set.
Experimental: Bioactive Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (BioCem™) Group
Bioactive Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (BioCem™) Group: Participants receive an identical NuSmile® prefabricated zirconia crown cemented with BioCem™ Universal BioActive Cement (NuSmile®, Houston, TX, USA).
Cementation with BioCem™ Universal BioActive Cement Auto-mixed bioactive resin-modified luting cement applied per manufacturer protocol; brief tack-cure to facilitate excess removal followed by full light-curing for 20 seconds per surface.
Experimental: Self-Adhesive Resin Cement (SARC) Group
Self-Adhesive Resin Cement (SARC) Group: Participants receive an identical NuSmile® prefabricated zirconia crown cemented with RelyX™ Universal Resin Cement (3M).
Cementation with RelyX™ Universal Resin Cement Self-adhesive dual-cure resin luting cement applied per manufacturer protocol; tack-cured for 2-3 seconds for excess removal, followed by full light-curing for 20 seconds per surface.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Crown Retention (Survival)
Prazo: Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation
The primary outcome is the cumulative retention of prefabricated zirconia crowns over a 36-month follow-up period. Retention is assessed by a single blinded examiner at each scheduled visit using two complementary methods: (a) visual/tactile inspection with a sharp dental explorer applied circumferentially along the crown margin to detect dislodgement, mobility, or marginal gap; and (b) LED transillumination using the DEXIS CariVu® system to detect cracks, debonding, or marginal microleakage. A crown is classified as "failed" (debonded) if any complete loss of cement seal, dislodgement, or detectable marginal gap is observed. Retention is reported as the proportion of crowns surviving at each time point and as the time-to-failure for survival analysis. Higher retention proportions and longer survival times indicate better clinical performance.
Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Plaque Accumulation Measured by the Silness & Löe Plaque Index (1964)
Prazo: Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation
Plaque accumulation at the gingival margin of each cemented crown is assessed using the Silness & Löe Plaque Index. The same four sites per tooth (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual) are scored by a blinded examiner on a 4-point ordinal scale: 0 = no plaque; 1 = a film of plaque adhering to the free gingival margin, recognizable only by running a probe across the surface; 2 = moderate accumulation of soft deposits visible to the naked eye; 3 = abundance of soft matter. A mean PI score is calculated per tooth and per participant; the participant-level mean ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 3, with higher scores indicating greater plaque accumulation.
Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation
Gingival Health Measured by the Löe Gingival Index (1967)
Prazo: Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation
Gingival inflammation around each cemented crown is assessed at baseline and at every follow-up visit using the Löe Gingival Index (1967). A single blinded examiner scores four gingival sites per tooth (mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual) on a 4-point ordinal scale: 0 = no clinical inflammation (normal gingiva); 1 = mild inflammation (slight color change, slight edema, no bleeding on probing); 2 = moderate inflammation (redness, edema, glazing, bleeding on probing); 3 = severe inflammation (marked redness and edema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding). A mean GI score is calculated per tooth and per participant; the participant-level mean therefore ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 3, with higher scores indicating worse gingival health.
Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation
Marginal Discoloration Measured by the Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) Criteria
Prazo: Baseline (immediately post-cementation), 12, 24, and 36 months
Discoloration at the crown-tooth interface is evaluated under standardized LED operatory lighting (1,000-1,400 lux) without magnification using the modified USPHS criteria, supplemented by high-resolution intraoral photography with cross-polarized filters. Each crown is assigned one of four ordinal ratings: Alpha (A) = no visible discoloration (best outcome); Bravo (B) = slight discoloration confined to the margin, not penetrating internally; Charlie (C) = obvious discoloration penetrating along the margin; Delta (D) = severe discoloration with secondary caries or restoration failure (worst outcome). The outcome is reported as the proportion of crowns in each category at each time point, with a higher proportion of Alpha ratings indicating better marginal integrity.
Baseline (immediately post-cementation), 12, 24, and 36 months

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events
Prazo: Continuously, from cementation through 36 months
The frequency, type, and severity of all adverse events occurring during the 36-month follow-up will be recorded for each arm. Events of interest include crown debonding, crown fracture, soft-tissue irritation or ulceration adjacent to the crown margin, allergic reaction to cement components, secondary caries, and pulpal complications. Severity will be classified using a three-tier framework adapted from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) approach: Mild (Grade 1) - no intervention required; Moderate (Grade 2) - non-urgent intervention required (e.g., recementation at a scheduled visit); Severe (Grade 3) - urgent intervention, crown replacement, or treatment of secondary pathology required. The primary safety endpoint is the incidence rate (events per participant per year of follow-up) in each arm.
Continuously, from cementation through 36 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: MURAD ALRASHIDI, BDS, MSC, Qassim University

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de maio de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de junho de 2029

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de julho de 2029

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

21 de maio de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

21 de maio de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

28 de maio de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

28 de maio de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

21 de maio de 2026

Última verificação

1 de maio de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

SIM

Descrição do plano IPD

The investigators will share de-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the final publication. Shared data may include retention status at each time point, time-to-failure, Gingival Index and Plaque Index scores, USPHS marginal discoloration ratings, and adverse event records. The study protocol and statistical analysis plan will also be made available.

Prazo de Compartilhamento de IPD

Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

Critérios de acesso de compartilhamento IPD

Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and whose intended use has been approved by an independent review committee. Proposals should be directed to the primary investigator. To gain access, requestors must sign a data access agreement.

Tipo de informação de suporte de compartilhamento de IPD

  • PROTOCOLO DE ESTUDO
  • SEIVA
  • CIF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever