Tobacco Dependence Treatment Education for Dental Students
12 апреля 2017 г. обновлено: Jacqueline A. Singleton, University of Louisville
Tobacco Dependence Treatment Education for Dental Students Using Standardized Patients
This study determines if there is a difference in dental students' attitudes, perceived barriers, subjective norms, perceived skills, self-efficacy, intentions to provide cessation treatment, and cessation knowledge in those students receiving a tobacco cessation lecture along with practice sessions using standardized patients and those students receiving only a tobacco cessation lecture.
The study determines if dental students' use of tobacco affects their intent to provide cessation treatment to patients, and if the time between receiving the lecture and participating in the practice sessions using standardized patients makes a difference in dental students' attitudes, perceived barriers, subjective norms.
perceived skills, self-efficacy, intentions to provide cessation treatment, and cessation knowledge.
Обзор исследования
Подробное описание
The experimental study has a pretest-posttest design.
It evaluates the changes to dental students' attitudes, perceived barriers, subjective norms, perceived skills, self-efficacy, intentions to provide cessation treatment, and tobacco cessation knowledge between those students receiving a lecture along with practice sessions using standardized patients and those students receiving only a lecture.
Dental students will be invited to complete two questionnaires.
The control group of dental students will complete the first questionnaire before the lecture and the second questionnaire after the lecture.
The experimental group of dental students will complete the first questionnaire before the lecture and the second questionnaire after the lecture and the practice and debriefing sessions.
Subjects will include 120 first year dental students in an introductory course to clinical dentistry.
The cessation training is a required activity in the course.
Students are divided into small groups according to their bench or lab numbers.
These numbers are assigned to the student based on the alphabetical order of their name.
The eligibility criteria is: 1) Must be a first year dental student in Introduction to Clinical Dentistry 1 at the University of Louisville, and 2) Must be willing to volunteer to complete pre- and post-questionnaires about the cessation treatment educational program.
The exclusion criteria is: Subject is not willing to give consent to complete the pre- and post- questionnaire.
Тип исследования
Интервенционный
Регистрация (Действительный)
94
Фаза
- Непригодный
Контакты и местонахождение
В этом разделе приведены контактные данные лиц, проводящих исследование, и информация о том, где проводится это исследование.
Места учебы
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, Соединенные Штаты, 40292
- University of Louisville School of Dentistry
-
-
Критерии участия
Исследователи ищут людей, которые соответствуют определенному описанию, называемому критериям приемлемости. Некоторыми примерами этих критериев являются общее состояние здоровья человека или предшествующее лечение.
Критерии приемлемости
Возраст, подходящий для обучения
От 18 лет до 65 лет (Взрослый, Пожилой взрослый)
Принимает здоровых добровольцев
Да
Полы, имеющие право на обучение
Все
Описание
Inclusion Criteria:
- must be a first year dental student in Introduction to Clinical Dentistry I at the study institution
- volunteer to complete pre- and post-questionnaires concerning tobacco cessation treatment educational training.
Exclusion Criteria:
- subject does not complete pre- and post- questionnaires.
Учебный план
В этом разделе представлена подробная информация о плане исследования, в том числе о том, как планируется исследование и что оно измеряет.
Как устроено исследование?
Детали дизайна
- Основная цель: Профилактика
- Распределение: Нерандомизированный
- Интервенционная модель: Параллельное назначение
- Маскировка: Нет (открытая этикетка)
Оружие и интервенции
Группа участников / Армия |
Вмешательство/лечение |
|---|---|
|
Экспериментальный: Counseling practice sessions
Dental students will be administered the first questionnaire before receiving a tobacco cessation lecture and the second questionnaire after the lecture, counseling practice sessions using standardized patients, and debriefing session.
|
Dental students will complete the first questionnaire before a tobacco cessation lecture and the second questionnaire after the lecture, counseling practice sessions using standardized patients and a debriefing session.
Другие имена:
|
|
Без вмешательства: Lecture only
Students will receive the first questionnaire before the lecture and the second questionnaire after the lecture
|
Что измеряет исследование?
Первичные показатели результатов
Мера результата |
Мера Описание |
Временное ограничение |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Attitude Score
Временное ограничение: Questionnaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
The attitude variable was computed by adding the values from two questionnaire items to assess the level agreement with statements: 1.) "It is important for members of the profession to discuss tobacco use with patients" and 2.) "A brief intervention (3 minutes) for tobacco cessation with my patients would be effective."
The rating scale was: 0 = strongly disagree, 1 = moderately disagree, 2 = somewhat disagree, 3 = neither disagree or agree, 4 = somewhat agree, 5 = moderately agree, and 6 = strongly agree.
A higher value represents participants' more positive attitude toward providing tobacco cessation treatment (Range:0-8).
The difference in the attitude from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total value of the variable at Questionnaire 1 from the total value at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Perceived Barriers Score
Временное ограничение: Questionnaire 1(baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2(post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling /debriefing sessions)
|
The perceived barriers variable was computed by adding the total number of barriers reported by participants.
Participants were asked to select all factors that may limit their ability to counsel tobacco users during every visit.
The rating scale for reporting barriers was: 0 = no and 1 = yes.
A higher value represents a higher number of barriers to providing tobacco cessation treatment reported by participants(Range: 0-11).
The difference in perceived barriers from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total number of perceived barriers at Questionnaire 1 from the total number of perceived barriers at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1(baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2(post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling /debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subjective Norms Score
Временное ограничение: Questionnaire 1 ( baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
Subjective norms are beliefs that people who influence your actions approve or disapprove of the behavior.
The subjective norms variable was computed by adding the values of six questions to assess the participants' level of perceived social pressures to counsel patients in quitting tobacco use.
Questions wer rated on a seven-point Likert scale; higher point values indicate a perceived social norm more supportive of counseling patients in quitting tobacco use(Range: 0-36).
The difference in the subjective norms score from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total number of participants' subjective norms at Questionnaire 1 from the total number of participants' subjective norms at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1 ( baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Perceived Skills Score
Временное ограничение: Questionnaire 1(baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
The perceived skills variable was computed by adding the values of seven questions that assessed the participants' perceived level of tobacco cessation treatment skills from poor to excellent.
The rating scale was: 0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = very good, and 4 = excellent.
A higher value represents a higher level of tobacco cessation treatment skills perceived by participants (Range: 0-28).
The difference in the participants' perceived skills from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total value of perceived skills at Questionnaire 1 from the total value of perceived skills at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1(baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Self-efficacy Score
Временное ограничение: Questionaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
Self-efficacy represents an individual's confidence in his/her ability to perform a behavior.
The self-efficacy variable was computed by adding the values of ten questions to assess the participants' self-efficacy to counsel patients to quit tobacco use.
The rating scale was: 0 = not at all confident, 1 = not very confident, 2 = moderately confident, 3 = very confident, and 4 = extremely confident.
A higher value represents participants' higher level of confidence in providing tobacco cessation treatment (Range: 0-40).
The difference in participants' self-efficacy from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total value of self-efficacy at Questionnaire 1 from the total value at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Intentions Score
Временное ограничение: Questionnaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
Participants' intentions to provide tobacco cessation treatment were computed by adding values from thirteen questions to assess dental students' intent to counsel patients to quit tobacco use.
The rating scale was: 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = almost always, 4 = always (every visit).
A higher value represents participants' stronger intentions to provide tobacco cessation treatment (Range: 0-52).
The difference in participants' intentions to provide tobacco cessation treatment from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total value of participants' intentions at Questionnaire 1 from the total value of participants' intentions at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tobacco Cessation Knowledge Score
Временное ограничение: Questionnaire 1 (pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
The tobacco cessation knowledge variable was computed by adding the participants' total number of correct answers of the ten knowledge questions.
The rating scale was: 0 = incorrect and 1 = correct.
A higher value represents participants' higher level of tobacco cessation treatment knowledge (Range: 0-10).
The difference in the tobacco cessation knowledge from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total number of participants' correct answers at Questionnaire 1 from the total number of participants' correct answers at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1 (pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
Соавторы и исследователи
Здесь вы найдете людей и организации, участвующие в этом исследовании.
Спонсор
Следователи
- Главный следователь: Jacqueline A Singleton, MEd, University of Louisville
Публикации и полезные ссылки
Лицо, ответственное за внесение сведений об исследовании, добровольно предоставляет эти публикации. Это может быть что угодно, связанное с исследованием.
Даты записи исследования
Эти даты отслеживают ход отправки отчетов об исследованиях и сводных результатов на сайт ClinicalTrials.gov. Записи исследований и сообщаемые результаты проверяются Национальной медицинской библиотекой (NLM), чтобы убедиться, что они соответствуют определенным стандартам контроля качества, прежде чем публиковать их на общедоступном веб-сайте.
Изучение основных дат
Начало исследования
1 февраля 2012 г.
Первичное завершение (Действительный)
1 апреля 2012 г.
Завершение исследования (Действительный)
1 апреля 2012 г.
Даты регистрации исследования
Первый отправленный
24 января 2012 г.
Впервые представлено, что соответствует критериям контроля качества
27 января 2012 г.
Первый опубликованный (Оценивать)
1 февраля 2012 г.
Обновления учебных записей
Последнее опубликованное обновление (Действительный)
23 мая 2017 г.
Последнее отправленное обновление, отвечающее критериям контроля качества
12 апреля 2017 г.
Последняя проверка
1 апреля 2017 г.
Дополнительная информация
Термины, связанные с этим исследованием
Ключевые слова
Дополнительные соответствующие термины MeSH
Другие идентификационные номера исследования
- 12.0026
Планирование данных отдельных участников (IPD)
Планируете делиться данными об отдельных участниках (IPD)?
НЕТ
Эта информация была получена непосредственно с веб-сайта clinicaltrials.gov без каких-либо изменений. Если у вас есть запросы на изменение, удаление или обновление сведений об исследовании, обращайтесь по адресу register@clinicaltrials.gov. Как только изменение будет реализовано на clinicaltrials.gov, оно будет автоматически обновлено и на нашем веб-сайте. .