Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

DECISION+, a Training Program to Improve Optimal Drug Prescription (Decision+)

30. januar 2013 opdateret af: France Legare, CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

DECISION+: Une Formation Pour Les médecins de Famille Sur la Prise de décision partagée Afin d'Optimiser Les décisions Cliniques Concernant l'Utilisation d'Antibiotiques Pour Les Infections aiguës Des Voies Respiratoires (IAVR)

Decisions about the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections are the most frequently reported reason for consulting a family physician. Although it varies according to the specific type of acute respiratory infections, the use of antibiotics is estimated to be 63% to 67%, well above the expected prevalence of bacterial infections thus suggesting overuse of antibiotics. Consequently, there is an urgent need for helping family physicians and their patients to improve the clinical decision making process regarding the use of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections. We will evaluate the impact of DECISION +, a multifaceted intervention program that includes training in shared decision making, reminders and feedback targeting physicians, and decision support tools targeting patients on the decision to use antibiotics for acute respiratory infections. Results from this study will lay the ground for a national strategy targeting the improvement of the clinical decision making process regarding antibiotic use for acute respiratory infections in primary care. In turn, this will increase quality of care and patient safety.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Intervention / Behandling

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

712

Fase

  • Fase 1

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

  • Canada
      • Quebec, Canada
        • Centre Hospitalier Université Laval - Hôpital St-François d'Assise

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

FAMILY PHYSICIANS:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All FP (teachers and residents) providing care in the walk-in clinic in each Family Practice Teaching Unit (FPTU) will be eligible to participate in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • he/she was involved or participated in the DECISION + pilot RCT
  • he/she is not expected to be practicing at the FPTU for the whole duration of the study (e.g. residents ending their residency program or doing rotations outside of the FPTU, planned pregnancy/delivery, planned retirement).

PATIENTS:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • if 17 years old and under, must be accompanied by a parents or a guardians)
  • they are consulting a participating physician for an ARI, for which treatment with an antibiotic is considered
  • they are able (patients or the accompanying parent or guardians) to read, understand and write French (expected level: 8th grade)
  • they give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a condition requiring emergency care will be excluded.

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Ingen indgriben: Styring
Sædvanlig pleje
Eksperimentel: DECISION+ Program
Exposure to the Decision+ Program
Adfærdsmæssigt: Decision+ program (to improve optimal drug prescription for ARI)
DECISION+ is a multifaceted intervention program that includes: On site course and Internet-based courses (2x120 min), reminders of expected behaviours and feedback.

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Tidsramme
Proportion of patients reporting a decision for "immediate antibiotics."
Tidsramme: After index consultation
After index consultation

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Decision to use antibiotics
Tidsramme: After index consultation

After an index consultation, we will ask patients: "Was a prescription for an antibiotic or a sample of antibiotic provided to treat an ARI (acute otitis media, acute bronchitis, acute pharyngitis, or acute rhinosinusitis)?" Possible answers will be:

  • Yes,(Immediate antibiotics);
  • Yes,(Delayed antibiotics);
  • No (no antibiotics).
After index consultation
Decisional conflict
Tidsramme: After index consultation
Will be assessed with the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) after the index consultation. This questionnaire is similar for physicians and patients and includes 19 items, on a five-point Likert scale, divided into five subscales that are i)uncertainty and its modifiable deficits: ii) knowledge, iii) values clarification, iv) support and v) perception of an effective choice. Both the physician and patient versions of the DCS have adequate psychometric properties and have the same meaning for both physicians and patients.
After index consultation
Adherence to the decision that was made
Tidsramme: 2 weeks after the index consultation
2 weeks after the index consultation, patients will be asked via a telephone interview: "What was the decision made with the FP about antibiotic use for ARI two weeks ago?" and "Have you complied with this decision?" (yes or no). If patients answer "no", research assistants, using an open-ended question, will inquire about the reasons and the options that were adhered to. Interviewers will be unaware of the study group and will be instructed not to ask questions that could reveal the study group.
2 weeks after the index consultation
Decisional regret
Tidsramme: 2 weeks after the index consultation
2 weeks after the index consultation, decisional regret will be assessed in patients using the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS) via a telephone interview. The DRS is a 5-item scale with adequate psychometric properties that correlates strongly with decision satisfaction and overall QOL.
2 weeks after the index consultation
Quality of life (QOL)
Tidsramme: Baseline and 2 weeks after the index consultation
For patients only, before and two weeks after the index consultation (via a telephone interview), QOL will be assessed using the Short Form-12 (SF-12V2 Health survey). This questionnaire measures general health status from the patient's point of view and includes eight concepts commonly represented in health status: physical functioning, role functioning, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, and emotional and mental health.
Baseline and 2 weeks after the index consultation
Intention to engage in SDM in future consultations dealing with antibiotic use for ARI
Tidsramme: Baseline and 2 weeks after the index consultation
In FP and their patients, this intention will be assessed based on the Theory of planned behavior (TPB). The questionnaire includes 15 items, on a 7-point Likert scale, that cover the constructs of the TPB, namely attitudes, social norm, perceived behavioral control and intention. Patients will complete this questionnaire before and 2 weeks after the index consultation; physicians will complete it once during the baseline data collection period and after the last encounter of the post-intervention data collection period.
Baseline and 2 weeks after the index consultation

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Sponsor

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Hjælpsomme links

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. maj 2010

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. april 2011

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. april 2011

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

3. maj 2010

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

3. maj 2010

Først opslået (Skøn)

4. maj 2010

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)

1. februar 2013

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

30. januar 2013

Sidst verificeret

1. januar 2013

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • FRSQ20131
  • 35247 (Anden identifikator: CHUQ)

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Akutte luftvejsinfektioner

Søg i lignende forsøg

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

CROs by country

CROs in Mauritius

Betingelser

Sjældne sygdomme

Narkotikainterventioner

Kosttilskud

Sponsor / samarbejdspartnere

Placeringer

Abonner