Denna sida har översatts automatiskt och översättningens korrekthet kan inte garanteras. Vänligen se engelsk version för en källtext.

DECISION+, a Training Program to Improve Optimal Drug Prescription (Decision+)

30 januari 2013 uppdaterad av: France Legare, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

DECISION+: Une Formation Pour Les médecins de Famille Sur la Prise de décision partagée Afin d'Optimiser Les décisions Cliniques Concernant l'Utilisation d'Antibiotiques Pour Les Infections aiguës Des Voies Respiratoires (IAVR)

Decisions about the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections are the most frequently reported reason for consulting a family physician. Although it varies according to the specific type of acute respiratory infections, the use of antibiotics is estimated to be 63% to 67%, well above the expected prevalence of bacterial infections thus suggesting overuse of antibiotics. Consequently, there is an urgent need for helping family physicians and their patients to improve the clinical decision making process regarding the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections. We will evaluate the impact of DECISION +, a multifaceted intervention program that includes training in shared decision making, reminders and feedback targeting physicians, and decision support tools targeting patients on the decision to use antibiotics for acute respiratory infections. Results from this study will lay the ground for a national strategy targeting the improvement of the clinical decision making process regarding antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in primary care. In turn, this will increase quality of care and patient safety.

Studieöversikt

Studietyp

Interventionell

Inskrivning (Faktisk)

712

Fas

  • Fas 1

Kontakter och platser

Det här avsnittet innehåller kontaktuppgifter för dem som genomför studien och information om var denna studie genomförs.

Studieorter

      • Quebec, Kanada
        • Centre Hospitalier Université Laval - Hôpital St-François d'Assise

Deltagandekriterier

Forskare letar efter personer som passar en viss beskrivning, så kallade behörighetskriterier. Några exempel på dessa kriterier är en persons allmänna hälsotillstånd eller tidigare behandlingar.

Urvalskriterier

Åldrar som är berättigade till studier

  • Barn
  • Vuxen
  • Äldre vuxen

Tar emot friska volontärer

Nej

Kön som är behöriga för studier

Allt

Beskrivning

FAMILY PHYSICIANS:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All FP (teachers and residents) providing care in the walk-in clinic in each Family Practice Teaching Unit (FPTU) will be eligible to participate in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • he/she was involved or participated in the DECISION + pilot RCT
  • he/she is not expected to be practicing at the FPTU for the whole duration of the study (e.g. residents ending their residency program or doing rotations outside of the FPTU, planned pregnancy/delivery, planned retirement).

PATIENTS:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • if 17 years old and under, must be accompanied by a parents or a guardians)
  • they are consulting a participating physician for an ARI, for which treatment with an antibiotic is considered
  • they are able (patients or the accompanying parent or guardians) to read, understand and write French (expected level: 8th grade)
  • they give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a condition requiring emergency care will be excluded.

Studieplan

Det här avsnittet ger detaljer om studieplanen, inklusive hur studien är utformad och vad studien mäter.

Hur är studien utformad?

Designdetaljer

  • Primärt syfte: Hälsovårdsforskning
  • Tilldelning: Randomiserad
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallellt uppdrag
  • Maskning: Ingen (Open Label)

Vapen och interventioner

Deltagargrupp / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Inget ingripande: Kontrollera
Vanlig vård
Experimentell: DECISION+ Program
Exposure to the Decision+ Program
DECISION+ is a multifaceted intervention program that includes: On site course and Internet-based courses (2x120 min), reminders of expected behaviours and feedback.

Vad mäter studien?

Primära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Tidsram
Proportion of patients reporting a decision for "immediate antibiotics."
Tidsram: After index consultation
After index consultation

Sekundära resultatmått

Resultatmått
Åtgärdsbeskrivning
Tidsram
Decision to use antibiotics
Tidsram: After index consultation

After an index consultation, we will ask patients: "Was a prescription for an antibiotic or a sample of antibiotic provided to treat an ARI (acute otitis media, acute bronchitis, acute pharyngitis, or acute rhinosinusitis)?" Possible answers will be:

  • Yes,(Immediate antibiotics);
  • Yes,(Delayed antibiotics);
  • No (no antibiotics).
After index consultation
Decisional conflict
Tidsram: After index consultation
Will be assessed with the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) after the index consultation. This questionnaire is similar for physicians and patients and includes 19 items, on a five-point Likert scale, divided into five subscales that are i)uncertainty and its modifiable deficits: ii) knowledge, iii) values clarification, iv) support and v) perception of an effective choice. Both the physician and patient versions of the DCS have adequate psychometric properties and have the same meaning for both physicians and patients.
After index consultation
Adherence to the decision that was made
Tidsram: 2 weeks after the index consultation
2 weeks after the index consultation, patients will be asked via a telephone interview: "What was the decision made with the FP about antibiotic use for ARI two weeks ago?" and "Have you complied with this decision?" (yes or no). If patients answer "no", research assistants, using an open-ended question, will inquire about the reasons and the options that were adhered to. Interviewers will be unaware of the study group and will be instructed not to ask questions that could reveal the study group.
2 weeks after the index consultation
Decisional regret
Tidsram: 2 weeks after the index consultation
2 weeks after the index consultation, decisional regret will be assessed in patients using the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) via a telephone interview. The DRS is a 5-item scale with adequate psychometric properties that correlates strongly with decision satisfaction and overall QOL.
2 weeks after the index consultation
Quality of life (QOL)
Tidsram: Baseline and 2 weeks after the index consultation
For patients only, before and two weeks after the index consultation (via a telephone interview), QOL will be assessed using the Short Form-12 (SF-12V2 Health survey). This questionnaire measures general health status from the patient's point of view and includes eight concepts commonly represented in health status: physical functioning, role functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional and mental health.
Baseline and 2 weeks after the index consultation
Intention to engage in SDM in future consultations dealing with antibiotic use for ARI
Tidsram: Baseline and 2 weeks after the index consultation
In FP and their patients, this intention will be assessed based on the Theory of planned behavior (TPB). The questionnaire includes 15 items, on a 7-point Likert scale, that cover the constructs of the TPB, namely attitudes, social norm, perceived behavioral control and intention. Patients will complete this questionnaire before and 2 weeks after the index consultation; physicians will complete it once during the baseline data collection period and after the last encounter of the post-intervention data collection period.
Baseline and 2 weeks after the index consultation

Samarbetspartners och utredare

Det är här du hittar personer och organisationer som är involverade i denna studie.

Publikationer och användbara länkar

Den som ansvarar för att lägga in information om studien tillhandahåller frivilligt dessa publikationer. Dessa kan handla om allt som har med studien att göra.

Användbara länkar

Studieavstämningsdatum

Dessa datum spårar framstegen för inlämningar av studieposter och sammanfattande resultat till ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieposter och rapporterade resultat granskas av National Library of Medicine (NLM) för att säkerställa att de uppfyller specifika kvalitetskontrollstandarder innan de publiceras på den offentliga webbplatsen.

Studera stora datum

Studiestart

1 maj 2010

Primärt slutförande (Faktisk)

1 april 2011

Avslutad studie (Faktisk)

1 april 2011

Studieregistreringsdatum

Först inskickad

3 maj 2010

Först inskickad som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

3 maj 2010

Första postat (Uppskatta)

4 maj 2010

Uppdateringar av studier

Senaste uppdatering publicerad (Uppskatta)

1 februari 2013

Senaste inskickade uppdateringen som uppfyllde QC-kriterierna

30 januari 2013

Senast verifierad

1 januari 2013

Mer information

Termer relaterade till denna studie

Ytterligare relevanta MeSH-villkor

Andra studie-ID-nummer

  • FRSQ20131
  • 35247 (Annan identifierare: CHUQ)

Denna information hämtades direkt från webbplatsen clinicaltrials.gov utan några ändringar. Om du har några önskemål om att ändra, ta bort eller uppdatera dina studieuppgifter, vänligen kontakta register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ändring har implementerats på clinicaltrials.gov, kommer denna att uppdateras automatiskt även på vår webbplats .

Prenumerera