Tobacco Dependence Treatment Education for Dental Students
12 de abril de 2017 atualizado por: Jacqueline A. Singleton, University of Louisville
Tobacco Dependence Treatment Education for Dental Students Using Standardized Patients
This study determines if there is a difference in dental students' attitudes, perceived barriers, subjective norms, perceived skills, self-efficacy, intentions to provide cessation treatment, and cessation knowledge in those students receiving a tobacco cessation lecture along with practice sessions using standardized patients and those students receiving only a tobacco cessation lecture.
The study determines if dental students' use of tobacco affects their intent to provide cessation treatment to patients, and if the time between receiving the lecture and participating in the practice sessions using standardized patients makes a difference in dental students' attitudes, perceived barriers, subjective norms.
perceived skills, self-efficacy, intentions to provide cessation treatment, and cessation knowledge.
Visão geral do estudo
Descrição detalhada
The experimental study has a pretest-posttest design.
It evaluates the changes to dental students' attitudes, perceived barriers, subjective norms, perceived skills, self-efficacy, intentions to provide cessation treatment, and tobacco cessation knowledge between those students receiving a lecture along with practice sessions using standardized patients and those students receiving only a lecture.
Dental students will be invited to complete two questionnaires.
The control group of dental students will complete the first questionnaire before the lecture and the second questionnaire after the lecture.
The experimental group of dental students will complete the first questionnaire before the lecture and the second questionnaire after the lecture and the practice and debriefing sessions.
Subjects will include 120 first year dental students in an introductory course to clinical dentistry.
The cessation training is a required activity in the course.
Students are divided into small groups according to their bench or lab numbers.
These numbers are assigned to the student based on the alphabetical order of their name.
The eligibility criteria is: 1) Must be a first year dental student in Introduction to Clinical Dentistry 1 at the University of Louisville, and 2) Must be willing to volunteer to complete pre- and post-questionnaires about the cessation treatment educational program.
The exclusion criteria is: Subject is not willing to give consent to complete the pre- and post- questionnaire.
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
94
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, Estados Unidos, 40292
- University of Louisville School of Dentistry
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos a 65 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Sim
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- must be a first year dental student in Introduction to Clinical Dentistry I at the study institution
- volunteer to complete pre- and post-questionnaires concerning tobacco cessation treatment educational training.
Exclusion Criteria:
- subject does not complete pre- and post- questionnaires.
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
- Alocação: Não randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Counseling practice sessions
Dental students will be administered the first questionnaire before receiving a tobacco cessation lecture and the second questionnaire after the lecture, counseling practice sessions using standardized patients, and debriefing session.
|
Dental students will complete the first questionnaire before a tobacco cessation lecture and the second questionnaire after the lecture, counseling practice sessions using standardized patients and a debriefing session.
Outros nomes:
|
|
Sem intervenção: Lecture only
Students will receive the first questionnaire before the lecture and the second questionnaire after the lecture
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Attitude Score
Prazo: Questionnaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
The attitude variable was computed by adding the values from two questionnaire items to assess the level agreement with statements: 1.) "It is important for members of the profession to discuss tobacco use with patients" and 2.) "A brief intervention (3 minutes) for tobacco cessation with my patients would be effective."
The rating scale was: 0 = strongly disagree, 1 = moderately disagree, 2 = somewhat disagree, 3 = neither disagree or agree, 4 = somewhat agree, 5 = moderately agree, and 6 = strongly agree.
A higher value represents participants' more positive attitude toward providing tobacco cessation treatment (Range:0-8).
The difference in the attitude from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total value of the variable at Questionnaire 1 from the total value at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Perceived Barriers Score
Prazo: Questionnaire 1(baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2(post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling /debriefing sessions)
|
The perceived barriers variable was computed by adding the total number of barriers reported by participants.
Participants were asked to select all factors that may limit their ability to counsel tobacco users during every visit.
The rating scale for reporting barriers was: 0 = no and 1 = yes.
A higher value represents a higher number of barriers to providing tobacco cessation treatment reported by participants(Range: 0-11).
The difference in perceived barriers from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total number of perceived barriers at Questionnaire 1 from the total number of perceived barriers at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1(baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2(post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling /debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Subjective Norms Score
Prazo: Questionnaire 1 ( baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
Subjective norms are beliefs that people who influence your actions approve or disapprove of the behavior.
The subjective norms variable was computed by adding the values of six questions to assess the participants' level of perceived social pressures to counsel patients in quitting tobacco use.
Questions wer rated on a seven-point Likert scale; higher point values indicate a perceived social norm more supportive of counseling patients in quitting tobacco use(Range: 0-36).
The difference in the subjective norms score from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total number of participants' subjective norms at Questionnaire 1 from the total number of participants' subjective norms at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1 ( baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Perceived Skills Score
Prazo: Questionnaire 1(baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
The perceived skills variable was computed by adding the values of seven questions that assessed the participants' perceived level of tobacco cessation treatment skills from poor to excellent.
The rating scale was: 0 = poor, 1 = fair, 2 = good, 3 = very good, and 4 = excellent.
A higher value represents a higher level of tobacco cessation treatment skills perceived by participants (Range: 0-28).
The difference in the participants' perceived skills from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total value of perceived skills at Questionnaire 1 from the total value of perceived skills at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1(baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Self-efficacy Score
Prazo: Questionaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
Self-efficacy represents an individual's confidence in his/her ability to perform a behavior.
The self-efficacy variable was computed by adding the values of ten questions to assess the participants' self-efficacy to counsel patients to quit tobacco use.
The rating scale was: 0 = not at all confident, 1 = not very confident, 2 = moderately confident, 3 = very confident, and 4 = extremely confident.
A higher value represents participants' higher level of confidence in providing tobacco cessation treatment (Range: 0-40).
The difference in participants' self-efficacy from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total value of self-efficacy at Questionnaire 1 from the total value at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Intentions Score
Prazo: Questionnaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
Participants' intentions to provide tobacco cessation treatment were computed by adding values from thirteen questions to assess dental students' intent to counsel patients to quit tobacco use.
The rating scale was: 0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = sometimes, 3 = almost always, 4 = always (every visit).
A higher value represents participants' stronger intentions to provide tobacco cessation treatment (Range: 0-52).
The difference in participants' intentions to provide tobacco cessation treatment from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total value of participants' intentions at Questionnaire 1 from the total value of participants' intentions at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1 (baseline/pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tobacco Cessation Knowledge Score
Prazo: Questionnaire 1 (pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
The tobacco cessation knowledge variable was computed by adding the participants' total number of correct answers of the ten knowledge questions.
The rating scale was: 0 = incorrect and 1 = correct.
A higher value represents participants' higher level of tobacco cessation treatment knowledge (Range: 0-10).
The difference in the tobacco cessation knowledge from Questionnaire 1 to Questionnaire 2 was computed by subtracting the total number of participants' correct answers at Questionnaire 1 from the total number of participants' correct answers at Questionnaire 2.
|
Questionnaire 1 (pre-lecture) to Questionnaire 2 (post-lecture or post-lecture and counseling/debriefing sessions)
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Jacqueline A Singleton, MEd, University of Louisville
Publicações e links úteis
A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo
1 de fevereiro de 2012
Conclusão Primária (Real)
1 de abril de 2012
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
1 de abril de 2012
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
24 de janeiro de 2012
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
27 de janeiro de 2012
Primeira postagem (Estimativa)
1 de fevereiro de 2012
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
23 de maio de 2017
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
12 de abril de 2017
Última verificação
1 de abril de 2017
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- 12.0026
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
NÃO
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .
Ensaios clínicos em Counseling practice sessions
-
The University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleColorado State UniversityAtivo, não recrutandoTranstorno por Uso de Cannabis, Leve | Transtorno por Uso de Cannabis, Moderado | Transtorno do Uso de Cannabis, GraveEstados Unidos