Effect of Glo Germ Visual Feedback on Surgical Hand Antisepsis in Nursing Students (GLO-SHA)
Beyond Checklists: Glo Germ Feedback Improves Anatomical Surgical Hand Antisepsis
This randomized controlled study evaluated the effect of Glo Germ-based visual feedback on surgical hand antisepsis performance among undergraduate nursing students.
A total of 46 third-year nursing students enrolled in an Operating Room Nursing course were randomly assigned to an intervention group (n=23) or a control group (n=23). Both groups received theoretical instruction and conventional practical training in surgical hand antisepsis. In addition, the intervention group received individualized visual feedback using Glo Germ fluorescent training lotion and ultraviolet light to identify areas requiring improvement in hand antisepsis technique.
The primary outcome was surgical hand antisepsis skill performance. Secondary outcomes included knowledge of surgical hand antisepsis and anatomical hand cleanliness. Outcomes were evaluated at the designated assessment points, including a one-month follow-up.
The study aimed to determine whether incorporating fluorescence-based visual feedback into conventional training improves surgical hand antisepsis education among nursing students.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Surgical hand antisepsis is an essential component of infection prevention in perioperative settings. Effective surgical hand antisepsis requires both theoretical knowledge and the correct application of antisepsis procedures, including adequate coverage of anatomical hand and forearm surfaces. Traditional educational methods may not provide sufficient visual information to help students recognize areas missed during hand antisepsis.
This study was designed as a prospective, parallel-group randomized controlled educational trial to evaluate the effectiveness of Glo Germ-based visual feedback in surgical hand antisepsis training among undergraduate nursing students.
The study included 46 third-year nursing students enrolled in an Operating Room Nursing course at a university in Zonguldak, Türkiye. Participants were randomly allocated to an intervention group (n=23) or a control group (n=23) using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Allocation concealment was implemented using sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes.
Both groups received a 45-minute theoretical educational session and conventional practical instruction on surgical hand antisepsis. Students in the control group received conventional verbal feedback during practical training.
In addition to conventional training, students in the intervention group received Glo Germ-based visual feedback. A fluorescent training lotion and ultraviolet light were used to visualize anatomical areas requiring improvement. Participants received individualized feedback and repeated the hand antisepsis procedure to reinforce correct technique.
The primary outcome was surgical hand antisepsis skill performance, assessed using an 18-item observational checklist. Secondary outcomes included surgical hand antisepsis knowledge, assessed using a 15-item knowledge assessment form, and anatomical hand cleanliness, evaluated through fluorescence-based visual assessment.
Knowledge was assessed at baseline, immediately after training, and at the one-month follow-up. Skill performance was assessed immediately after training and at the one-month follow-up. Fluorescence-based anatomical cleanliness assessment was conducted at the assessment points specified in the study protocol.
Outcome assessments were performed by independent assessors who were blinded to group allocation. The study investigated whether adding individualized fluorescence-based visual feedback to conventional surgical hand antisepsis education improves students' knowledge, practical skills, and anatomical cleanliness.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
-
Zonguldak, Turquia (Türkiye), 67600
- Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
Being a third-year undergraduate nursing student enrolled in the Operating Room Nursing course.
Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study. Providing written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Having open wounds, cuts, or skin lesions on the hands that could interfere with surgical hand antisepsis procedures.
Having hand eczema or other dermatological conditions affecting the hands that could interfere with training or assessment.
Declining to participate in the study.
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Outro
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Solteiro
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Glo Germ Visual Feedback Group
Participants received a 45-minute theoretical session and conventional practical training on surgical hand antisepsis. In addition, they received individualized visual feedback using Glo Germ fluorescent training lotion and ultraviolet light to identify areas requiring improvement in hand antisepsis technique. Participants repeated the procedure following visual feedback. |
An educational intervention incorporating Glo Germ fluorescent training lotion and ultraviolet light to provide individualized visual feedback during surgical hand antisepsis training. The intervention enabled participants to identify anatomical areas requiring improvement and repeat the antisepsis procedure following feedback. |
|
Comparador Ativo: Conventional Training Group
Participants received a 45-minute theoretical session and conventional practical training on surgical hand antisepsis. Conventional verbal feedback was provided during practical training. Participants did not receive Glo Germ-based visual feedback. |
Participants received a 45-minute theoretical educational session covering the principles, importance, and correct procedures of surgical hand antisepsis. This was followed by conventional practical training, including demonstration and supervised practice of surgical hand antisepsis techniques. Verbal feedback was provided to support correct technique and improve participants' practical skills. This standard educational intervention was provided to both the experimental and control groups. |
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Hand Antisepsis Skill Performance
Prazo: Immediately after training and at 1-month follow-up
|
Surgical hand antisepsis skill performance was assessed using an 18-item observational checklist evaluating the correct execution of surgical hand antisepsis procedures. Each correctly performed step was scored as 1, and each incorrectly performed or omitted step was scored as 0. Total scores ranged from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating better surgical hand antisepsis performance. Assessments were conducted immediately after training and at the one-month follow-up. |
Immediately after training and at 1-month follow-up
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Hand Antisepsis Knowledge
Prazo: Baseline, immediately after training, and at 1-month follow-up
|
Knowledge of surgical hand antisepsis was assessed using a 15-item knowledge assessment form. Total scores ranged from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of surgical hand antisepsis. Knowledge was assessed at baseline, immediately after training, and at the one-month follow-up. |
Baseline, immediately after training, and at 1-month follow-up
|
|
Percentage of Anatomical Hand Cleanliness
Prazo: Immediately after training (intervention group only) and at 1-month follow-up (both groups)
|
Anatomical hand cleanliness was assessed using Glo Germ fluorescent training lotion and ultraviolet light. The anatomical regions of the hands and forearms were examined to identify areas with inadequate coverage during surgical hand antisepsis training. The assessment results were calculated and expressed as percentages. Higher percentages indicated better anatomical hand cleanliness. Assessments were performed immediately after training in the intervention group and at the one-month follow-up in both groups. |
Immediately after training (intervention group only) and at 1-month follow-up (both groups)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Publicações e links úteis
Publicações Gerais
- Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
- Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004 Oct;79(10 Suppl):S70-81. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022. No abstract available.
- Yilmaz R, Fazlollahi AM, Winkler-Schwartz A, Wang A, Makhani HH, Alsayegh A, Bakhaidar M, Tran DH, Santaguida C, Del Maestro RF. Effect of Feedback Modality on Simulated Surgical Skills Learning Using Automated Educational Systems- A Four-Arm Randomized Control Trial. J Surg Educ. 2024 Feb;81(2):275-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
- WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care: First Global Patient Safety Challenge Clean Care Is Safer Care. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK144013/
- Fegran L, Ten Ham-Baloyi W, Fossum M, Hovland OJ, Naidoo JR, van Rooyen DRM, Sejersted E, Robstad N. Simulation debriefing as part of simulation for clinical teaching and learning in nursing education: A scoping review. Nurs Open. 2023 Mar;10(3):1217-1233. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1426. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
- Yalcin Atar N, Koc M. The Effect of Simulation-Based Training on the Hand Hygiene Knowledge and Practices of Palliative Caregivers: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Single-Center Study. Nurs Health Sci. 2024 Sep;26(3):e13164. doi: 10.1111/nhs.13164.
- Reaves C, Martel M, Rose K. Teaching Psychomotor Skills in Undergraduate Nursing Education: An Integrative Review. J Nurs Educ. 2024 Jul;63(7):421-426. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20240505-01. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
- Purssell E, Gould D. Teaching health care students hand hygiene theory and skills: a systematic review. Int J Environ Health Res. 2022 Sep;32(9):2065-2073. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2021.1937580. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
- Mittal MK, Morris JB, Kelz RR. Germ simulation: a novel approach for raising medical students awareness toward asepsis. Simul Healthc. 2011 Apr;6(2):65-70. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318206953a.
- Karahan Okuroglu G, Kaynar Simsek A, Pazar N, Ecevit Alpar S. The Effect of Video-Assisted Training and Visual Feedback With UV Germ Technology on Nursing Students' Hand Hygiene Beliefs, Practices, and Compliance: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Nurs Care Qual. 2023 Oct-Dec 01;38(4):335-340. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000710. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
- Kisacik OG, Cigerci Y, Gunes U. Impact of the fluorescent concretization intervention on effectiveness of hand hygiene in nursing students: A randomized controlled study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Feb;97:104719. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104719. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
- Gorucu S, Turk G, Karacam Z. The effect of simulation-based learning on nursing students' clinical decision-making skills: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Sep;140:106270. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106270. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
- Fernandes DR, Santos BND, Guimaraes CS, Ferreira EB, Margatho AS, Reis PEDD, Pittet D, Silveira RCCP. Educational technologies for teaching hand hygiene: Systematic review. PLoS One. 2024 Jan 16;19(1):e0294725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294725. eCollection 2024.
- Cole HS, Lippe MP, Guerra DS. The Pathway to Developing a Competency-based Tool for Entry-level Nursing Simulation: A Delphi Study. J Prof Nurs. 2024 Jul-Aug;53:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2024.04.004. Epub 2024 May 2.
- Chu Y, Yao Q, Tan F, Li Y, Pan X. Effectiveness of a Glo Germ-based assessment and educational intervention to improve hand hygiene compliance among hospital cleaning staff. Front Public Health. 2026 Jan 28;13:1694440. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1694440. eCollection 2025.
- Aouthmany S, Mehalik H, Bailey M, Pei M, Syed S, Brickman K, Morrison K, Khuder S. Use of ultraviolet light in graduate medical education to assess confidence among residents and fellows in handwashing instruction. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Apr 20;2(1):e65. doi: 10.1017/ash.2021.208. eCollection 2022.
- Alharbi A, Nurfianti A, Mullen RF, McClure JD, Miller WH. The effectiveness of simulation-based learning (SBL) on students' knowledge and skills in nursing programs: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 7;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06080-z.
- Walsh JA, Sethares KA. The Use of Guided Reflection in Simulation-Based Education With Prelicensure Nursing Students: An Integrative Review. J Nurs Educ. 2022 Feb;61(2):73-79. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20211213-01. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
- Vanyolos E, Lidak E, Boros M, Kosa K, Gomori G, Orosz N, Peto K, Nemeth N. Examining the impact of alerting visual stimuli on the effectiveness of practising surgical scrub technique in medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2025 Dec 27;26(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-08479-8.
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- GLOGERM SURGİCAL HAND WASHING
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Descrição do plano IPD
Individual participant data will not be made publicly available. The study data will be maintained confidentially and used in accordance with the approved research protocol, institutional policies, and applicable data protection regulations.
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .