Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Luting Cements for Prefabricated Zirconia Crown Retention in Primary Anterior Teeth in Children

21 maggio 2026 aggiornato da: Murad Alrashidi

Comparison of Self-Adhesive Resin, Conventional Glass Ionomer, and Bioactive Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements for Prefabricated Zirconia Crown Retention in Primary Anterior Teeth: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the long-term clinical performance of three different luting cements used to bond prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZCs) on primary front teeth in young children. The trial will determine whether any single cement offers superior retention, gum health, or marginal sealing compared to the others over a 3-year period.

Main Questions:

The study aims to answer the following:

Are conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC), bioactive resin-modified glass ionomer cement (BioCem™), and self-adhesive resin cement (SARC) equivalent in retaining prefabricated zirconia crowns on primary incisors over 36 months? Do these cements differ in their effect on gingival health, plaque accumulation, or marginal discoloration around the cemented crown?

Comparison:

Researchers will compare three parallel groups of children whose primary incisors are restored with identical prefabricated zirconia crowns but cemented with one of the three different luting cements.

Participants will: Receive a clinical and radiographic dental examination at screening. Undergo placement of one or more prefabricated zirconia crowns on primary anterior teeth using their randomly assigned cement. Return to the clinic for blinded follow-up evaluations at 12, 24, and 36 months for assessment of crown retention, gingival health, plaque, and marginal staining.

Panoramica dello studio

Descrizione dettagliata

This prospective, parallel-group, three-arm, randomized controlled trial evaluates the long-term clinical performance of three commercially available luting cements when used to bond prefabricated zirconia crowns (PZCs) on primary anterior teeth in pediatric patients. Although PZCs are increasingly preferred over stainless steel crowns for anterior restorations due to their superior esthetics and biocompatibility, their retention relies entirely on the luting cement because of their passive fit and conservative preparation design. Comparative clinical evidence on cement performance in this specific anatomical and functional context remains limited.

Trial Design:

The trial is conducted at the Pediatric Dental Clinic of Qassim University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Eligible children aged 2 to 7 years requiring full-coverage restoration of one or more primary incisors are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three cement groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Allocation labels are reshuffled after each assignment to preserve equal group sizes. An independent outcome assessor is blinded to group allocation throughout the trial, and standardized cheek retractors are used to mask cement margins during evaluations. Operators cannot be blinded due to material-specific application protocols.

Intervention Protocols:

Tooth preparation follows standardized anterior-specific minimal reduction principles (1.0-1.5 mm incisal, 0.5-0.8 mm uniform labial, feather-edge proximal margins) under rubber dam isolation. NuSmile® prefabricated zirconia crowns are used for all participants. Cement application follows manufacturer instructions for each group:

Group 1 (GIC): Fuji IX GP Extra (GC America) - tooth conditioned with 20% polyacrylic acid for 20 seconds, rinsed, gently air-dried; cement hand-mixed, loaded into crown, seated under finger pressure for 3 minutes.

Group 2 (BioCem™): BioCem™ Universal BioActive Cement (NuSmile®) - tooth cleaned with pumice and water, rinsed, dried; cement auto-mixed into crown, seated, briefly light-cured (2-3 s) for excess removal, then fully light-cured 20 s per surface.

Group 3 (SARC): RelyX™ Universal Resin Cement (3M) - tooth cleaned with pumice and water, rinsed, dried; cement loaded, crown seated, tack-cured 2-3 s, excess removed, full light-curing 20 s per surface.

All crowns are placed by a single calibrated pediatric dentist. Post-cementation periapical radiographs verify marginal integrity. Parents receive standardized oral hygiene instructions and a 7-day course of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash.

Follow-Up and Safety:

Clinical evaluations occur at baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months. Retention is assessed by visual/tactile examination with a sharp explorer and LED transillumination (DEXIS CariVu®). Failed crowns are recemented and excluded from subsequent analyses. Adverse events including soft-tissue irritation, crown fracture, debonding, and aspiration risk are continuously recorded.

Statistical Methodology:

Sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1.9.7 assuming a medium effect size (f = 0.25) for ANOVA, 90% power, and α = 0.05, yielding 28 participants per group; this was inflated to 40 per group (total 120) to accommodate an anticipated 30% attrition over 36 months. The primary retention outcome will be analyzed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with between-group comparison using the log-rank test, supplemented by Fisher's exact test for proportional retention and Cox proportional hazards regression for hazard ratios. Gingival Index and Plaque Index will be compared between groups by one-way ANOVA and within groups by repeated-measures ANOVA. Margin discoloration distribution will be compared by chi-square (with Cramér's V as effect size) and within-group transitions by McNemar's test. Significance is set at p < 0.05. Analyses will follow an intention-to-treat principle, with per-protocol sensitivity analyses.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Stimato)

120

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

Luoghi di studio

    • Al-Qassim Region
      • Buraidah, Al-Qassim Region, Arabia Saudita, 52571
        • Qassim University
        • Contatto:

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

  • Bambino

Accetta volontari sani

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy children aged 2 to 7 years
  2. One or more primary maxillary or mandibular incisors requiring full-coverage restoration due to caries or trauma
  3. Adequate remaining tooth structure following preparation, defined as greater than 50% of the clinical crown
  4. Parent or legal guardian able and willing to provide written informed consent and to commit to the 36-month follow-up schedule

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active periodontal disease at the index tooth, defined as a Löe Gingival Index score of 2 or higher
  2. Parafunctional habits such as bruxism, severe thumb-sucking, or tongue-thrust documented at screening
  3. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to zirconia, resin, glass ionomer, or any component of the assigned cement
  4. Inconsistent oral hygiene, defined as less than twice-daily toothbrushing per parental report
  5. Systemic disease affecting bone metabolism, tooth development, or wound healing
  6. Current participation in another interventional dental clinical trial

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Separare

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Comparatore attivo: Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Group
Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) Group: Participants receive a NuSmile® prefabricated zirconia crown cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX GP Extra, GC America) following a standardized polyacrylic-acid-conditioning protocol.
Cementation with Fuji IX GP Extra Glass Ionomer Cement Hand-mixed conventional glass ionomer luting cement applied per manufacturer protocol; crown seated under finger pressure for 3 minutes; excess removed after initial set.
Sperimentale: Bioactive Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (BioCem™) Group
Bioactive Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (BioCem™) Group: Participants receive an identical NuSmile® prefabricated zirconia crown cemented with BioCem™ Universal BioActive Cement (NuSmile®, Houston, TX, USA).
Cementation with BioCem™ Universal BioActive Cement Auto-mixed bioactive resin-modified luting cement applied per manufacturer protocol; brief tack-cure to facilitate excess removal followed by full light-curing for 20 seconds per surface.
Sperimentale: Self-Adhesive Resin Cement (SARC) Group
Self-Adhesive Resin Cement (SARC) Group: Participants receive an identical NuSmile® prefabricated zirconia crown cemented with RelyX™ Universal Resin Cement (3M).
Cementation with RelyX™ Universal Resin Cement Self-adhesive dual-cure resin luting cement applied per manufacturer protocol; tack-cured for 2-3 seconds for excess removal, followed by full light-curing for 20 seconds per surface.

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Crown Retention (Survival)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation
The primary outcome is the cumulative retention of prefabricated zirconia crowns over a 36-month follow-up period. Retention is assessed by a single blinded examiner at each scheduled visit using two complementary methods: (a) visual/tactile inspection with a sharp dental explorer applied circumferentially along the crown margin to detect dislodgement, mobility, or marginal gap; and (b) LED transillumination using the DEXIS CariVu® system to detect cracks, debonding, or marginal microleakage. A crown is classified as "failed" (debonded) if any complete loss of cement seal, dislodgement, or detectable marginal gap is observed. Retention is reported as the proportion of crowns surviving at each time point and as the time-to-failure for survival analysis. Higher retention proportions and longer survival times indicate better clinical performance.
Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation

Misure di risultato secondarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Plaque Accumulation Measured by the Silness & Löe Plaque Index (1964)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation
Plaque accumulation at the gingival margin of each cemented crown is assessed using the Silness & Löe Plaque Index. The same four sites per tooth (mesial, distal, buccal, lingual) are scored by a blinded examiner on a 4-point ordinal scale: 0 = no plaque; 1 = a film of plaque adhering to the free gingival margin, recognizable only by running a probe across the surface; 2 = moderate accumulation of soft deposits visible to the naked eye; 3 = abundance of soft matter. A mean PI score is calculated per tooth and per participant; the participant-level mean ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 3, with higher scores indicating greater plaque accumulation.
Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation
Gingival Health Measured by the Löe Gingival Index (1967)
Lasso di tempo: Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation
Gingival inflammation around each cemented crown is assessed at baseline and at every follow-up visit using the Löe Gingival Index (1967). A single blinded examiner scores four gingival sites per tooth (mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual) on a 4-point ordinal scale: 0 = no clinical inflammation (normal gingiva); 1 = mild inflammation (slight color change, slight edema, no bleeding on probing); 2 = moderate inflammation (redness, edema, glazing, bleeding on probing); 3 = severe inflammation (marked redness and edema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding). A mean GI score is calculated per tooth and per participant; the participant-level mean therefore ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 3, with higher scores indicating worse gingival health.
Baseline, 12, 24, and 36 months post-cementation
Marginal Discoloration Measured by the Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) Criteria
Lasso di tempo: Baseline (immediately post-cementation), 12, 24, and 36 months
Discoloration at the crown-tooth interface is evaluated under standardized LED operatory lighting (1,000-1,400 lux) without magnification using the modified USPHS criteria, supplemented by high-resolution intraoral photography with cross-polarized filters. Each crown is assigned one of four ordinal ratings: Alpha (A) = no visible discoloration (best outcome); Bravo (B) = slight discoloration confined to the margin, not penetrating internally; Charlie (C) = obvious discoloration penetrating along the margin; Delta (D) = severe discoloration with secondary caries or restoration failure (worst outcome). The outcome is reported as the proportion of crowns in each category at each time point, with a higher proportion of Alpha ratings indicating better marginal integrity.
Baseline (immediately post-cementation), 12, 24, and 36 months

Altre misure di risultato

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events
Lasso di tempo: Continuously, from cementation through 36 months
The frequency, type, and severity of all adverse events occurring during the 36-month follow-up will be recorded for each arm. Events of interest include crown debonding, crown fracture, soft-tissue irritation or ulceration adjacent to the crown margin, allergic reaction to cement components, secondary caries, and pulpal complications. Severity will be classified using a three-tier framework adapted from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) approach: Mild (Grade 1) - no intervention required; Moderate (Grade 2) - non-urgent intervention required (e.g., recementation at a scheduled visit); Severe (Grade 3) - urgent intervention, crown replacement, or treatment of secondary pathology required. The primary safety endpoint is the incidence rate (events per participant per year of follow-up) in each arm.
Continuously, from cementation through 36 months

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Sponsor

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: MURAD ALRASHIDI, BDS, MSC, Qassim University

Pubblicazioni e link utili

La persona responsabile dell'inserimento delle informazioni sullo studio fornisce volontariamente queste pubblicazioni. Questi possono riguardare qualsiasi cosa relativa allo studio.

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Stimato)

1 maggio 2026

Completamento primario (Stimato)

1 giugno 2029

Completamento dello studio (Stimato)

1 luglio 2029

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

21 maggio 2026

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

21 maggio 2026

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

28 maggio 2026

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

28 maggio 2026

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

21 maggio 2026

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2026

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

Descrizione del piano IPD

The investigators will share de-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the final publication. Shared data may include retention status at each time point, time-to-failure, Gingival Index and Plaque Index scores, USPHS marginal discoloration ratings, and adverse event records. The study protocol and statistical analysis plan will also be made available.

Periodo di condivisione IPD

Data will be available beginning 6 months and ending 36 months following article publication.

Criteri di accesso alla condivisione IPD

Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and whose intended use has been approved by an independent review committee. Proposals should be directed to the primary investigator. To gain access, requestors must sign a data access agreement.

Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD

  • STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
  • LINFA
  • ICF
  • CODICE_ANALITICO
  • RSI

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Carie dentale

Prove cliniche su Cementation with Fuji IX GP Extra Glass Ionomer Cement

Sottoscrivi