Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Effects of Ecologically Valid VR Task-Oriented Exercises on Post-Stroke Motor and Cognitive Function (RECOVER)

26 de junho de 2026 atualizado por: Hospitales Nisa

Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-based Task-oriented Exercises in Ecologically Valid Environments on Motor and Cognitive Function in Individuals Post-stroke. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Why is this study being done?

After a stroke, many people have problems with movement, such as walking, balance, and using their arms and hands. They may also experience difficulties with thinking skills, including attention, memory, and problem-solving. These movement and thinking abilities work closely together during everyday activities, such as preparing a meal, shopping, or moving safely through the home.

Traditional rehabilitation often treats movement and thinking problems separately. However, difficulties with attention, planning, and decision-making can affect a person's ability to move safely and learn new motor skills. Because of this, rehabilitation approaches that train both movement and thinking skills at the same time may provide greater benefits.

Virtual reality (VR) technology can create realistic, interactive environments that allow people to practice everyday activities in a safe setting. However, there is limited research on VR programs that simultaneously challenge both movement and thinking skills, and little is known about whether any benefits last over time.

What is the purpose of this study?

The purpose of this study is to compare a virtual reality-based rehabilitation program that combines movement and cognitive training in realistic everyday environments with conventional occupational therapy. The study will evaluate whether the VR program leads to greater improvements in motor function and cognitive function after stroke and whether these improvements are maintained over the long term.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Stroke causes long-term disability through interconnected motor deficits (affecting balance, gait, and upper limbs) and cognitive impairments (disrupting attention, memory, and executive functions). Although these domains are traditionally treated through separate physical and neuropsychological rehabilitation pathways, post-stroke motor performance heavily depends on the cognitive processes required to plan movements and allocate attentional resources. Consequently, patients often experience cognitive-motor interference during daily activities, and cognitive deficits can actively hinder motor learning and recovery. Despite this crucial interaction, virtual reality (VR) interventions that simultaneously target both motor and cognitive demands within ecologically valid environments remain scarce, and literature regarding the long-term maintenance of their benefits is limited. Based on this gap, the study hypothesizes that an ecologically valid, dual-demand VR intervention will outperform conventional occupational therapy in improving both motor and cognitive outcomes, aiming to evaluate and compare their immediate effects and long-term therapeutic gains.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

28

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

      • Valencia, Espanha
        • IRENEA. Instituto de Rehabilitación Neurológica

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of stroke confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
  • Chronicity > six months
  • Ausence of severe cognitive deficits (Mini-Mental State Examination > 23)
  • Ability to stand safely and without assistance
  • No or minimal muscle tone (Modified Ashworth Scale < 3).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe visual or hearing deficits
  • Unilateral spatial neglect
  • Ataxia
  • Orthopedic abnormalities
  • Lower limb pain syndrome or peripheral nerve injury affecting the lower limbs.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Dobro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: Control
Conventional occupational therapy
Each session consists of three components. The first component includes preparatory activities designed to improve function of the affected upper limb. The second component focuses on fine motor skill training through exercises targeting reaching, grasping, object manipulation, and movements across the body's midline. The third component addresses individual motor and cognitive impairments through the practice of Basic Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, as well as structured problem-solving tasks related to everyday situations.
Experimental: Experimental
Combined virtual reality-based exercises and conventional occupational therapy
Each session consists of three components. The first component includes preparatory activities designed to improve function of the affected upper limb. The second component focuses on fine motor skill training through exercises targeting reaching, grasping, object manipulation, and movements across the body's midline. The third component addresses individual motor and cognitive impairments through the practice of Basic Activities of Daily Living and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, as well as structured problem-solving tasks related to everyday situations.

The intervention consists of interactive video games to train activities of daily living in a customizable digital version of the participant's own kitchen.

During training, participants control a sex-matched avatar that reflects their real-time movements. They interact with common kitchen objects while practicing tasks that target both motor abilities, such as balance, posture, and hand-eye coordination, and cognitive abilities, such as attention, memory, planning, and problem-solving.

The system can use photographs of the participant's home kitchen to create a familiar and realistic virtual environment. This approach is intended to support the transfer of skills practiced during therapy to the participant's everyday activities at home.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Berg Balance Scale
Prazo: From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention

Change in the balance of the Berg Balance Scale from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to follow-up.

The Berg Balance Scale is a clinical tool that assesses a person's static and dynamic balance to determine their risk of falling. It is primarily used for older adults and patients with neurological or motor disorders. Score range 0-54

From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Functional Reaches Test
Prazo: From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention

Change in the Functional Reaches Test from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to follow-up.

The Functional Reach Test measures a person's dynamic balance and stability limits while standing. It specifically assesses the maximum distance a patient can reach forward with an outstretched arm without taking a step or losing balance. Score range: NA

From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Change in Four Square Step Test
Prazo: From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Change in the seconds of the Four Square Step Test from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to follow-up. The Four Square Step Test (FSST) is a performance-based assessment that evaluates dynamic balance, mobility, and the ability to change direction while walking. During the test, participants step as quickly as possible in a specific sequence through four squares formed by low obstacles on the floor, moving forward, backward, and sideways. The test measures the time required to complete the sequence and assesses balance control, coordination, agility, and the ability to safely negotiate obstacles during movement. It is commonly used to identify mobility limitations and fall risk in individuals with neurological conditions, including stroke. Score range: NA
From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Change in the 10-meters walk Test
Prazo: From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Change in the 10-meters walk Test from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to follow-up. The 10-Meter Walk Test measures walking speed in meters per second (m/s). It assesses functional mobility, independence, and frailty by recording the time it takes a patient to walk a short distance (typically the central 6- or 8-meter section of a 10- to 14-meter corridor). Score range: NA
From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Change in the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale
Prazo: From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Change in the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to follow-up. The Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale is a questionnaire that assesses a person's confidence in maintaining balance and avoiding falls while performing 16 everyday activities. Score range: 0-100.
From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Change in the Conner's Continuous Performance Test III
Prazo: From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Change in the Conner's Continuous Performance Test III from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to follow-up. The Conners Continuous Performance Test is a computerized neuropsychological test that assesses sustained attention, vigilance, inhibitory control (impulsivity), and selective attention. Score range: NA
From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Changes in the Spatial Span Test
Prazo: From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Changes in the Spatial Span Test from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to follow-up. The Spatial Span Test measures visuospatial short-term memory and visual working memory capacity. Score ranges: 0-9
From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Changes in the Trail Making Test
Prazo: From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention
Changes in the seconds of part A and part B for Trail Making Test from baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to follow-up. The Trail Making Test is designed to assess attention, processing speed, cognitive flexibility, and executive functions. It consists of two parts (A and B) in which the patient must connect numbered or lettered circles as quickly as posible. Score Range: 0-300 s
From baseline to the end of the intervention and from the end of the intervention to one-month after the intervention

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Roberto Llorens, PhD, Universitat Politecnica de Valencia

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Links úteis

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Real)

16 de fevereiro de 2023

Conclusão Primária (Real)

9 de outubro de 2025

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

9 de outubro de 2025

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

18 de junho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

26 de junho de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

2 de julho de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

2 de julho de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

26 de junho de 2026

Última verificação

1 de junho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • P0524032022
  • PID2022-141498OA-I00 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación)
  • RTC2019-006933-7 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación)
  • INREIA/2024/73 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: Conselleria d'Innovació, Indústria, Comerç i Turisme)
  • CIDEXG/2022/15 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: Conselleria d'Innovació, Universitats, Ciència i Societat Digital of Generalitat Valenciana)
  • 60/2023 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: Fundació la Marató de la TV3)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Descrição do plano IPD

IPD available upon reasonable request

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever