Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Effect of Cervical Force Control Training on Force Sense and Steadiness in Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain

9 de setembro de 2026 atualizado por: Mohamed Mahmoud Refaey, Cairo University

Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) is a very common issue among young adults, often linked to poor posture, prolonged screen time, and sedentary habits. This persistent pain can change how the neck muscles work and control movement. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether a specific type of rehabilitation-called "cervical force control training"-can help improve how well people can feel and control their neck muscle strength, and whether this reduces their pain and improves their daily function.

Researchers will invite young adults (18 to 24 years old) who have had neck pain for at least 3 months to participate. Participants will be randomly divided into two groups:

Force Control Training Group: Will receive a new training program that uses a handheld dynamometer with a screen to help them practice holding steady, precise neck muscle contractions with visual feedback.

Conventional Exercise Group: Will receive a standard physical therapy program consisting of neck muscle stretches and shoulder-blade strengthening exercises.

Both groups will perform their exercises 3 times a week for 8 weeks. Researchers will measure participants' neck muscle steadiness, pain levels, and neck disability before the program starts, right after the 8-week program ends, and again at a 3-month follow-up to evaluate the long-lasting effects.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP) involves persistent cervical pain without an identifiable structural pathology. Recent evidence suggests that CNSNP is closely associated with sensorimotor control deficits, including impaired proprioception and diminished force steadiness (the neuromuscular ability to produce and sustain precise submaximal force levels with minimal fluctuations). While conventional exercises improve strength and reduce pain, they often neglect the fine-motor precision and sensorimotor integration necessary for optimal neck function.

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) is designed to investigate the effect of cervical force control training compared to conventional neck exercises on force sense, force steadiness, pain intensity, and functional disability in young adults (18-24 years) with CNSNP.

Following baseline assessments for maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), force sense, and force steadiness (quantified by the coefficient of variation) using a Handheld Dynamometer (HHD), as well as clinical measures (VAS for pain, NDI for disability), eligible participants will be randomized into two groups:

Experimental Group (Force Control Training):

Participants will undergo an 8-week targeted training program (3 sessions/week, 30-40 mins each). The protocol utilizes submaximal isometric contractions with visual feedback via an HHD device paired with an application. The program progresses systematically through three phases: Phase 1 (Calibration & Reference at MVIC), Phase 2 (Acquisition using descending submaximal intensities 25% to 10% MVIC with continuous visual tracking), and Phase 3 (Retention & Transfer involving faded/no feedback and complex dual-tasking, such as auditory monitoring or arithmetic).

Control Group (Conventional Exercise Training):

Participants will undergo an 8-week program (3 sessions/week, 30 mins each) consisting of standard cervical stretching (upper trapezius and levator scapulae) and scapular strengthening/stabilization exercises (e.g., side-lying external rotation, side-lying forward flexion, prone extension, and push-up plus). Resistance will be tailored based on gender and body weight.

Re-evaluations will be conducted immediately post-intervention (at 8 weeks) and at a 3-month follow-up. The study aims to establish whether integrating specific force-control tasks offers superior benefits in restoring sensorimotor function and alleviating symptoms in patients with CNSNP compared to conventional rehabilitation alone.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

32

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

Estude backup de contato

Locais de estudo

    • Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate
      • Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate, Egito
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy
        • Contato:
        • Investigador principal:
          • Mohamed M Refaey, M.Sc.

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed with Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain (CNSNP) lasting >= 3 months.
  • Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 29.9 kg/m² (non-obese).
  • Pain intensity >= 30 mm on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
  • Neck disability ranging from mild to moderate (10% to 48%) on the Neck Disability Index (NDI).
  • Able to perform isometric contractions with visual feedback.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Shoulder/upper limb fractures or replacement (<12 months), or moderate-severe shoulder osteoarthritis (OA).
  • Cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy, peripheral neuropathy, vestibular disorders, or history of stroke/Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA).
  • Upper limb pathology (tendinopathy, capsulitis), thoracic outlet syndrome, or fibromyalgia.
  • Received neck-specific physiotherapy within the last 3 months.
  • Severe osteoporosis, uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c >9%), or active infection/inflammation.
  • Cervical injections or surgery within the last 6 months.
  • Inability to follow 2-step instructions.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Solteiro

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Experimental Group: Force Control Training
Patients in this group will receive an 8-week cervical force control training program (3 sessions/week). The training involves submaximal isometric neck contractions using visual feedback via a Handheld Dynamometer, progressing from simple feedback-assisted holds to complex dual-task exercises.
An 8-week program (3 sessions/week, 30-40 mins each) utilizing submaximal isometric neck contractions with visual feedback via a Handheld Dynamometer. The protocol progresses through three phases: initial calibration, acquisition using descending target intensities (25% to 10% MVIC) with continuous visual tracking, and retention/transfer using faded or no feedback combined with dual-tasking (e.g., auditory monitoring or arithmetic).
Comparador Ativo: Active Comparator: Conventional Exercise Training
Patients in this group will receive an 8-week conventional exercise program (3 sessions/week). The program includes standard cervical stretching (upper trapezius and levator scapulae) and scapular strengthening and stabilization exercises.
An 8-week program (3 sessions/week, 30 mins each) consisting of standard cervical stretching for the upper trapezius and levator scapulae muscles, alongside scapular strengthening and stabilization exercises (e.g., side-lying external rotation, side-lying forward flexion, prone extension, and push-up plus). Resistance is tailored based on patient gender and body weight.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Cervical Force Sense
Prazo: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Assessed using a Handheld Dynamometer (HHD) during force reproduction tasks. It is measured by calculating the absolute error between a target submaximal force and the reproduced force without visual feedback. Lower error values indicate better force sense and proprioception.
Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Cervical Force Steadiness
Prazo: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated by calculating the Coefficient of Variation (CoV) of force during submaximal isometric cervical contractions using a Handheld Dynamometer (HHD). Lower CoV percentages indicate better force steadiness and neuromuscular control.
Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Neck Functional Disability (Neck Disability Index - NDI)
Prazo: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
A 10-item patient-completed questionnaire assessing how neck pain affects the ability to manage everyday life activities. Total scores range from 0 to 50, which can be expressed as a percentage (0-100%). Higher scores indicate greater patient-rated functional disability.
Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale - VAS)
Prazo: Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up
Pain intensity is assessed using a 100-mm horizontal line, anchored by "no pain" at 0 mm and "worst imaginable pain" at 100 mm. Lower scores indicate a lower level of pain.
Baseline, 8 weeks (immediately post-intervention), and 3-month follow-up

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Patrocinador

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

1 de setembro de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

1 de dezembro de 2026

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

1 de dezembro de 2026

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

6 de setembro de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

6 de setembro de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

10 de setembro de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

11 de setembro de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

9 de setembro de 2026

Última verificação

1 de setembro de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

NÃO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever